Loading…

An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil

An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pest management science 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440
Main Authors: Vieira, Rosana F, Silva, Célia M M S, Maia, Aline H N, Fay, Elisabeth F, Coelho, Kátia C
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193
container_end_page 440
container_issue 5
container_start_page 431
container_title Pest management science
container_volume 56
creator Vieira, Rosana F
Silva, Célia M M S
Maia, Aline H N
Fay, Elisabeth F
Coelho, Kátia C
description An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry
doi_str_mv 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5<431::AID-PS157>3.0.CO;2-U
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17562063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877159299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHSyB0PaQ4j9xHJeBVHWsVBoUaRTQXq48xyEebhzsZGPfnoRWRQIk_GL76tzfubonSV4RPCEY0xdHF8v58phwmqeZlMURxcPhxzyf8pOMkel0tjxNP1wQLl6zCZ7MVy9pur6XHOw77u_fxZeHyaMYrweAlJIeJJtZg1TbBmWjcshXqLI3Bm1MV_syosoH1NXjX8U-mI1pulEzlqq--Tp0tL7tneqsb5BtUPTWoS4Y1ZkS3dquRrp2PviuVs431j1OHlTKRfNkdx8m67M3H-dv0_PVYjmfnac6Y7lICc6vtKYVFyUlvCpoIWWGBWVZmZMq05hTTQqCrzAvCSukYJpIrRjJRCYkkewweb7ltsF_703sYGOjNs6pxvg-AhE8pzhng_DpH8Jr34dmmA1IIQThksoRtxtTBx9jMBW0wW5UuAOCYYwIYIwIxiXDuHDYRgQ8Bw5DRABDRPArImCAYb4CCuuB-2znrqJWrgqq0Tb-hnNWZHwc8tNWdmudufvL-z_W_3LeFgZwugXb2Jkfe7AK3yAXTHD4_H4B7xaSXy7OLqFgPwFOIL6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877159299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5&lt;431::AID-PS157&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMSCFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; chlorothalonil ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi ; ergosterol ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi population ; fungicide ; living hyphal length ; microbial biomass C</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440</ispartof><rights>2000 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1538453$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Célia M M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Aline H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><description>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chlorothalonil</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi</subject><subject>ergosterol</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi population</subject><subject>fungicide</subject><subject>living hyphal length</subject><subject>microbial biomass C</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHSyB0PaQ4j9xHJeBVHWsVBoUaRTQXq48xyEebhzsZGPfnoRWRQIk_GL76tzfubonSV4RPCEY0xdHF8v58phwmqeZlMURxcPhxzyf8pOMkel0tjxNP1wQLl6zCZ7MVy9pur6XHOw77u_fxZeHyaMYrweAlJIeJJtZg1TbBmWjcshXqLI3Bm1MV_syosoH1NXjX8U-mI1pulEzlqq--Tp0tL7tneqsb5BtUPTWoS4Y1ZkS3dquRrp2PviuVs431j1OHlTKRfNkdx8m67M3H-dv0_PVYjmfnac6Y7lICc6vtKYVFyUlvCpoIWWGBWVZmZMq05hTTQqCrzAvCSukYJpIrRjJRCYkkewweb7ltsF_703sYGOjNs6pxvg-AhE8pzhng_DpH8Jr34dmmA1IIQThksoRtxtTBx9jMBW0wW5UuAOCYYwIYIwIxiXDuHDYRgQ8Bw5DRABDRPArImCAYb4CCuuB-2znrqJWrgqq0Tb-hnNWZHwc8tNWdmudufvL-z_W_3LeFgZwugXb2Jkfe7AK3yAXTHD4_H4B7xaSXy7OLqFgPwFOIL6s</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Vieira, Rosana F</creator><creator>Silva, Célia M M S</creator><creator>Maia, Aline H N</creator><creator>Fay, Elisabeth F</creator><creator>Coelho, Kátia C</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>London :John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><author>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chlorothalonil</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi</topic><topic>ergosterol</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi population</topic><topic>fungicide</topic><topic>living hyphal length</topic><topic>microbial biomass C</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Célia M M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Aline H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access &amp; Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira, Rosana F</au><au>Silva, Célia M M S</au><au>Maia, Aline H N</au><au>Fay, Elisabeth F</au><au>Coelho, Kátia C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>431-440</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><coden>PMSCFC</coden><abstract>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results. © 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5&lt;431::AID-PS157&gt;3.0.CO;2-U</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1526-498X
ispartof Pest management science, 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440
issn 1526-498X
1526-4998
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17562063
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
chlorothalonil
Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution
Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi
ergosterol
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
fungi population
fungicide
living hyphal length
microbial biomass C
title An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20appraisal%20of%20five%20methods%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20the%20fungal%20population%20in%20soil%20treated%20with%20chlorothalonil&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Vieira,%20Rosana%20F&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=431-440&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft.coden=PMSCFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5%3C431::AID-PS157%3E3.0.CO;2-U&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877159299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877159299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true