Loading…

Al2TiO5–mullite porous ceramics from particle stabilized wet foam

Aluminium titanate (Al2TiO5)–mullite porous ceramics were synthesized by a direct foaming method, using α-Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 as starting materials. The initial suspension for Al2TiO5 was prepared by adding TiO2 suspension to an equimolar amount of partially hydrophobized colloidal Al2O3 suspensio...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ceramics international 2015-06, Vol.41 (5), p.6306-6311
Main Authors: Sarkar, Naboneeta, Park, Jung Gyu, Mazumder, Sangram, Pokhrel, Ashish, Aneziris, Christos G., Kim, Ik Jin
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Aluminium titanate (Al2TiO5)–mullite porous ceramics were synthesized by a direct foaming method, using α-Al2O3, TiO2, and SiO2 as starting materials. The initial suspension for Al2TiO5 was prepared by adding TiO2 suspension to an equimolar amount of partially hydrophobized colloidal Al2O3 suspension. A secondary suspension was prepared using molar composition 3:2 Al2O3/SiO2, and blended to the initial suspension in (0, 10, 20, 30 and 50)vol%, to obtain the mullite phase in the sintered sample. The wet foam exhibits an air content of 80–92% and Laplace pressure from 1.30 to 2.23mPa, which results in 68–83% foam stability. It also exhibits a much higher adsorption free energy of about 2.2×10−13J to 2.7×10−13J at the interface, which results in irreversible adsorption of particles at the air–water interface, leading to outstanding foam stability. The final suspension was foamed, and the wet foam was sintered at 1500°C for 1h. Phase identification was accomplished using X-ray diffraction, and microstructural analysis was performed by field emission scanning electron microscopy.
ISSN:0272-8842
1873-3956
DOI:10.1016/j.ceramint.2015.01.056