Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis

The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft was compared to the cuffed catheter in end-stage renal disease patients. All consented patients were evaluated for HeRO graft placement. Eligible patients that did not receive a graft were enrolled in the control group. Participants who had not exhauste...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Nephrology news & issues 2015-11, Vol.29 (12), p.30-37
Main Authors: Provenzano, Robert, LaFleur, Paula, McFadden, Lori, LaFleur, Matthew, Lorelli, David
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical
Catheters, Indwelling
Female
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Renal Dialysis - methods
Vascular Access Devices
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 37
container_issue 12
container_start_page 30
container_title Nephrology news & issues
container_volume 29
creator Provenzano, Robert
LaFleur, Paula
McFadden, Lori
LaFleur, Matthew
Lorelli, David
description The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft was compared to the cuffed catheter in end-stage renal disease patients. All consented patients were evaluated for HeRO graft placement. Eligible patients that did not receive a graft were enrolled in the control group. Participants who had not exhausted peripheral venous access sites suitable for fistulas and grafts were excluded. Differences in quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death were evaluated over one year. In thirty-three patients included in the analysis--16 HeRO, 17 control--significantly fewer bacteremia events (93.8% vs. 64.7%) and a significantly increased number of vascular interventions (64.7% vs. 25%) were reported for the HeRO versus Control group. The increased interventions in the HeRO group may be due to the two-step placement process.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pubme</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750432340</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1750432340</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-f348038897991d8d9975700bc3aebc5d187dc98379111f476cc8cea2d95a84a53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkEFLwzAYhnNQ3Jz-BclxHipJkzTJUYY6YTAZu5evyRdXSdfatJMd_O8KTvH08sDDc3jPyJQZW2Q8L8SEXKb0xpiUjNsLMsmLQmtl1ZR8vvRt6tAN9QEp7CEeU51oG-gSm9bXJ95grKGKSNfjEGL7QedL3Kxv6QGSGyP0FJzDlOhrD2Ggh3RH3RgCeupg2OGAf0K9p7t_4StyHiAmvD7tjGwfH7aLZbZaPz0v7ldZpwqVBSENE8ZYbS33xlurlWascgKwcspzo72zRmjLOQ9SF84Zh5B7q8BIUGJG5j_Zrm_fR0xD2dTJYYywx3ZMJdeKSZELyb7Vm5M6Vg36suvrBvpj-fuY-AJzt2ey</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750432340</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis</title><source>Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）</source><creator>Provenzano, Robert ; LaFleur, Paula ; McFadden, Lori ; LaFleur, Matthew ; Lorelli, David</creator><creatorcontrib>Provenzano, Robert ; LaFleur, Paula ; McFadden, Lori ; LaFleur, Matthew ; Lorelli, David</creatorcontrib><description>The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft was compared to the cuffed catheter in end-stage renal disease patients. All consented patients were evaluated for HeRO graft placement. Eligible patients that did not receive a graft were enrolled in the control group. Participants who had not exhausted peripheral venous access sites suitable for fistulas and grafts were excluded. Differences in quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death were evaluated over one year. In thirty-three patients included in the analysis--16 HeRO, 17 control--significantly fewer bacteremia events (93.8% vs. 64.7%) and a significantly increased number of vascular interventions (64.7% vs. 25%) were reported for the HeRO versus Control group. The increased interventions in the HeRO group may be due to the two-step placement process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0896-1263</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26677595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical ; Catheters, Indwelling ; Female ; Humans ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Nursing ; Prospective Studies ; Quality of Life ; Renal Dialysis - methods ; Vascular Access Devices</subject><ispartof>Nephrology news &amp; issues, 2015-11, Vol.29 (12), p.30-37</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26677595$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Provenzano, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFleur, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFleur, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorelli, David</creatorcontrib><title>Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis</title><title>Nephrology news &amp; issues</title><addtitle>Nephrol News Issues</addtitle><description>The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft was compared to the cuffed catheter in end-stage renal disease patients. All consented patients were evaluated for HeRO graft placement. Eligible patients that did not receive a graft were enrolled in the control group. Participants who had not exhausted peripheral venous access sites suitable for fistulas and grafts were excluded. Differences in quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death were evaluated over one year. In thirty-three patients included in the analysis--16 HeRO, 17 control--significantly fewer bacteremia events (93.8% vs. 64.7%) and a significantly increased number of vascular interventions (64.7% vs. 25%) were reported for the HeRO versus Control group. The increased interventions in the HeRO group may be due to the two-step placement process.