Loading…
A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall
The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons proble...
Saved in:
Published in: | Advances in water resources 2004-10, Vol.27 (10), p.967-980 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3 |
container_end_page | 980 |
container_issue | 10 |
container_start_page | 967 |
container_title | Advances in water resources |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Habib, Emad Ciach, Grzegorz J. Krajewski, Witold F. |
description | The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons problematic. The purpose of the CDT method is to filter out the raingauge representativeness errors from radar–raingauge verification samples. Our objective is to test the validity and evaluate the accuracy of this method. These analyses are based on two large data samples from high-density research networks covering the Goodwin Creek watershed in Mississippi and the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma. An example implementation in a quasi operational situation is also presented, and sample size requirements are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Our tests indicate that the CDT method performs with satisfactory accuracy and can considerably improve on the currently applied RR verification practices. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17593898</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0309170804001162</els_id><sourcerecordid>17593898</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhSMEUpfS31Bf4JZ0HCexc1xVUJAq9QA9W157vPUqGy9jZxFXfjlebdVy4zQz8vfeWG-q6ppDw4EPN7vGuOMvkwlT0wJ0DagGQLypVlzJth6HXr6tViBgrLkEdVG9T2kHAKqT7ar6s2Z7zE_RMR-J-TBlpDBvWVwyI1M6s2yRER6KPc7Z5HDEGVNiSBQpMU9xz_ITsmPR-WALEGfmQsoUNstpSCz6YuUMMTO7f01L5800fajelZLw6rleVo9fPv-4_VrfP9x9u13f11aMKte2F14MHoeuHZzYeOuNbJWQXjjJ-27ouCsPIBUo3ppxMwy2B_TQua7HohOX1aez74HizwVT1vuQLE6TmTEuSXPZj0KNqoDyDFqKKRF6faCwN_Rbc9CnzPVOv2SuT5lrULpkXpQfn1eYZM3kycw2pFf50La8Uyfu-sx5E7XZUmEev7fABcCoZLlNIdZnAksix4Ckkw04W3SB0GbtYvjvb_4CYUOo5w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17593898</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Habib, Emad ; Ciach, Grzegorz J. ; Krajewski, Witold F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Habib, Emad ; Ciach, Grzegorz J. ; Krajewski, Witold F.</creatorcontrib><description>The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons problematic. The purpose of the CDT method is to filter out the raingauge representativeness errors from radar–raingauge verification samples. Our objective is to test the validity and evaluate the accuracy of this method. These analyses are based on two large data samples from high-density research networks covering the Goodwin Creek watershed in Mississippi and the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma. An example implementation in a quasi operational situation is also presented, and sample size requirements are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Our tests indicate that the CDT method performs with satisfactory accuracy and can considerably improve on the currently applied RR verification practices.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0309-1708</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9657</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AWREDI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied geophysics ; Area-point errors ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; hydrologic models ; Hydrology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Internal geophysics ; Monte Carlo method ; radar ; Radar rainfall ; rain ; rain gauges ; Rainfall verification ; Raingauge ; watershed hydrology</subject><ispartof>Advances in water resources, 2004-10, Vol.27 (10), p.967-980</ispartof><rights>2004 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=16221483$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Habib, Emad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciach, Grzegorz J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajewski, Witold F.</creatorcontrib><title>A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall</title><title>Advances in water resources</title><description>The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons problematic. The purpose of the CDT method is to filter out the raingauge representativeness errors from radar–raingauge verification samples. Our objective is to test the validity and evaluate the accuracy of this method. These analyses are based on two large data samples from high-density research networks covering the Goodwin Creek watershed in Mississippi and the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma. An example implementation in a quasi operational situation is also presented, and sample size requirements are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Our tests indicate that the CDT method performs with satisfactory accuracy and can considerably improve on the currently applied RR verification practices.