The Chinle Dog Shoots: Federal Governance and Grass-roots Politics in Postwar Navajo Country

In the 1950s, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) managed the Navajo Reservation's feral dog population by scheduling semi-annual “dog shoots.” After one gruesome dog shoot resulted in seventeen slaughtered dogs in Chinle, Arizona, community members pressed local BIA authorities to reform reserv...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Pacific historical review 2014-02, Vol.83 (1), p.92-129
Main Author: Johnson, Khalil Anthony
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
American Indian education
Animal rights movement
Authoritarianism
Chinle Arizona
Dogs
Executive committees
Governance
Grass roots movement
Native Americans
Native reservations
Navajo Indian Reservation-Arizona
Petitioners
Police
Political behavior
Politics
Shootings
Towns
Treaty lands
Tribal councils
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In the 1950s, the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) managed the Navajo Reservation's feral dog population by scheduling semi-annual “dog shoots.” After one gruesome dog shoot resulted in seventeen slaughtered dogs in Chinle, Arizona, community members pressed local BIA authorities to reform reservation dog control, an effort that pitted the interethnic community against an authoritarian form of settler-colonial governance. Because citizenship on the reservation—for Navajo and non-Navajo alike—was effectively rendered inferior to that of citizens outside the reservation, substantive changes to local BIA policies required an alliance with a constituency beyond the reservation’s borders, one with full access to state power—in this case, the National Dog Welfare Guild. This article thus demonstrates Native American grass-roots activism and boundary politics against oppressive federal authority.
ISSN:0030-8684
1533-8584
DOI:10.1525/phr.2014.83.1.92