Loading…
Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation
As a fine-scale, manipulative model experiment leaf litter was added in plots to increase habitat heterogeneity in a 50-year-old Norway spruce plantation, established after the clear-cutting of a native beech forest, during a 2-year period in the Hungarian Mountain Range. Pitfall trap catches of car...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biodiversity and conservation 2005-02, Vol.14 (2), p.475-491 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43 |
container_end_page | 491 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 475 |
container_title | Biodiversity and conservation |
container_volume | 14 |
creator | Magura, Tibor Tóthmérész, Béla Elek, Zoltán |
description | As a fine-scale, manipulative model experiment leaf litter was added in plots to increase habitat heterogeneity in a 50-year-old Norway spruce plantation, established after the clear-cutting of a native beech forest, during a 2-year period in the Hungarian Mountain Range. Pitfall trap catches of carabids from leaf-litter plots were compared with those from control plots to explore the effect of leaf-litter addition. Difference in the species composition was revealed by ordination; scores of the samples of the two plot types were significantly separated along the first MDS axis. The most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus) was significantly more abundant in the leaf-litter plots. However, there were no significant differences for the other most frequently obtained species. Habitat generalist species were the most abundant, followed by forest generalists, then forest specialists, and there were some open habitat species. Enhanced habitat heterogeneity (leaf-litter addition) in homogeneous plantations influenced the spatial distribution and composition of carabids, through altered abiotic (lower ground temperature in the leaf-litter plots) and biotic (more prey items) factors. Differences in abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were not significant between the control and the manipulated plots, although carabid catch was higher in the leaf-litter plots during both years. Forestry practices to increase habitat heterogeneity should be considered to enhance biodiversity in managed forests.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17579794</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2142499571</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFhbvovU3TNEspPgYGdKHrkOYBGTrtmGQW_ntTxpVw4W6-czh8hNwiPCCAeEwInCEFaKhgIGh3RlbIRU2lQDgnK5AtUIbIL8lVSjsoGd7iivSb_UGbnKrZV1unPR1Dzi5WT9aGHOapKtfrqIdgUxWmSlf9PAVfiI9RT1kvzDW58HpM7ubvr8nXy_Nn_0a376-b_mlLDWtlprYG5j1Iy6SQjZBg20Y2ODjU3hvLBsdMy1tgABKkkQ3n9TBo9LVhndUNW5P7U-8hzt9Hl7Lah2TcWIa4-ZgUCi6W6gLe_QN38zFOZZsSHLu6lYwXCE-QiXNK0Xl1iGGv449CUItTdXKqilO1OFUd-wUF2WfK</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>751826935</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Magura, Tibor ; Tóthmérész, Béla ; Elek, Zoltán</creator><creatorcontrib>Magura, Tibor ; Tóthmérész, Béla ; Elek, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><description>As a fine-scale, manipulative model experiment leaf litter was added in plots to increase habitat heterogeneity in a 50-year-old Norway spruce plantation, established after the clear-cutting of a native beech forest, during a 2-year period in the Hungarian Mountain Range. Pitfall trap catches of carabids from leaf-litter plots were compared with those from control plots to explore the effect of leaf-litter addition. Difference in the species composition was revealed by ordination; scores of the samples of the two plot types were significantly separated along the first MDS axis. The most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus) was significantly more abundant in the leaf-litter plots. However, there were no significant differences for the other most frequently obtained species. Habitat generalist species were the most abundant, followed by forest generalists, then forest specialists, and there were some open habitat species. Enhanced habitat heterogeneity (leaf-litter addition) in homogeneous plantations influenced the spatial distribution and composition of carabids, through altered abiotic (lower ground temperature in the leaf-litter plots) and biotic (more prey items) factors. Differences in abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were not significant between the control and the manipulated plots, although carabid catch was higher in the leaf-litter plots during both years. Forestry practices to increase habitat heterogeneity should be considered to enhance biodiversity in managed forests.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0960-3115</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9710</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Nature B.V</publisher><subject>Clearcutting ; Forest management ; Habitats ; Heterogeneity ; Leaf litter ; Leaves ; Ordination ; Picea abies ; Pine trees ; Plantations ; Pterostichus oblongopunctatus ; Spatial distribution ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Species richness</subject><ispartof>Biodiversity and conservation, 2005-02, Vol.14 (2), p.475-491</ispartof><rights>Springer 2005</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Magura, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóthmérész, Béla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elek, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><title>Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation</title><title>Biodiversity and conservation</title><description>As a fine-scale, manipulative model experiment leaf litter was added in plots to increase habitat heterogeneity in a 50-year-old Norway spruce plantation, established after the clear-cutting of a native beech forest, during a 2-year period in the Hungarian Mountain Range. Pitfall trap catches of carabids from leaf-litter plots were compared with those from control plots to explore the effect of leaf-litter addition. Difference in the species composition was revealed by ordination; scores of the samples of the two plot types were significantly separated along the first MDS axis. The most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus) was significantly more abundant in the leaf-litter plots. However, there were no significant differences for the other most frequently obtained species. Habitat generalist species were the most abundant, followed by forest generalists, then forest specialists, and there were some open habitat species. Enhanced habitat heterogeneity (leaf-litter addition) in homogeneous plantations influenced the spatial distribution and composition of carabids, through altered abiotic (lower ground temperature in the leaf-litter plots) and biotic (more prey items) factors. Differences in abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were not significant between the control and the manipulated plots, although carabid catch was higher in the leaf-litter plots during both years. Forestry practices to increase habitat heterogeneity should be considered to enhance biodiversity in managed forests.