Looking back on the London Olympics: Independent outcome and hindsight effects in decision evaluation

Outcome bias and hindsight bias are related, but how exactly? To remedy theoretical ambiguity and non‐existent directly relevant empirical research, we contrast an older idea (Baron & Hershey, 1988, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54, 569) that sees outcome bias as partly mediated through hindsight bias...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:British journal of social psychology 2015-12, Vol.54 (4), p.798-807
Main Authors: Blank, Hartmut, Diedenhofen, Birk, Musch, Jochen
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Ambiguity
Bias
decision evaluation
Decision Making
Female
foreseeability
Games
Hindsight bias
Humans
Internet
London Olympics
Male
Mediation
Middle Aged
outcome bias
Sports
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Outcome bias and hindsight bias are related, but how exactly? To remedy theoretical ambiguity and non‐existent directly relevant empirical research, we contrast an older idea (Baron & Hershey, 1988, J. Pers. Soc. Psychol., 54, 569) that sees outcome bias as partly mediated through hindsight bias with the idea that the two biases independently affect decision evaluations. In an Internet study of retrospections on the 2012 London Olympics, evaluations of the Games' success and its foreseeability had independent effects on evaluations of the International Olympic Committee's decision to award the Olympics to London; there was no evidence of mediation. Further theoretical discussion emphasizes the need to distinguish between a holistic assessment of decisions and a more specific assessment of the decision‐making process in future outcome bias research.
ISSN:0144-6665
2044-8309
DOI:10.1111/bjso.12116