Loading…

Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity

One of the limitations related to the use of bioassays for evaluating acute toxicity in potable waters is the low concentration of toxicants normally present in such waters. Even though low concentrations of some toxicants are occasionally detectable by chronic toxicity tests, it is very difficult t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental toxicology 2000-01, Vol.15 (4), p.345-351
Main Authors: Diaz-Baez, M C, Cruz, LE, Rodriguez, D, Perez, J, Vargas, C M
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 351
container_issue 4
container_start_page 345
container_title Environmental toxicology
container_volume 15
creator Diaz-Baez, M C
Cruz, LE
Rodriguez, D
Perez, J
Vargas, C M
description One of the limitations related to the use of bioassays for evaluating acute toxicity in potable waters is the low concentration of toxicants normally present in such waters. Even though low concentrations of some toxicants are occasionally detectable by chronic toxicity tests, it is very difficult to obtain a response with acute bioassays. As part of the research projects supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) this study was carried out to evaluate simple, inexpensive concentration methods for use in toxicity testing of potable waters. The three concentration methods evaluated in this study were (1) flash evaporation by means of a rotary evaporator operated with a 45 degree C water bath; (2) blue rayon adsorption; and (3) solid phase extraction using reverse-phase disks with octadecylsilica (C sub(18)). Nine solutions with pure chemicals were used to establish the recovery rate by each method. From these experiments, two methods, blue rayon and solid phase extraction were selected to further test environmental samples. Water samples were collected from drinking water treatment plants, rivers, wells, and ponds. The results with pure chemical solutions showed that all extraction/concentration procedures tested were themselves selective. Although flash evaporation showed high recoveries, economical constraints may limit its use. Blue rayon and solid phase extraction may be combined to concentrate different toxicants. Results with the environmental samples for these two last methods indicated that natural water samples which were negative for toxicity showed a toxic response after concentration. Results also suggest that treatment plants may decrease the toxicity of treated effluents but concentration procedures confirmed that toxic effects remain present nonetheless.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/1522-7278(2000)15:4<345::AID-TOX11>3.3.CO;2-F
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17617643</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17617643</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176176433</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjM1KAzEUhbNQsFrf4a5EFxnzM5mpowhSW-qqmy50VUK4pZExGZM7_rx9I_oAwoHD4TvnMGakqKQQ6loapXir2tmlEkJcSdPVd7o2Xffw9Mg362cp73Wlq_n6VvHlEZuUvuC1mMkTdprza9ncNKaZsJfFh-1HSz4GiDugfUKET0uYwMXgMFD6hYRuH_z7iBlsEQzJxwSZcACKhWYC60bCkr688_Q9Zcc722c8__MzdrFcbOYrPqT4c0PbN58d9r0NGMe8lW1TVGv97-IBZZ1RJg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17617643</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Diaz-Baez, M C ; Cruz, LE ; Rodriguez, D ; Perez, J ; Vargas, C M</creator><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Baez, M C ; Cruz, LE ; Rodriguez, D ; Perez, J ; Vargas, C M</creatorcontrib><description>One of the limitations related to the use of bioassays for evaluating acute toxicity in potable waters is the low concentration of toxicants normally present in such waters. Even though low concentrations of some toxicants are occasionally detectable by chronic toxicity tests, it is very difficult to obtain a response with acute bioassays. As part of the research projects supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) this study was carried out to evaluate simple, inexpensive concentration methods for use in toxicity testing of potable waters. The three concentration methods evaluated in this study were (1) flash evaporation by means of a rotary evaporator operated with a 45 degree C water bath; (2) blue rayon adsorption; and (3) solid phase extraction using reverse-phase disks with octadecylsilica (C sub(18)). Nine solutions with pure chemicals were used to establish the recovery rate by each method. From these experiments, two methods, blue rayon and solid phase extraction were selected to further test environmental samples. Water samples were collected from drinking water treatment plants, rivers, wells, and ponds. The results with pure chemical solutions showed that all extraction/concentration procedures tested were themselves selective. Although flash evaporation showed high recoveries, economical constraints may limit its use. Blue rayon and solid phase extraction may be combined to concentrate different toxicants. Results with the environmental samples for these two last methods indicated that natural water samples which were negative for toxicity showed a toxic response after concentration. Results also suggest that treatment plants may decrease the toxicity of treated effluents but concentration procedures confirmed that toxic effects remain present nonetheless.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1520-4081</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/1522-7278(2000)15:4&lt;345::AID-TOX11&gt;3.3.CO;2-F</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Environmental toxicology, 2000-01, Vol.15 (4), p.345-351</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Baez, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C M</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity</title><title>Environmental toxicology</title><description>One of the limitations related to the use of bioassays for evaluating acute toxicity in potable waters is the low concentration of toxicants normally present in such waters. Even though low concentrations of some toxicants are occasionally detectable by chronic toxicity tests, it is very difficult to obtain a response with acute bioassays. As part of the research projects supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) this study was carried out to evaluate simple, inexpensive concentration methods for use in toxicity testing of potable waters. The three concentration methods evaluated in this study were (1) flash evaporation by means of a rotary evaporator operated with a 45 degree C water bath; (2) blue rayon adsorption; and (3) solid phase extraction using reverse-phase disks with octadecylsilica (C sub(18)). Nine solutions with pure chemicals were used to establish the recovery rate by each method. From these experiments, two methods, blue rayon and solid phase extraction were selected to further test environmental samples. Water samples were collected from drinking water treatment plants, rivers, wells, and ponds. The results with pure chemical solutions showed that all extraction/concentration procedures tested were themselves selective. Although flash evaporation showed high recoveries, economical constraints may limit its use. Blue rayon and solid phase extraction may be combined to concentrate different toxicants. Results with the environmental samples for these two last methods indicated that natural water samples which were negative for toxicity showed a toxic response after concentration. Results also suggest that treatment plants may decrease the toxicity of treated effluents but concentration procedures confirmed that toxic effects remain present nonetheless.</description><issn>1520-4081</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNjM1KAzEUhbNQsFrf4a5EFxnzM5mpowhSW-qqmy50VUK4pZExGZM7_rx9I_oAwoHD4TvnMGakqKQQ6loapXir2tmlEkJcSdPVd7o2Xffw9Mg362cp73Wlq_n6VvHlEZuUvuC1mMkTdprza9ncNKaZsJfFh-1HSz4GiDugfUKET0uYwMXgMFD6hYRuH_z7iBlsEQzJxwSZcACKhWYC60bCkr688_Q9Zcc722c8__MzdrFcbOYrPqT4c0PbN58d9r0NGMe8lW1TVGv97-IBZZ1RJg</recordid><startdate>20000101</startdate><enddate>20000101</enddate><creator>Diaz-Baez, M C</creator><creator>Cruz, LE</creator><creator>Rodriguez, D</creator><creator>Perez, J</creator><creator>Vargas, C M</creator><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20000101</creationdate><title>Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity</title><author>Diaz-Baez, M C ; Cruz, LE ; Rodriguez, D ; Perez, J ; Vargas, C M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176176433</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Diaz-Baez, M C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cruz, LE</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodriguez, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Perez, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vargas, C M</creatorcontrib><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Environmental toxicology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Diaz-Baez, M C</au><au>Cruz, LE</au><au>Rodriguez, D</au><au>Perez, J</au><au>Vargas, C M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity</atitle><jtitle>Environmental toxicology</jtitle><date>2000-01-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>345</spage><epage>351</epage><pages>345-351</pages><issn>1520-4081</issn><abstract>One of the limitations related to the use of bioassays for evaluating acute toxicity in potable waters is the low concentration of toxicants normally present in such waters. Even though low concentrations of some toxicants are occasionally detectable by chronic toxicity tests, it is very difficult to obtain a response with acute bioassays. As part of the research projects supported by the International Development Research Centre (IDRC) this study was carried out to evaluate simple, inexpensive concentration methods for use in toxicity testing of potable waters. The three concentration methods evaluated in this study were (1) flash evaporation by means of a rotary evaporator operated with a 45 degree C water bath; (2) blue rayon adsorption; and (3) solid phase extraction using reverse-phase disks with octadecylsilica (C sub(18)). Nine solutions with pure chemicals were used to establish the recovery rate by each method. From these experiments, two methods, blue rayon and solid phase extraction were selected to further test environmental samples. Water samples were collected from drinking water treatment plants, rivers, wells, and ponds. The results with pure chemical solutions showed that all extraction/concentration procedures tested were themselves selective. Although flash evaporation showed high recoveries, economical constraints may limit its use. Blue rayon and solid phase extraction may be combined to concentrate different toxicants. Results with the environmental samples for these two last methods indicated that natural water samples which were negative for toxicity showed a toxic response after concentration. Results also suggest that treatment plants may decrease the toxicity of treated effluents but concentration procedures confirmed that toxic effects remain present nonetheless.</abstract><doi>10.1002/1522-7278(2000)15:4&lt;345::AID-TOX11&gt;3.3.CO;2-F</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1520-4081
ispartof Environmental toxicology, 2000-01, Vol.15 (4), p.345-351
issn 1520-4081
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17617643
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
title Evaluation of three water concentration techniques as a prior step to test acute toxicity
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T19%3A59%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20three%20water%20concentration%20techniques%20as%20a%20prior%20step%20to%20test%20acute%20toxicity&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20toxicology&rft.au=Diaz-Baez,%20M%20C&rft.date=2000-01-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=345&rft.epage=351&rft.pages=345-351&rft.issn=1520-4081&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/1522-7278(2000)15:4%3C345::AID-TOX11%3E3.3.CO;2-F&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E17617643%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176176433%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17617643&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true