Loading…
Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability
This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. T...
Saved in:
Published in: | Learning and motivation 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43 |
container_end_page | 92 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 79 |
container_title | Learning and motivation |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Maes, J.H.R. van der Goot, M. |
description | This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17487742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ729907</ericid><els_id>S0023969005000391</els_id><sourcerecordid>1006307761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVJoZNpX6B0YbLIzu7RzbYgmxDSJiWlm3YtZPmoaLCliWQH8vaVmdBFFlkddP6LpI-QzxQaCrT9emimOS4NA5AN8AaAvyM7CkrWijJ2RnYAjNeqVfCBnOd8AKBU9mpHft6tswlVPGIyYakmNCn48Ldaw4ipsjHYNSUsSkIfXEwW5-0UXVnkYwwZqyeTvBn85Jfnj-S9M1PGTy9zT_58u_19c1c__Pp-f3P9UFvB-FJzKkCC4VwIPvZD27WjEg560yrb9tI52UlHqXEt9gMOTpSP2J7igJSJcRR8Ty5PvccUH1fMi559tjhNJmBcs6ad6Luu3LUnF6-Mh7imUN6mGZWisJFbGzuZbIo5J3T6mPxs0rOmoDe8-qA3vHrDq4HrgreEvpxCmLz9H7j90TGloCvy1YtcMDx5TDpbj8Hi6BPaRY_Rv9X-D4VyjVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215412254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNMVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognition & reasoning ; College students ; Humans ; Learning ; Operant Conditioning ; Operant learning ; Positive Reinforcement ; Response selection ; Response variability ; Responses ; Students</subject><ispartof>Learning and motivation, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ729907$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><title>Learning and motivation</title><description>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition & reasoning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Operant Conditioning</subject><subject>Operant learning</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Response selection</subject><subject>Response variability</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0023-9690</issn><issn>1095-9122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVJoZNpX6B0YbLIzu7RzbYgmxDSJiWlm3YtZPmoaLCliWQH8vaVmdBFFlkddP6LpI-QzxQaCrT9emimOS4NA5AN8AaAvyM7CkrWijJ2RnYAjNeqVfCBnOd8AKBU9mpHft6tswlVPGIyYakmNCn48Ldaw4ipsjHYNSUsSkIfXEwW5-0UXVnkYwwZqyeTvBn85Jfnj-S9M1PGTy9zT_58u_19c1c__Pp-f3P9UFvB-FJzKkCC4VwIPvZD27WjEg560yrb9tI52UlHqXEt9gMOTpSP2J7igJSJcRR8Ty5PvccUH1fMi559tjhNJmBcs6ad6Luu3LUnF6-Mh7imUN6mGZWisJFbGzuZbIo5J3T6mPxs0rOmoDe8-qA3vHrDq4HrgreEvpxCmLz9H7j90TGloCvy1YtcMDx5TDpbj8Hi6BPaRY_Rv9X-D4VyjVE</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Maes, J.H.R.</creator><creator>van der Goot, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><author>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition & reasoning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Operant Conditioning</topic><topic>Operant learning</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Response selection</topic><topic>Response variability</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maes, J.H.R.</au><au>van der Goot, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ729907</ericid><atitle>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</atitle><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>79-92</pages><issn>0023-9690</issn><eissn>1095-9122</eissn><coden>LNMVAV</coden><abstract>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0023-9690 |
ispartof | Learning and motivation, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92 |
issn | 0023-9690 1095-9122 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17487742 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC |
subjects | Behavior Cognition & reasoning College students Humans Learning Operant Conditioning Operant learning Positive Reinforcement Response selection Response variability Responses Students |
title | Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20operant%20learning%20under%20concurrent%20reinforcement%20of%20response%20variability&rft.jtitle=Learning%20and%20motivation&rft.au=Maes,%20J.H.R.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=79-92&rft.issn=0023-9690&rft.eissn=1095-9122&rft.coden=LNMVAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1006307761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215412254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ729907&rfr_iscdi=true |