Loading…

Environmental management and biological aspects of the two eriophyoid fig mites Aceria ficus (Cotte) and Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer in Egypt

: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anzeiger für Schädlingskunde (Berlin, Germany : 1999) Germany : 1999), 2000-02, Vol.73 (1), p.5-12
Main Authors: Abou‐Awad, By B. A., El‐Sawaf, B. M., Reda, A. S., Abdel‐Khalek, A. A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:: Mites associated with abandoned fig trees in Egypt were observed during a 2‐year study. This study included species diversity and seasonal fluctuations as well as some biological aspects of common eriophyoid species. Three phytophagous species consisted of the fig bud mite Aceria ficus (Cotte), the fig leaf mite Rhyncaphytoptus ficifoliae Keifer and the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae Koch, representing a basic trophic level, were fed upon by three of predacious mites (Pronematus ubiquitus (McGregor), Amblyselus swirskii Athias‐Henriot, Agistemus exsertus Gonzalez). Population abundance of the injurious mites were affected by the prevailing climatic conditions, action of predators and leaf age. A control measure of one summer pesticide (abamectin) application throughout the year seemed to be the most successful management of harmful mites. Life table parameters showed that the population of A. ficus multiplied 28.52 times in a generation time of 17.90 days, while R. ficifoliae population increased 16.50 times in a generation time of 14.61 days. Field and laboratory studies indicated that the viviparity is a typical character in the reproduction of R. ficifoliae.
ISSN:1436-5693
1612-4758
1439-0280
1612-4766
DOI:10.1046/j.1439-0280.2000.00005.x