</description><subject>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical</subject><subject>Catheters, Indwelling</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Nursing</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Quality of Life</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis - methods</subject><subject>Vascular Access Devices</subject><issn>0896-1263</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkEFLwzAYhnNQ3Jz-BclxHipJkzTJUYY6YTAZu5evyRdXSdfatJMd_O8KTvH08sDDc3jPyJQZW2Q8L8SEXKb0xpiUjNsLMsmLQmtl1ZR8vvRt6tAN9QEp7CEeU51oG-gSm9bXJ95grKGKSNfjEGL7QedL3Kxv6QGSGyP0FJzDlOhrD2Ggh3RH3RgCeupg2OGAf0K9p7t_4StyHiAmvD7tjGwfH7aLZbZaPz0v7ldZpwqVBSENE8ZYbS33xlurlWascgKwcspzo72zRmjLOQ9SF84Zh5B7q8BIUGJG5j_Zrm_fR0xD2dTJYYywx3ZMJdeKSZELyb7Vm5M6Vg36suvrBvpj-fuY-AJzt2ey</recordid><startdate>201511</startdate><enddate>201511</enddate><creator>Provenzano, Robert</creator><creator>LaFleur, Paula</creator><creator>McFadden, Lori</creator><creator>LaFleur, Matthew</creator><creator>Lorelli, David</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201511</creationdate><title>Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis</title><author>Provenzano, Robert ; LaFleur, Paula ; McFadden, Lori ; LaFleur, Matthew ; Lorelli, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-f348038897991d8d9975700bc3aebc5d187dc98379111f476cc8cea2d95a84a53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical</topic><topic>Catheters, Indwelling</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Nursing</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Quality of Life</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis - methods</topic><topic>Vascular Access Devices</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Provenzano, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFleur, Paula</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McFadden, Lori</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>LaFleur, Matthew</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lorelli, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Nephrology news &amp; issues</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Provenzano, Robert</au><au>LaFleur, Paula</au><au>McFadden, Lori</au><au>LaFleur, Matthew</au><au>Lorelli, David</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis</atitle><jtitle>Nephrology news &amp; issues</jtitle><addtitle>Nephrol News Issues</addtitle><date>2015-11</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>30</spage><epage>37</epage><pages>30-37</pages><issn>0896-1263</issn><abstract>The Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) graft was compared to the cuffed catheter in end-stage renal disease patients. All consented patients were evaluated for HeRO graft placement. Eligible patients that did not receive a graft were enrolled in the control group. Participants who had not exhausted peripheral venous access sites suitable for fistulas and grafts were excluded. Differences in quality of life and incidence of bacteremia, vascular interventions, hospitalizations, and death were evaluated over one year. In thirty-three patients included in the analysis--16 HeRO, 17 control--significantly fewer bacteremia events (93.8% vs. 64.7%) and a significantly increased number of vascular interventions (64.7% vs. 25%) were reported for the HeRO versus Control group. The increased interventions in the HeRO group may be due to the two-step placement process.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26677595</pmid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0896-1263
ispartof Nephrology news & issues, 2015-11, Vol.29 (12), p.30-37
issn 0896-1263
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750432340
source Free E-Journal (出版社公開部分のみ）
subjects Arteriovenous Shunt, Surgical
Catheters, Indwelling
Female
Humans
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
Male
Middle Aged
Nursing
Prospective Studies
Quality of Life
Renal Dialysis - methods
Vascular Access Devices
title Prospective analysis of Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (HeRO) vascular access graft vs. cuffed catheter access in hemodialysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T09%3A03%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pubme&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prospective%20analysis%20of%20Hemodialysis%20Reliable%20Outflow%20(HeRO)%20vascular%20access%20graft%20vs.%20cuffed%20catheter%20access%20in%20hemodialysis&rft.jtitle=Nephrology%20news%20&%20issues&rft.au=Provenzano,%20Robert&rft.date=2015-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=30&rft.epage=37&rft.pages=30-37&rft.issn=0896-1263&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pubme%3E1750432340%3C/proquest_pubme%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p565-f348038897991d8d9975700bc3aebc5d187dc98379111f476cc8cea2d95a84a53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750432340&rft_id=info:pmid/26677595&rfr_iscdi=true