Loading…
An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil
An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergost...
Saved in:
Published in: | Pest management science 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193 |
container_end_page | 440 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 431 |
container_title | Pest management science |
container_volume | 56 |
creator | Vieira, Rosana F Silva, Célia M M S Maia, Aline H N Fay, Elisabeth F Coelho, Kátia C |
description | An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results.
© 2000 Society of Chemical Industry |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5<431::AID-PS157>3.0.CO;2-U |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17562063</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1877159299</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHSyB0PaQ4j9xHJeBVHWsVBoUaRTQXq48xyEebhzsZGPfnoRWRQIk_GL76tzfubonSV4RPCEY0xdHF8v58phwmqeZlMURxcPhxzyf8pOMkel0tjxNP1wQLl6zCZ7MVy9pur6XHOw77u_fxZeHyaMYrweAlJIeJJtZg1TbBmWjcshXqLI3Bm1MV_syosoH1NXjX8U-mI1pulEzlqq--Tp0tL7tneqsb5BtUPTWoS4Y1ZkS3dquRrp2PviuVs431j1OHlTKRfNkdx8m67M3H-dv0_PVYjmfnac6Y7lICc6vtKYVFyUlvCpoIWWGBWVZmZMq05hTTQqCrzAvCSukYJpIrRjJRCYkkewweb7ltsF_703sYGOjNs6pxvg-AhE8pzhng_DpH8Jr34dmmA1IIQThksoRtxtTBx9jMBW0wW5UuAOCYYwIYIwIxiXDuHDYRgQ8Bw5DRABDRPArImCAYb4CCuuB-2znrqJWrgqq0Tb-hnNWZHwc8tNWdmudufvL-z_W_3LeFgZwugXb2Jkfe7AK3yAXTHD4_H4B7xaSXy7OLqFgPwFOIL6s</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1877159299</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</creator><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><description>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results.
© 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</description><identifier>ISSN: 1526-498X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-4998</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5<431::AID-PS157>3.0.CO;2-U</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PMSCFC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; chlorothalonil ; Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution ; Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi ; ergosterol ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; fungi population ; fungicide ; living hyphal length ; microbial biomass C</subject><ispartof>Pest management science, 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440</ispartof><rights>2000 Society of Chemical Industry</rights><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1538453$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Célia M M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Aline H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><title>Pest management science</title><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><description>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results.
© 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>chlorothalonil</subject><subject>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</subject><subject>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi</subject><subject>ergosterol</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>fungi population</subject><subject>fungicide</subject><subject>living hyphal length</subject><subject>microbial biomass C</subject><issn>1526-498X</issn><issn>1526-4998</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkV9v0zAUxSMEEmPwHSyB0PaQ4j9xHJeBVHWsVBoUaRTQXq48xyEebhzsZGPfnoRWRQIk_GL76tzfubonSV4RPCEY0xdHF8v58phwmqeZlMURxcPhxzyf8pOMkel0tjxNP1wQLl6zCZ7MVy9pur6XHOw77u_fxZeHyaMYrweAlJIeJJtZg1TbBmWjcshXqLI3Bm1MV_syosoH1NXjX8U-mI1pulEzlqq--Tp0tL7tneqsb5BtUPTWoS4Y1ZkS3dquRrp2PviuVs431j1OHlTKRfNkdx8m67M3H-dv0_PVYjmfnac6Y7lICc6vtKYVFyUlvCpoIWWGBWVZmZMq05hTTQqCrzAvCSukYJpIrRjJRCYkkewweb7ltsF_703sYGOjNs6pxvg-AhE8pzhng_DpH8Jr34dmmA1IIQThksoRtxtTBx9jMBW0wW5UuAOCYYwIYIwIxiXDuHDYRgQ8Bw5DRABDRPArImCAYb4CCuuB-2znrqJWrgqq0Tb-hnNWZHwc8tNWdmudufvL-z_W_3LeFgZwugXb2Jkfe7AK3yAXTHD4_H4B7xaSXy7OLqFgPwFOIL6s</recordid><startdate>200005</startdate><enddate>200005</enddate><creator>Vieira, Rosana F</creator><creator>Silva, Célia M M S</creator><creator>Maia, Aline H N</creator><creator>Fay, Elisabeth F</creator><creator>Coelho, Kátia C</creator><general>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><general>London :John Wiley & Sons Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7WH</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>P64</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200005</creationdate><title>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</title><author>Vieira, Rosana F ; Silva, Célia M M S ; Maia, Aline H N ; Fay, Elisabeth F ; Coelho, Kátia C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>chlorothalonil</topic><topic>Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution</topic><topic>Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi</topic><topic>ergosterol</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>fungi population</topic><topic>fungicide</topic><topic>living hyphal length</topic><topic>microbial biomass C</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vieira, Rosana F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Silva, Célia M M S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Maia, Aline H N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fay, Elisabeth F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coelho, Kátia C</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 50</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vieira, Rosana F</au><au>Silva, Célia M M S</au><au>Maia, Aline H N</au><au>Fay, Elisabeth F</au><au>Coelho, Kátia C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil</atitle><jtitle>Pest management science</jtitle><addtitle>Pest. Manag. Sci</addtitle><date>2000-05</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>56</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>431</spage><epage>440</epage><pages>431-440</pages><issn>1526-498X</issn><eissn>1526-4998</eissn><coden>PMSCFC</coden><abstract>An experiment was carried out in a greenhouse with the aim of determining an acceptable method to quantify the fungal population in a soil treated with the fungicide chlorothalonil. Doses of the fungicide ranging from 12 to 96 µg AI g−1 soil were applied and microbial biomass carbon (C), soil ergosterol content, living hyphal length, as well as counts of total and cellulolytic fungi colonies, were measured 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 weeks after application. At the end of 16 weeks a new evaluation was done using the three first methods. The microbial biomass C was the least sensitive parameter and, on balance, the living hyphal length was the most sensitive parameter for demonstrating effects of chlorothalonil on the fungal population. Some problems related to the efficiency of the ergosterol content and living hyphal length measurements in the evaluation of the effect of the fungicide on the fungal microflora are discussed, as is the need to compare short‐term (0–5 weeks after treatment) with longer‐term (16 weeks) results.
© 2000 Society of Chemical Industry</abstract><cop>Chichester, UK</cop><pub>John Wiley & Sons, Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5<431::AID-PS157>3.0.CO;2-U</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1526-498X |
ispartof | Pest management science, 2000-05, Vol.56 (5), p.431-440 |
issn | 1526-498X 1526-4998 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17562063 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Biological and medical sciences chlorothalonil Ecotoxicology, biological effects of pollution Effects of pollution and side effects of pesticides on plants and fungi ergosterol Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology fungi population fungicide living hyphal length microbial biomass C |
title | An appraisal of five methods for the measurement of the fungal population in soil treated with chlorothalonil |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T07%3A57%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20appraisal%20of%20five%20methods%20for%20the%20measurement%20of%20the%20fungal%20population%20in%20soil%20treated%20with%20chlorothalonil&rft.jtitle=Pest%20management%20science&rft.au=Vieira,%20Rosana%20F&rft.date=2000-05&rft.volume=56&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=431&rft.epage=440&rft.pages=431-440&rft.issn=1526-498X&rft.eissn=1526-4998&rft.coden=PMSCFC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/(SICI)1526-4998(200005)56:5%3C431::AID-PS157%3E3.0.CO;2-U&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1877159299%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4367-106bcc2f57d215f82899407234d61f4c052c1810b05d138973c19ca3147479193%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1877159299&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |