Loading…
On Judicial Review in a Separation of Powers System
The institution of judicial review is an important mechanism of holding the government legally accountable, nevertheless questions remain about its proper role in a separation of powers system. This article analyzes the effect of judicial review on the policy-making process from an expertise perspec...
Saved in:
Published in: | Political science research and methods 2015-09, Vol.3 (3), p.473-492 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | The institution of judicial review is an important mechanism of holding the
government legally accountable, nevertheless questions remain about its
proper role in a separation of powers system. This article analyzes the
effect of judicial review on the policy-making process from an expertise
perspective. It shows that the exercise of non-expert judicial review can
induce more informed policies and that non-expert courts have incentives to
exercise judicial review in a manner consistent with institutional concerns
for expertise. In addition to its importance as a mechanism of legal
accountability, our analysis underscores another virtue of judicial review:
legal review of governmental policy by non-expert courts can improve the
amount of information available for policy making. The article contributes
to a literature on the scope and legitimacy of judicial review and has
broader implications for understanding the effect of institutional checks
and balances on the quality of policy making. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2049-8470 2049-8489 |
DOI: | 10.1017/psrm.2014.44 |