Loading…

Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach

Landfill odors have created a major concern for the Chinese public. Based on the combination of a first order decay (FOD) model and a ground-level point source Gaussian dispersion model, the impacts from odors emitted from the 1955 landfills in China are evaluated in this paper. Our bottom-up approa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of environmental management 2015-12, Vol.164, p.206-214
Main Authors: Cai, Bofeng, Wang, Jinnan, Long, Ying, Li, Wanxin, Liu, Jianguo, Ni, Zhe, Bo, Xin, Li, Dong, Wang, Jianghao, Chen, Xuejing, Gao, Qingxian, Zhang, Lixiao
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423
container_end_page 214
container_issue
container_start_page 206
container_title Journal of environmental management
container_volume 164
creator Cai, Bofeng
Wang, Jinnan
Long, Ying
Li, Wanxin
Liu, Jianguo
Ni, Zhe
Bo, Xin
Li, Dong
Wang, Jianghao
Chen, Xuejing
Gao, Qingxian
Zhang, Lixiao
description Landfill odors have created a major concern for the Chinese public. Based on the combination of a first order decay (FOD) model and a ground-level point source Gaussian dispersion model, the impacts from odors emitted from the 1955 landfills in China are evaluated in this paper. Our bottom-up approach uses basic data related to each landfill to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of impact of landfill odors. Results reveal that the average radius of impact of landfill odors in China is 796 m, while most landfills (46.85%) are within the range of 400–1000 m, in line with the results from previous studies. The total land area impacted by odors has reached 837,476 ha, accounting for 0.09% of China's land territory. Guangdong and Sichuan provinces have the largest land areas impacted by odors, while Tibet Autonomous Region and Tianjin Municipality have the smallest. According to the CALPUFF (California Puff) model and an analysis of social big data, the overall uncertainty of our calculation of the range of odor impacts is roughly −32.88% to 32.67%. This type of study is essential for gaining an accurate and detailed estimation of the affected human population and will prove valuable for addressing the current Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) challenge in China. •The ranges of the impact of odors from China's 1955 landfills are evaluated.•The CALPUFF model is used to assess the uncertainty of the analysis results.•Large social media datasets reveal how people perceive landfill odors.•Landfill odors impacted 837476 ha with a range of uncertainty of −32.88% to 32.67%.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.009
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758942018</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0301479715302619</els_id><sourcerecordid>3922209411</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkb2O1DAURi0EYmcXHgFkiYYm4dqOHbtCaLSwSCvRQENjefzDOEriYCcj7duTMAMFDVu58PnuZ9-D0CsCNQEi3nV158fTYMaaAuE1qBpAPUE7AopXUjB4inbAgFRNq9ordF1KBwCMkvY5uqKCKckbtUPfb0-mX8wcxx94Pnoch8nYGaeAk0u54JDT8PuCKM5xb0YXYt8XHEe8P8bR4KVsUYMPaZ7TUC0TNtOUk7HHF-hZMH3xLy_nDfr28fbr_q66__Lp8_7DfWU5iLlyxHJrGiOlI9RzHrxwjXSBgRWioYoqBUF4Z3lLaWiUIhSMkwF8ewisoewGvT3PXWt_Lr7MeojF-n59rE9L0aTlUjXrluQjUNoKJaGBx6BEEQmUreibf9AuLXlc_7x1t8AEZVs3P1M2p1KyD3rKcTD5QRPQm1Ld6YtSvSnVoPSqdM29vkxfDoN3f1N_HK7A-zPg1yWfos-62OhH613M3s7apfifil-ZI7Ix</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1757036238</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Cai, Bofeng ; Wang, Jinnan ; Long, Ying ; Li, Wanxin ; Liu, Jianguo ; Ni, Zhe ; Bo, Xin ; Li, Dong ; Wang, Jianghao ; Chen, Xuejing ; Gao, Qingxian ; Zhang, Lixiao</creator><creatorcontrib>Cai, Bofeng ; Wang, Jinnan ; Long, Ying ; Li, Wanxin ; Liu, Jianguo ; Ni, Zhe ; Bo, Xin ; Li, Dong ; Wang, Jianghao ; Chen, Xuejing ; Gao, Qingxian ; Zhang, Lixiao</creatorcontrib><description>Landfill odors have created a major concern for the Chinese public. Based on the combination of a first order decay (FOD) model and a ground-level point source Gaussian dispersion model, the impacts from odors emitted from the 1955 landfills in China are evaluated in this paper. Our bottom-up approach uses basic data related to each landfill to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of impact of landfill odors. Results reveal that the average radius of impact of landfill odors in China is 796 m, while most landfills (46.85%) are within the range of 400–1000 m, in line with the results from previous studies. The total land area impacted by odors has reached 837,476 ha, accounting for 0.09% of China's land territory. Guangdong and Sichuan provinces have the largest land areas impacted by odors, while Tibet Autonomous Region and Tianjin Municipality have the smallest. According to the CALPUFF (California Puff) model and an analysis of social big data, the overall uncertainty of our calculation of the range of odor impacts is roughly −32.88% to 32.67%. This type of study is essential for gaining an accurate and detailed estimation of the affected human population and will prove valuable for addressing the current Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) challenge in China. •The ranges of the impact of odors from China's 1955 landfills are evaluated.•The CALPUFF model is used to assess the uncertainty of the analysis results.•Large social media datasets reveal how people perceive landfill odors.•Landfill odors impacted 837476 ha with a range of uncertainty of −32.88% to 32.67%.