</description><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Area-point errors</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>hydrologic models</subject><subject>Hydrology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Monte Carlo method</subject><subject>radar</subject><subject>Radar rainfall</subject><subject>rain</subject><subject>rain gauges</subject><subject>Rainfall verification</subject><subject>Raingauge</subject><subject>watershed hydrology</subject><issn>0309-1708</issn><issn>1872-9657</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkUFv1DAQhSMEUpfS31Bf4JZ0HCexc1xVUJAq9QA9W157vPUqGy9jZxFXfjlebdVy4zQz8vfeWG-q6ppDw4EPN7vGuOMvkwlT0wJ0DagGQLypVlzJth6HXr6tViBgrLkEdVG9T2kHAKqT7ar6s2Z7zE_RMR-J-TBlpDBvWVwyI1M6s2yRER6KPc7Z5HDEGVNiSBQpMU9xz_ITsmPR-WALEGfmQsoUNstpSCz6YuUMMTO7f01L5800fajelZLw6rleVo9fPv-4_VrfP9x9u13f11aMKte2F14MHoeuHZzYeOuNbJWQXjjJ-27ouCsPIBUo3ppxMwy2B_TQua7HohOX1aez74HizwVT1vuQLE6TmTEuSXPZj0KNqoDyDFqKKRF6faCwN_Rbc9CnzPVOv2SuT5lrULpkXpQfn1eYZM3kycw2pFf50La8Uyfu-sx5E7XZUmEev7fABcCoZLlNIdZnAksix4Ckkw04W3SB0GbtYvjvb_4CYUOo5w</recordid><startdate>20041001</startdate><enddate>20041001</enddate><creator>Habib, Emad</creator><creator>Ciach, Grzegorz J.</creator><creator>Krajewski, Witold F.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Science</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>KL.</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20041001</creationdate><title>A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall</title><author>Habib, Emad ; Ciach, Grzegorz J. ; Krajewski, Witold F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Area-point errors</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>hydrologic models</topic><topic>Hydrology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Monte Carlo method</topic><topic>radar</topic><topic>Radar rainfall</topic><topic>rain</topic><topic>rain gauges</topic><topic>Rainfall verification</topic><topic>Raingauge</topic><topic>watershed hydrology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Habib, Emad</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciach, Grzegorz J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krajewski, Witold F.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><jtitle>Advances in water resources</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Habib, Emad</au><au>Ciach, Grzegorz J.</au><au>Krajewski, Witold F.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall</atitle><jtitle>Advances in water resources</jtitle><date>2004-10-01</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>967</spage><epage>980</epage><pages>967-980</pages><issn>0309-1708</issn><eissn>1872-9657</eissn><coden>AWREDI</coden><abstract>The study presents a conditional distribution transformation (CDT) method for improving radar rainfall (RR) verifications that use sparse raingauge networks as the ground reference (GR). Large differences between the sampling areas of radar and raingauge measurements render direct comparisons problematic. The purpose of the CDT method is to filter out the raingauge representativeness errors from radar–raingauge verification samples. Our objective is to test the validity and evaluate the accuracy of this method. These analyses are based on two large data samples from high-density research networks covering the Goodwin Creek watershed in Mississippi and the Little Washita watershed in Oklahoma. An example implementation in a quasi operational situation is also presented, and sample size requirements are investigated using Monte Carlo simulations. Our tests indicate that the CDT method performs with satisfactory accuracy and can considerably improve on the currently applied RR verification practices.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0309-1708 |
ispartof | Advances in water resources, 2004-10, Vol.27 (10), p.967-980 |
issn | 0309-1708 1872-9657 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17593898 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Applied geophysics Area-point errors Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology hydrologic models Hydrology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Internal geophysics Monte Carlo method radar Radar rainfall rain rain gauges Rainfall verification Raingauge watershed hydrology |
title | A method for filtering out raingauge representativeness errors from the verification distributions of radar and raingauge rainfall |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T23%3A14%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20method%20for%20filtering%20out%20raingauge%20representativeness%20errors%20from%20the%20verification%20distributions%20of%20radar%20and%20raingauge%20rainfall&rft.jtitle=Advances%20in%20water%20resources&rft.au=Habib,%20Emad&rft.date=2004-10-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=967&rft.epage=980&rft.pages=967-980&rft.issn=0309-1708&rft.eissn=1872-9657&rft.coden=AWREDI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.advwatres.2004.08.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17593898%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c398t-c53f36fe6426d3bfcfa72837f3d7154641d26d0780812a9b66c50ef04d45e6fe3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17593898&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |