Critical assessment of the mandrel peel test for fiber reinforced thermoplastic laminates

► We critically assess the mandrel peel test for thermoplastic composite laminates. ► Two interfaces are considered: a UD–UD and a hybrid, i.e. fabric–UD, interface. ► The peel fracture toughness is compared to values obtained by DCB and ELS tests. ► The experiments on the UD laminate showed good co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Engineering fracture mechanics 2013-03, Vol.101, p.96-108
Main Authors: Grouve, W.J.B., Warnet, L.L., Akkerman, R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Assessments
Cantilever beams
Fracture mechanics
Fracture toughness
Interface fracture
Laminates
Mandrels
Peel tests
Polymer matrix composites
Thermoplastic resins
Toughness testing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:► We critically assess the mandrel peel test for thermoplastic composite laminates. ► Two interfaces are considered: a UD–UD and a hybrid, i.e. fabric–UD, interface. ► The peel fracture toughness is compared to values obtained by DCB and ELS tests. ► The experiments on the UD laminate showed good comparison between the tests. ► The hybrid interface could only be quantified using the mandrel peel test. The applicability of the mandrel peel test for thermoplastic composites was investigated experimentally by comparing the fracture toughness to the values obtained by the double cantilever beam (DCB) and end loaded split (ELS) beam test. Two laminates were considered: a unidirectionally carbon-PPS laminate and a carbon-PPS hybrid laminate, in which the interface consisted of a woven fabric and a unidirectionally reinforced ply. The mandrel peel results on the unidirectionally reinforced laminate compared well with the DCB and ELS test results. The fracture toughness of the hybrid interface could not be quantified by the DCB or ELS test, whereas this was possible using the mandrel peel test.
ISSN:0013-7944
1873-7315
DOI:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2012.07.005