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0301-4797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-8630</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.009</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26398549</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEVMAW</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis ; Bottom-up ; China ; Environmental impact ; Environmental impact studies ; Environmental management ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; Environmental testing ; Guangdong China ; Humans ; Landfill ; Models, Theoretical ; Odor impact ranges ; Odorants - analysis ; Odors ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; Refuse Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data ; Sichuan China ; Tibet ; Uncertainty evaluation ; Waste Disposal Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><ispartof>Journal of environmental management, 2015-12, Vol.164, p.206-214</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Academic Press Ltd. Dec 1, 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5333-3827</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222,33223</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26398549$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cai, Bofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bo, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuejing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lixiao</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach</title><title>Journal of environmental management</title><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Landfill odors have created a major concern for the Chinese public. Based on the combination of a first order decay (FOD) model and a ground-level point source Gaussian dispersion model, the impacts from odors emitted from the 1955 landfills in China are evaluated in this paper. Our bottom-up approach uses basic data related to each landfill to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of impact of landfill odors. Results reveal that the average radius of impact of landfill odors in China is 796 m, while most landfills (46.85%) are within the range of 400–1000 m, in line with the results from previous studies. The total land area impacted by odors has reached 837,476 ha, accounting for 0.09% of China's land territory. Guangdong and Sichuan provinces have the largest land areas impacted by odors, while Tibet Autonomous Region and Tianjin Municipality have the smallest. According to the CALPUFF (California Puff) model and an analysis of social big data, the overall uncertainty of our calculation of the range of odor impacts is roughly −32.88% to 32.67%. This type of study is essential for gaining an accurate and detailed estimation of the affected human population and will prove valuable for addressing the current Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) challenge in China. •The ranges of the impact of odors from China's 1955 landfills are evaluated.•The CALPUFF model is used to assess the uncertainty of the analysis results.•Large social media datasets reveal how people perceive landfill odors.•Landfill odors impacted 837476 ha with a range of uncertainty of −32.88% to 32.67%.</description><subject>Air Pollutants - analysis</subject><subject>Bottom-up</subject><subject>China</subject><subject>Environmental impact</subject><subject>Environmental impact studies</subject><subject>Environmental management</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>Environmental testing</subject><subject>Guangdong China</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Landfill</subject><subject>Models, Theoretical</subject><subject>Odor impact ranges</subject><subject>Odorants - analysis</subject><subject>Odors</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><subject>Sichuan China</subject><subject>Tibet</subject><subject>Uncertainty evaluation</subject><subject>Waste Disposal Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</subject><issn>0301-4797</issn><issn>1095-8630</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkb2O1DAURi0EYmcXHgFkiYYm4dqOHbtCaLSwSCvRQENjefzDOEriYCcj7duTMAMFDVu58PnuZ9-D0CsCNQEi3nV158fTYMaaAuE1qBpAPUE7AopXUjB4inbAgFRNq9ordF1KBwCMkvY5uqKCKckbtUPfb0-mX8wcxx94Pnoch8nYGaeAk0u54JDT8PuCKM5xb0YXYt8XHEe8P8bR4KVsUYMPaZ7TUC0TNtOUk7HHF-hZMH3xLy_nDfr28fbr_q66__Lp8_7DfWU5iLlyxHJrGiOlI9RzHrxwjXSBgRWioYoqBUF4Z3lLaWiUIhSMkwF8ewisoewGvT3PXWt_Lr7MeojF-n59rE9L0aTlUjXrluQjUNoKJaGBx6BEEQmUreibf9AuLXlc_7x1t8AEZVs3P1M2p1KyD3rKcTD5QRPQm1Ld6YtSvSnVoPSqdM29vkxfDoN3f1N_HK7A-zPg1yWfos-62OhH613M3s7apfifil-ZI7Ix</recordid><startdate>20151201</startdate><enddate>20151201</enddate><creator>Cai, Bofeng</creator><creator>Wang, Jinnan</creator><creator>Long, Ying</creator><creator>Li, Wanxin</creator><creator>Liu, Jianguo</creator><creator>Ni, Zhe</creator><creator>Bo, Xin</creator><creator>Li, Dong</creator><creator>Wang, Jianghao</creator><creator>Chen, Xuejing</creator><creator>Gao, Qingxian</creator><creator>Zhang, Lixiao</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Academic Press Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-3827</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20151201</creationdate><title>Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach</title><author>Cai, Bofeng ; Wang, Jinnan ; Long, Ying ; Li, Wanxin ; Liu, Jianguo ; Ni, Zhe ; Bo, Xin ; Li, Dong ; Wang, Jianghao ; Chen, Xuejing ; Gao, Qingxian ; Zhang, Lixiao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Air Pollutants - analysis</topic><topic>Bottom-up</topic><topic>China</topic><topic>Environmental impact</topic><topic>Environmental impact studies</topic><topic>Environmental management</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>Environmental testing</topic><topic>Guangdong China</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Landfill</topic><topic>Models, Theoretical</topic><topic>Odor impact ranges</topic><topic>Odorants - analysis</topic><topic>Odors</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><topic>Sichuan China</topic><topic>Tibet</topic><topic>Uncertainty evaluation</topic><topic>Waste Disposal Facilities - statistics &amp; numerical data</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cai, Bofeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jinnan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Long, Ying</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Wanxin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Jianguo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ni, Zhe</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bo, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Jianghao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Xuejing</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gao, Qingxian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Lixiao</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution &amp; Environmental Quality</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cai, Bofeng</au><au>Wang, Jinnan</au><au>Long, Ying</au><au>Li, Wanxin</au><au>Liu, Jianguo</au><au>Ni, Zhe</au><au>Bo, Xin</au><au>Li, Dong</au><au>Wang, Jianghao</au><au>Chen, Xuejing</au><au>Gao, Qingxian</au><au>Zhang, Lixiao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach</atitle><jtitle>Journal of environmental management</jtitle><addtitle>J Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2015-12-01</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>164</volume><spage>206</spage><epage>214</epage><pages>206-214</pages><issn>0301-4797</issn><eissn>1095-8630</eissn><coden>JEVMAW</coden><abstract>Landfill odors have created a major concern for the Chinese public. Based on the combination of a first order decay (FOD) model and a ground-level point source Gaussian dispersion model, the impacts from odors emitted from the 1955 landfills in China are evaluated in this paper. Our bottom-up approach uses basic data related to each landfill to achieve a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of impact of landfill odors. Results reveal that the average radius of impact of landfill odors in China is 796 m, while most landfills (46.85%) are within the range of 400–1000 m, in line with the results from previous studies. The total land area impacted by odors has reached 837,476 ha, accounting for 0.09% of China's land territory. Guangdong and Sichuan provinces have the largest land areas impacted by odors, while Tibet Autonomous Region and Tianjin Municipality have the smallest. According to the CALPUFF (California Puff) model and an analysis of social big data, the overall uncertainty of our calculation of the range of odor impacts is roughly −32.88% to 32.67%. This type of study is essential for gaining an accurate and detailed estimation of the affected human population and will prove valuable for addressing the current Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) challenge in China. •The ranges of the impact of odors from China's 1955 landfills are evaluated.•The CALPUFF model is used to assess the uncertainty of the analysis results.•Large social media datasets reveal how people perceive landfill odors.•Landfill odors impacted 837476 ha with a range of uncertainty of −32.88% to 32.67%.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26398549</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.009</doi><tpages>9</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5333-3827</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0301-4797
ispartof Journal of environmental management, 2015-12, Vol.164, p.206-214
issn 0301-4797
1095-8630
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1758942018
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier
subjects Air Pollutants - analysis
Bottom-up
China
Environmental impact
Environmental impact studies
Environmental management
Environmental Monitoring - methods
Environmental testing
Guangdong China
Humans
Landfill
Models, Theoretical
Odor impact ranges
Odorants - analysis
Odors
Refuse Disposal - methods
Refuse Disposal - statistics & numerical data
Sichuan China
Tibet
Uncertainty evaluation
Waste Disposal Facilities - statistics & numerical data
title Evaluating the impact of odors from the 1955 landfills in China using a bottom-up approach
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T06%3A46%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluating%20the%20impact%20of%20odors%20from%20the%201955%20landfills%20in%20China%20using%20a%20bottom-up%20approach&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20environmental%20management&rft.au=Cai,%20Bofeng&rft.date=2015-12-01&rft.volume=164&rft.spage=206&rft.epage=214&rft.pages=206-214&rft.issn=0301-4797&rft.eissn=1095-8630&rft.coden=JEVMAW&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3922209411%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c506t-d1c5ca4a88d12e55fe6d48df30c664292990f6edc5722f499120ad8f0e7bf3423%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1757036238&rft_id=info:pmid/26398549&rfr_iscdi=true