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Clearcutting</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Heterogeneity</subject><subject>Leaf litter</subject><subject>Leaves</subject><subject>Ordination</subject><subject>Picea abies</subject><subject>Pine trees</subject><subject>Plantations</subject><subject>Pterostichus oblongopunctatus</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><issn>0960-3115</issn><issn>1572-9710</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkEtLxDAUhYMoOI7-AHfFhbvovU3TNEspPgYGdKHrkOYBGTrtmGQW_ntTxpVw4W6-czh8hNwiPCCAeEwInCEFaKhgIGh3RlbIRU2lQDgnK5AtUIbIL8lVSjsoGd7iivSb_UGbnKrZV1unPR1Dzi5WT9aGHOapKtfrqIdgUxWmSlf9PAVfiI9RT1kvzDW58HpM7ubvr8nXy_Nn_0a376-b_mlLDWtlprYG5j1Iy6SQjZBg20Y2ODjU3hvLBsdMy1tgABKkkQ3n9TBo9LVhndUNW5P7U-8hzt9Hl7Lah2TcWIa4-ZgUCi6W6gLe_QN38zFOZZsSHLu6lYwXCE-QiXNK0Xl1iGGv449CUItTdXKqilO1OFUd-wUF2WfK</recordid><startdate>20050201</startdate><enddate>20050201</enddate><creator>Magura, Tibor</creator><creator>Tóthmérész, Béla</creator><creator>Elek, Zoltán</creator><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>RC3</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20050201</creationdate><title>Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation</title><author>Magura, Tibor ; Tóthmérész, Béla ; Elek, Zoltán</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Clearcutting</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Heterogeneity</topic><topic>Leaf litter</topic><topic>Leaves</topic><topic>Ordination</topic><topic>Picea abies</topic><topic>Pine trees</topic><topic>Plantations</topic><topic>Pterostichus oblongopunctatus</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Magura, Tibor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tóthmérész, Béla</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elek, Zoltán</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Science Journals</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Genetics Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Magura, Tibor</au><au>Tóthmérész, Béla</au><au>Elek, Zoltán</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation</atitle><jtitle>Biodiversity and conservation</jtitle><date>2005-02-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>475</spage><epage>491</epage><pages>475-491</pages><issn>0960-3115</issn><eissn>1572-9710</eissn><abstract>As a fine-scale, manipulative model experiment leaf litter was added in plots to increase habitat heterogeneity in a 50-year-old Norway spruce plantation, established after the clear-cutting of a native beech forest, during a 2-year period in the Hungarian Mountain Range. Pitfall trap catches of carabids from leaf-litter plots were compared with those from control plots to explore the effect of leaf-litter addition. Difference in the species composition was revealed by ordination; scores of the samples of the two plot types were significantly separated along the first MDS axis. The most numerous species (Pterostichus oblongopunctatus) was significantly more abundant in the leaf-litter plots. However, there were no significant differences for the other most frequently obtained species. Habitat generalist species were the most abundant, followed by forest generalists, then forest specialists, and there were some open habitat species. Enhanced habitat heterogeneity (leaf-litter addition) in homogeneous plantations influenced the spatial distribution and composition of carabids, through altered abiotic (lower ground temperature in the leaf-litter plots) and biotic (more prey items) factors. Differences in abundance, species richness and Shannon diversity were not significant between the control and the manipulated plots, although carabid catch was higher in the leaf-litter plots during both years. Forestry practices to increase habitat heterogeneity should be considered to enhance biodiversity in managed forests.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Nature B.V</pub><doi>10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0960-3115 |
ispartof | Biodiversity and conservation, 2005-02, Vol.14 (2), p.475-491 |
issn | 0960-3115 1572-9710 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17579794 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Clearcutting Forest management Habitats Heterogeneity Leaf litter Leaves Ordination Picea abies Pine trees Plantations Pterostichus oblongopunctatus Spatial distribution Species composition Species diversity Species richness |
title | Impacts of Leaf-litter Addition on Carabids in a Conifer Plantation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T11%3A04%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Impacts%20of%20Leaf-litter%20Addition%20on%20Carabids%20in%20a%20Conifer%20Plantation&rft.jtitle=Biodiversity%20and%20conservation&rft.au=Magura,%20Tibor&rft.date=2005-02-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=475&rft.epage=491&rft.pages=475-491&rft.issn=0960-3115&rft.eissn=1572-9710&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10531-004-7307-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2142499571%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c369t-d203ff09d39794790d64941be1affcd3be3c6560300909c94552bba1f2c38da43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=751826935&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |