Loading…

Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?

Determining the impact of urbanisation on baseflow is complex because of the multiplicity of factors that govern subsurface flows. Although many metrics are available to quantify the baseflow regime, the lack of consensus on which metrics need to be used for baseflow characterisation limit their pra...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Hydrological processes 2015-09, Vol.29 (20), p.4367-4378
Main Authors: Hamel, Perrine, Daly, Edoardo, Fletcher, Tim D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063
container_end_page 4378
container_issue 20
container_start_page 4367
container_title Hydrological processes
container_volume 29
creator Hamel, Perrine
Daly, Edoardo
Fletcher, Tim D.
description Determining the impact of urbanisation on baseflow is complex because of the multiplicity of factors that govern subsurface flows. Although many metrics are available to quantify the baseflow regime, the lack of consensus on which metrics need to be used for baseflow characterisation limit their practical application for stormwater management. We performed principal component and correlation analyses on a set of 32 baseflow metrics to identify a subset of non‐redundant metrics for baseflow characterisation. We compared the results for streamflow time series from natural and urban catchments. We found that a subset of five metrics, including at least one metric from each of the four ecologically significant flow characteristic groups (i.e. magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing), explained most of the variability in baseflow regime for both natural and urban catchments. In addition, we analysed the relationship between this set of metrics and some low flow percentiles obtained from flow duration curves. Flow percentiles were only highly correlated to the magnitude and duration metrics, confirming that flow duration curves could be satisfactorily used for baseflow characterisation, but in combination with metrics representing frequency and timing. Metrics based on integration of the flow duration curve, however, cannot simply substitute the consideration of a suite of metrics. We discuss the practicality of our results with a regional regression study; the analyses show how the metrics can be used to quantify the alterations to baseflow caused by urbanisation, and to determine baseflow restoration objectives for urbanised catchments based on pre‐development baseflow regime. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/hyp.10475
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753485147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1717496961</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1LHEEQBuBGImSjHvIPGnJJDhOrZrpnuk8hkUQDahQU9dT0ztS4beZj7drB7L9P65ocAkJOVYfnLSheId4ifESAfH-xXqZFVXpLzBCszRCMfiVmYIzOSjDVa_GG-Q4AFBiYifOrRagXcu6Z2m58kD2tYqhZ8mKcukbOSU5MjQyD9MzEHIZb-QQj3YaeWI6tnOLcD5JXkXzPn3bFdus7pr3nuSMuv329ODjKjn8cfj_4fJzVGkqd6bxubNU0VGkyNdTGYmvzwsyRvDWoS--9VcrkOYBPD3mymKPxqLRGgrLYEe83d5dxvJ-IV64PXFPX-YHGiR1WulBGo6r-g2KlbGlLTPTdP_RunOKQHkkKbDpmVJ7Uh42q48gcqXXLGHof1w7BPfbgUg_uqYdk9zf2IXS0fhm6o5uzP4lskwi8ol9_Ez7-dGVVJHl1euhO8OTsS3Gdu_PiN-mGlqI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1709473842</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hamel, Perrine ; Daly, Edoardo ; Fletcher, Tim D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Perrine ; Daly, Edoardo ; Fletcher, Tim D.</creatorcontrib><description>Determining the impact of urbanisation on baseflow is complex because of the multiplicity of factors that govern subsurface flows. Although many metrics are available to quantify the baseflow regime, the lack of consensus on which metrics need to be used for baseflow characterisation limit their practical application for stormwater management. We performed principal component and correlation analyses on a set of 32 baseflow metrics to identify a subset of non‐redundant metrics for baseflow characterisation. We compared the results for streamflow time series from natural and urban catchments. We found that a subset of five metrics, including at least one metric from each of the four ecologically significant flow characteristic groups (i.e. magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing), explained most of the variability in baseflow regime for both natural and urban catchments. In addition, we analysed the relationship between this set of metrics and some low flow percentiles obtained from flow duration curves. Flow percentiles were only highly correlated to the magnitude and duration metrics, confirming that flow duration curves could be satisfactorily used for baseflow characterisation, but in combination with metrics representing frequency and timing. Metrics based on integration of the flow duration curve, however, cannot simply substitute the consideration of a suite of metrics. We discuss the practicality of our results with a regional regression study; the analyses show how the metrics can be used to quantify the alterations to baseflow caused by urbanisation, and to determine baseflow restoration objectives for urbanised catchments based on pre‐development baseflow regime. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-6087</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1099-1085</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/hyp.10475</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Alterations ; baseflow ; Catchments ; Flow characteristics ; natural flow paradigm ; principal component analysis ; Regression ; Stormwater management ; Time measurements ; Time series ; urban streams ; Victoria (Australia) ; Water runoff</subject><ispartof>Hydrological processes, 2015-09, Vol.29 (20), p.4367-4378</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Perrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Tim D.</creatorcontrib><title>Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?</title><title>Hydrological processes</title><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><description>Determining the impact of urbanisation on baseflow is complex because of the multiplicity of factors that govern subsurface flows. Although many metrics are available to quantify the baseflow regime, the lack of consensus on which metrics need to be used for baseflow characterisation limit their practical application for stormwater management. We performed principal component and correlation analyses on a set of 32 baseflow metrics to identify a subset of non‐redundant metrics for baseflow characterisation. We compared the results for streamflow time series from natural and urban catchments. We found that a subset of five metrics, including at least one metric from each of the four ecologically significant flow characteristic groups (i.e. magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing), explained most of the variability in baseflow regime for both natural and urban catchments. In addition, we analysed the relationship between this set of metrics and some low flow percentiles obtained from flow duration curves. Flow percentiles were only highly correlated to the magnitude and duration metrics, confirming that flow duration curves could be satisfactorily used for baseflow characterisation, but in combination with metrics representing frequency and timing. Metrics based on integration of the flow duration curve, however, cannot simply substitute the consideration of a suite of metrics. We discuss the practicality of our results with a regional regression study; the analyses show how the metrics can be used to quantify the alterations to baseflow caused by urbanisation, and to determine baseflow restoration objectives for urbanised catchments based on pre‐development baseflow regime. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Alterations</subject><subject>baseflow</subject><subject>Catchments</subject><subject>Flow characteristics</subject><subject>natural flow paradigm</subject><subject>principal component analysis</subject><subject>Regression</subject><subject>Stormwater management</subject><subject>Time measurements</subject><subject>Time series</subject><subject>urban streams</subject><subject>Victoria (Australia)</subject><subject>Water runoff</subject><issn>0885-6087</issn><issn>1099-1085</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U1LHEEQBuBGImSjHvIPGnJJDhOrZrpnuk8hkUQDahQU9dT0ztS4beZj7drB7L9P65ocAkJOVYfnLSheId4ifESAfH-xXqZFVXpLzBCszRCMfiVmYIzOSjDVa_GG-Q4AFBiYifOrRagXcu6Z2m58kD2tYqhZ8mKcukbOSU5MjQyD9MzEHIZb-QQj3YaeWI6tnOLcD5JXkXzPn3bFdus7pr3nuSMuv329ODjKjn8cfj_4fJzVGkqd6bxubNU0VGkyNdTGYmvzwsyRvDWoS--9VcrkOYBPD3mymKPxqLRGgrLYEe83d5dxvJ-IV64PXFPX-YHGiR1WulBGo6r-g2KlbGlLTPTdP_RunOKQHkkKbDpmVJ7Uh42q48gcqXXLGHof1w7BPfbgUg_uqYdk9zf2IXS0fhm6o5uzP4lskwi8ol9_Ez7-dGVVJHl1euhO8OTsS3Gdu_PiN-mGlqI</recordid><startdate>20150930</startdate><enddate>20150930</enddate><creator>Hamel, Perrine</creator><creator>Daly, Edoardo</creator><creator>Fletcher, Tim D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7U6</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150930</creationdate><title>Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?</title><author>Hamel, Perrine ; Daly, Edoardo ; Fletcher, Tim D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Alterations</topic><topic>baseflow</topic><topic>Catchments</topic><topic>Flow characteristics</topic><topic>natural flow paradigm</topic><topic>principal component analysis</topic><topic>Regression</topic><topic>Stormwater management</topic><topic>Time measurements</topic><topic>Time series</topic><topic>urban streams</topic><topic>Victoria (Australia)</topic><topic>Water runoff</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hamel, Perrine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Daly, Edoardo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fletcher, Tim D.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological &amp; Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hamel, Perrine</au><au>Daly, Edoardo</au><au>Fletcher, Tim D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?</atitle><jtitle>Hydrological processes</jtitle><addtitle>Hydrol. Process</addtitle><date>2015-09-30</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>20</issue><spage>4367</spage><epage>4378</epage><pages>4367-4378</pages><issn>0885-6087</issn><eissn>1099-1085</eissn><abstract>Determining the impact of urbanisation on baseflow is complex because of the multiplicity of factors that govern subsurface flows. Although many metrics are available to quantify the baseflow regime, the lack of consensus on which metrics need to be used for baseflow characterisation limit their practical application for stormwater management. We performed principal component and correlation analyses on a set of 32 baseflow metrics to identify a subset of non‐redundant metrics for baseflow characterisation. We compared the results for streamflow time series from natural and urban catchments. We found that a subset of five metrics, including at least one metric from each of the four ecologically significant flow characteristic groups (i.e. magnitude, duration, frequency, and timing), explained most of the variability in baseflow regime for both natural and urban catchments. In addition, we analysed the relationship between this set of metrics and some low flow percentiles obtained from flow duration curves. Flow percentiles were only highly correlated to the magnitude and duration metrics, confirming that flow duration curves could be satisfactorily used for baseflow characterisation, but in combination with metrics representing frequency and timing. Metrics based on integration of the flow duration curve, however, cannot simply substitute the consideration of a suite of metrics. We discuss the practicality of our results with a regional regression study; the analyses show how the metrics can be used to quantify the alterations to baseflow caused by urbanisation, and to determine baseflow restoration objectives for urbanised catchments based on pre‐development baseflow regime. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Chichester</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/hyp.10475</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0885-6087
ispartof Hydrological processes, 2015-09, Vol.29 (20), p.4367-4378
issn 0885-6087
1099-1085
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1753485147
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Alterations
baseflow
Catchments
Flow characteristics
natural flow paradigm
principal component analysis
Regression
Stormwater management
Time measurements
Time series
urban streams
Victoria (Australia)
Water runoff
title Which baseflow metrics should be used in assessing flow regimes of urban streams?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T02%3A52%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Which%20baseflow%20metrics%20should%20be%20used%20in%20assessing%20flow%20regimes%20of%20urban%20streams?&rft.jtitle=Hydrological%20processes&rft.au=Hamel,%20Perrine&rft.date=2015-09-30&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=20&rft.spage=4367&rft.epage=4378&rft.pages=4367-4378&rft.issn=0885-6087&rft.eissn=1099-1085&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/hyp.10475&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1717496961%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5065-52cd97dde75e8c0c891f9238b1ea98156aaa94482200a047ae91218a14551e063%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1709473842&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true