Loading…

Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability

This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Learning and motivation 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92
Main Authors: Maes, J.H.R., van der Goot, M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43
container_end_page 92
container_issue 1
container_start_page 79
container_title Learning and motivation
container_volume 37
creator Maes, J.H.R.
van der Goot, M.
description This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17487742</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ericid>EJ729907</ericid><els_id>S0023969005000391</els_id><sourcerecordid>1006307761</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVJoZNpX6B0YbLIzu7RzbYgmxDSJiWlm3YtZPmoaLCliWQH8vaVmdBFFlkddP6LpI-QzxQaCrT9emimOS4NA5AN8AaAvyM7CkrWijJ2RnYAjNeqVfCBnOd8AKBU9mpHft6tswlVPGIyYakmNCn48Ldaw4ipsjHYNSUsSkIfXEwW5-0UXVnkYwwZqyeTvBn85Jfnj-S9M1PGTy9zT_58u_19c1c__Pp-f3P9UFvB-FJzKkCC4VwIPvZD27WjEg560yrb9tI52UlHqXEt9gMOTpSP2J7igJSJcRR8Ty5PvccUH1fMi559tjhNJmBcs6ad6Luu3LUnF6-Mh7imUN6mGZWisJFbGzuZbIo5J3T6mPxs0rOmoDe8-qA3vHrDq4HrgreEvpxCmLz9H7j90TGloCvy1YtcMDx5TDpbj8Hi6BPaRY_Rv9X-D4VyjVE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>215412254</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><source>ERIC</source><creator>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><description>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0023-9690</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-9122</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: LNMVAV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Behavior ; Cognition &amp; reasoning ; College students ; Humans ; Learning ; Operant Conditioning ; Operant learning ; Positive Reinforcement ; Response selection ; Response variability ; Responses ; Students</subject><ispartof>Learning and motivation, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92</ispartof><rights>2005 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Feb 2006</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ729907$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><title>Learning and motivation</title><description>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</description><subject>Behavior</subject><subject>Cognition &amp; reasoning</subject><subject>College students</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Learning</subject><subject>Operant Conditioning</subject><subject>Operant learning</subject><subject>Positive Reinforcement</subject><subject>Response selection</subject><subject>Response variability</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Students</subject><issn>0023-9690</issn><issn>1095-9122</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kMtq3DAUhkVJoZNpX6B0YbLIzu7RzbYgmxDSJiWlm3YtZPmoaLCliWQH8vaVmdBFFlkddP6LpI-QzxQaCrT9emimOS4NA5AN8AaAvyM7CkrWijJ2RnYAjNeqVfCBnOd8AKBU9mpHft6tswlVPGIyYakmNCn48Ldaw4ipsjHYNSUsSkIfXEwW5-0UXVnkYwwZqyeTvBn85Jfnj-S9M1PGTy9zT_58u_19c1c__Pp-f3P9UFvB-FJzKkCC4VwIPvZD27WjEg560yrb9tI52UlHqXEt9gMOTpSP2J7igJSJcRR8Ty5PvccUH1fMi559tjhNJmBcs6ad6Luu3LUnF6-Mh7imUN6mGZWisJFbGzuZbIo5J3T6mPxs0rOmoDe8-qA3vHrDq4HrgreEvpxCmLz9H7j90TGloCvy1YtcMDx5TDpbj8Hi6BPaRY_Rv9X-D4VyjVE</recordid><startdate>20060201</startdate><enddate>20060201</enddate><creator>Maes, J.H.R.</creator><creator>van der Goot, M.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QR</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060201</creationdate><title>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</title><author>Maes, J.H.R. ; van der Goot, M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Behavior</topic><topic>Cognition &amp; reasoning</topic><topic>College students</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Learning</topic><topic>Operant Conditioning</topic><topic>Operant learning</topic><topic>Positive Reinforcement</topic><topic>Response selection</topic><topic>Response variability</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Students</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maes, J.H.R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Goot, M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Chemoreception Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maes, J.H.R.</au><au>van der Goot, M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ729907</ericid><atitle>Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability</atitle><jtitle>Learning and motivation</jtitle><date>2006-02-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>79</spage><epage>92</epage><pages>79-92</pages><issn>0023-9690</issn><eissn>1095-9122</eissn><coden>LNMVAV</coden><abstract>This study asked whether the concurrent reinforcement of behavioral variability facilitates learning to emit a difficult target response. Sixty students repeatedly pressed sequences of keys, with an originally infrequently occurring target sequence consistently being followed by positive feedback. Three conditions differed in the feedback given to non-target sequences: concurrent positive feedback presented contingent on response variability, positive feedback presented non-contingently, or no reinforcement for any non-target responses (control condition). Contrary to the result of analogous rat studies, if anything, the participants in the control condition more readily learned to emit the target sequence than did the subjects in each of the other two conditions. It is argued that these contradictory findings are primarily caused by procedural differences, such as differences in the density of the reinforcement schedule applied to non-target behavior, rather than reflecting a true species difference.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0023-9690
ispartof Learning and motivation, 2006-02, Vol.37 (1), p.79-92
issn 0023-9690
1095-9122
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17487742
source ScienceDirect Journals; ERIC
subjects Behavior
Cognition & reasoning
College students
Humans
Learning
Operant Conditioning
Operant learning
Positive Reinforcement
Response selection
Response variability
Responses
Students
title Human operant learning under concurrent reinforcement of response variability
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T22%3A52%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Human%20operant%20learning%20under%20concurrent%20reinforcement%20of%20response%20variability&rft.jtitle=Learning%20and%20motivation&rft.au=Maes,%20J.H.R.&rft.date=2006-02-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=79&rft.epage=92&rft.pages=79-92&rft.issn=0023-9690&rft.eissn=1095-9122&rft.coden=LNMVAV&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.lmot.2005.03.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1006307761%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c423t-314050a33443d8b676d94f08a69c685ff575f11af6e8bebf4095c81ebe124dd43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=215412254&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ericid=EJ729907&rfr_iscdi=true