A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall

The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons proble...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in water resources 2004-10, Vol.27 (10), p.967-980
Main Authors: Habib, Emad, Ciach, Grzegorz J., Krajewski, Witold F.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Applied geophysics
Area-point errors
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
hydrologic models
Hydrology
Hydrology. Hydrogeology
Internal geophysics
Monte Carlo method
radar
Radar rainfall
rain
rain gauges
Rainfall verification
Raingauge
watershed hydrology
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons problematic. The purpose of the CDT method is to filter out the raingauge representativeness errors from radar–raingauge verification samples. Our objective is to test the validity and evaluate the accuracy of this method. These analyses are based on two large data samples from high-density research networks covering the Goodwin Creek watershed in Mississippi and the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma. An example implementation in a quasi operational situation is also presented, and sample size requirements are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Our tests indicate that the CDT method performs with satisfactory accuracy and can considerably improve on the currently applied RR verification practices.
ISSN:0309-1708
1872-9657
DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003