Loading…

Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities

Abstract Background The type of inguinal hernia repair used depends on many factors but predominantly the surgeon’s training, interpretation of the literature, and personal preference. This prospective cohort study describes a consecutive series of open mesh inguinal hernia repairs (modified Lichten...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The American journal of surgery 2016-01, Vol.211 (1), p.24-30
Main Authors: Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S, Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S, Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng & Ed), F.R.A.C.S, Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S, Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A, Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843
container_end_page 30
container_issue 1
container_start_page 24
container_title The American journal of surgery
container_volume 211
creator Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S
Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S
Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng & Ed), F.R.A.C.S
Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S
Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A
Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S
description Abstract Background The type of inguinal hernia repair used depends on many factors but predominantly the surgeon’s training, interpretation of the literature, and personal preference. This prospective cohort study describes a consecutive series of open mesh inguinal hernia repairs (modified Lichtenstein technique) performed as an outpatient procedure using 2 different mesh types. Methods Analysis was undertaken on 540 consecutive patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 2007 and December 2012. Short-term outcomes were compared between those repaired with conventional polypropylene mesh and those with Parietex ProGrip mesh. Results Most patients were male (89%) and the mean age was 63 years. The median operative time was 50 minutes for unilateral hernias and 90 minutes for bilateral hernias. The use of Parietex ProGrip mesh reduced the operative time to 40 minutes for unilateral hernias ( P < .01) and 75 minutes for bilateral hernias ( P < .01). After unilateral hernia repair, 88% of the patients were discharged home within 4 hours of operation. There was no mortality and the overall complication rate was 7.4%. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus but the remainder of the complications were minor. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, 74% of the patients were either totally pain free or had minimal discomfort. At 4 weeks, 97% of the patients were either pain free or had minimal discomfort. Patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh had the most rapid return to normal activities (10 vs 14 days, P < .04). Conclusions Open anterior inlay mesh repair is safe and results in minimal postoperative pain and early return to normal activities. ProGrip mesh resulted in a shorter operative time and more rapid return to normal activities compared with polypropylene mesh (10 vs 14 days).
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750443080</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0002961015003700</els_id><sourcerecordid>1750443080</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EotvCTwBZ4sIlYezEiXMBVRW0lSpRCThbjjPpOiTxYjtt99_jaBeQeuFgWZa-9zwzbwh5wyBnwKoPQ66nISz-LufARA5lDqx5RjZM1k3GpCyekw0A8KypGJyQ0xCG9GSsLF6SE17xWjQcNuTxer5b7KxHukU_W0097rT19MHGLb3V3mLER3rr3aW3Ozph2FKjl4CBTna2U9J1Nhg39c5HqueO6nF0D4Gi9uM-mcXFzzQ6Oju_wtpEe2-jxfCKvOj1GPD18T4jP758_n5xld18vby-OL_JjGAyZrJF3jIo-8aY2nDd99jLVgN2TVtwVjW9Yb0RUFfApZBoWNcKw5rO6CSVZXFG3h98d979WjBENaWCcRz1jG4JitUCyrIACQl99wQdXCo_VbdSRSm4ZCJR4kAZ70Lw2KudT4Pwe8VArdGoQR2jUWs0CkqVokm6t0f3pZ2w-6v6k0UCPh0ATOO4t-hVMBZng531aKLqnP3vFx-fOJgxpWT0-BP3GP51owJXoL6t-7GuBxMARZ3Ob3wducI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1753452815</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024</source><creator>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S ; Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S ; Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S ; Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S ; Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A ; Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</creator><creatorcontrib>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S ; Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S ; Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S ; Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S ; Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A ; Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The type of inguinal hernia repair used depends on many factors but predominantly the surgeon’s training, interpretation of the literature, and personal preference. This prospective cohort study describes a consecutive series of open mesh inguinal hernia repairs (modified Lichtenstein technique) performed as an outpatient procedure using 2 different mesh types. Methods Analysis was undertaken on 540 consecutive patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 2007 and December 2012. Short-term outcomes were compared between those repaired with conventional polypropylene mesh and those with Parietex ProGrip mesh. Results Most patients were male (89%) and the mean age was 63 years. The median operative time was 50 minutes for unilateral hernias and 90 minutes for bilateral hernias. The use of Parietex ProGrip mesh reduced the operative time to 40 minutes for unilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01) and 75 minutes for bilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01). After unilateral hernia repair, 88% of the patients were discharged home within 4 hours of operation. There was no mortality and the overall complication rate was 7.4%. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus but the remainder of the complications were minor. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, 74% of the patients were either totally pain free or had minimal discomfort. At 4 weeks, 97% of the patients were either pain free or had minimal discomfort. Patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh had the most rapid return to normal activities (10 vs 14 days, P &lt; .04). Conclusions Open anterior inlay mesh repair is safe and results in minimal postoperative pain and early return to normal activities. ProGrip mesh resulted in a shorter operative time and more rapid return to normal activities compared with polypropylene mesh (10 vs 14 days).</description><identifier>ISSN: 0002-9610</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1883</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26275920</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Aged ; Ambulatory ; Analgesics ; Anesthesia ; Collagen ; Female ; Hernia, Inguinal - surgery ; Hernias ; Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation ; Herniorrhaphy - methods ; Hospital costs ; Humans ; Inguinal hernia repair ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Operative Time ; Parietex ProGrip ; Patient satisfaction ; Patients ; Polyesters ; Polypropylenes ; Postoperative Complications ; Prospective Studies ; Recovery of Function ; Surgery ; Surgical Mesh ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>The American journal of surgery, 2016-01, Vol.211 (1), p.24-30</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Jan 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6690-342X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26275920$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><title>Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities</title><title>The American journal of surgery</title><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><description>Abstract Background The type of inguinal hernia repair used depends on many factors but predominantly the surgeon’s training, interpretation of the literature, and personal preference. This prospective cohort study describes a consecutive series of open mesh inguinal hernia repairs (modified Lichtenstein technique) performed as an outpatient procedure using 2 different mesh types. Methods Analysis was undertaken on 540 consecutive patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 2007 and December 2012. Short-term outcomes were compared between those repaired with conventional polypropylene mesh and those with Parietex ProGrip mesh. Results Most patients were male (89%) and the mean age was 63 years. The median operative time was 50 minutes for unilateral hernias and 90 minutes for bilateral hernias. The use of Parietex ProGrip mesh reduced the operative time to 40 minutes for unilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01) and 75 minutes for bilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01). After unilateral hernia repair, 88% of the patients were discharged home within 4 hours of operation. There was no mortality and the overall complication rate was 7.4%. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus but the remainder of the complications were minor. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, 74% of the patients were either totally pain free or had minimal discomfort. At 4 weeks, 97% of the patients were either pain free or had minimal discomfort. Patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh had the most rapid return to normal activities (10 vs 14 days, P &lt; .04). Conclusions Open anterior inlay mesh repair is safe and results in minimal postoperative pain and early return to normal activities. ProGrip mesh resulted in a shorter operative time and more rapid return to normal activities compared with polypropylene mesh (10 vs 14 days).</description><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Ambulatory</subject><subject>Analgesics</subject><subject>Anesthesia</subject><subject>Collagen</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</subject><subject>Hernias</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation</subject><subject>Herniorrhaphy - methods</subject><subject>Hospital costs</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inguinal hernia repair</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Operative Time</subject><subject>Parietex ProGrip</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Polyesters</subject><subject>Polypropylenes</subject><subject>Postoperative Complications</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Recovery of Function</subject><subject>Surgery</subject><subject>Surgical Mesh</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0002-9610</issn><issn>1879-1883</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkkFv1DAQhS0EotvCTwBZ4sIlYezEiXMBVRW0lSpRCThbjjPpOiTxYjtt99_jaBeQeuFgWZa-9zwzbwh5wyBnwKoPQ66nISz-LufARA5lDqx5RjZM1k3GpCyekw0A8KypGJyQ0xCG9GSsLF6SE17xWjQcNuTxer5b7KxHukU_W0097rT19MHGLb3V3mLER3rr3aW3Ozph2FKjl4CBTna2U9J1Nhg39c5HqueO6nF0D4Gi9uM-mcXFzzQ6Oju_wtpEe2-jxfCKvOj1GPD18T4jP758_n5xld18vby-OL_JjGAyZrJF3jIo-8aY2nDd99jLVgN2TVtwVjW9Yb0RUFfApZBoWNcKw5rO6CSVZXFG3h98d979WjBENaWCcRz1jG4JitUCyrIACQl99wQdXCo_VbdSRSm4ZCJR4kAZ70Lw2KudT4Pwe8VArdGoQR2jUWs0CkqVokm6t0f3pZ2w-6v6k0UCPh0ATOO4t-hVMBZng531aKLqnP3vFx-fOJgxpWT0-BP3GP51owJXoL6t-7GuBxMARZ3Ob3wducI</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S</creator><creator>Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S</creator><creator>Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S</creator><creator>Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S</creator><creator>Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A</creator><creator>Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-342X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities</title><author>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S ; Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S ; Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S ; Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S ; Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A ; Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Ambulatory</topic><topic>Analgesics</topic><topic>Anesthesia</topic><topic>Collagen</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hernia, Inguinal - surgery</topic><topic>Hernias</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation</topic><topic>Herniorrhaphy - methods</topic><topic>Hospital costs</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inguinal hernia repair</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Operative Time</topic><topic>Parietex ProGrip</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Polyesters</topic><topic>Polypropylenes</topic><topic>Postoperative Complications</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Recovery of Function</topic><topic>Surgery</topic><topic>Surgical Mesh</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Batabyal, Pikli, M.B.B.S</au><au>Haddad, Richard L., F.R.A.C.S</au><au>Samra, Jaswinder S., D.Phil., F.R.C.S. (Eng &amp; Ed), F.R.A.C.S</au><au>Wickins, Simon, M.B.B.S</au><au>Sweeney, Edmund, F.A.N.Z.C.A</au><au>Hugh, Thomas J., M.D., F.R.A.C.S</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities</atitle><jtitle>The American journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>Am J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>211</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>24</spage><epage>30</epage><pages>24-30</pages><issn>0002-9610</issn><eissn>1879-1883</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The type of inguinal hernia repair used depends on many factors but predominantly the surgeon’s training, interpretation of the literature, and personal preference. This prospective cohort study describes a consecutive series of open mesh inguinal hernia repairs (modified Lichtenstein technique) performed as an outpatient procedure using 2 different mesh types. Methods Analysis was undertaken on 540 consecutive patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair between January 2007 and December 2012. Short-term outcomes were compared between those repaired with conventional polypropylene mesh and those with Parietex ProGrip mesh. Results Most patients were male (89%) and the mean age was 63 years. The median operative time was 50 minutes for unilateral hernias and 90 minutes for bilateral hernias. The use of Parietex ProGrip mesh reduced the operative time to 40 minutes for unilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01) and 75 minutes for bilateral hernias ( P &lt; .01). After unilateral hernia repair, 88% of the patients were discharged home within 4 hours of operation. There was no mortality and the overall complication rate was 7.4%. One patient developed a pulmonary embolus but the remainder of the complications were minor. Twenty-four hours postoperatively, 74% of the patients were either totally pain free or had minimal discomfort. At 4 weeks, 97% of the patients were either pain free or had minimal discomfort. Patients who underwent unilateral inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh had the most rapid return to normal activities (10 vs 14 days, P &lt; .04). Conclusions Open anterior inlay mesh repair is safe and results in minimal postoperative pain and early return to normal activities. ProGrip mesh resulted in a shorter operative time and more rapid return to normal activities compared with polypropylene mesh (10 vs 14 days).</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26275920</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019</doi><tpages>7</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6690-342X</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0002-9610
ispartof The American journal of surgery, 2016-01, Vol.211 (1), p.24-30
issn 0002-9610
1879-1883
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1750443080
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection 2022-2024
subjects Aged
Ambulatory
Analgesics
Anesthesia
Collagen
Female
Hernia, Inguinal - surgery
Hernias
Herniorrhaphy - instrumentation
Herniorrhaphy - methods
Hospital costs
Humans
Inguinal hernia repair
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Parietex ProGrip
Patient satisfaction
Patients
Polyesters
Polypropylenes
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies
Recovery of Function
Surgery
Surgical Mesh
Treatment Outcome
title Inguinal hernia repair with Parietex ProGrip mesh causes minimal discomfort and allows early return to normal activities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T11%3A07%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Inguinal%20hernia%20repair%20with%20Parietex%20ProGrip%20mesh%20causes%20minimal%20discomfort%20and%20allows%20early%20return%20to%20normal%20activities&rft.jtitle=The%20American%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Batabyal,%20Pikli,%20M.B.B.S&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=211&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=24&rft.epage=30&rft.pages=24-30&rft.issn=0002-9610&rft.eissn=1879-1883&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.amjsurg.2015.04.019&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1750443080%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c518t-8be2b104f9cc7c2affef8ba0ed9b32169fc1fc507602858ec1db5c19dca8be843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1753452815&rft_id=info:pmid/26275920&rfr_iscdi=true