Loading…

Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects

Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailab...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Risk analysis 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339
Main Authors: Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá, Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H., Halman, Johannes I.M., van Tol, Frits A.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3
container_end_page 339
container_issue 2
container_start_page 323
container_title Risk analysis
container_volume 34
creator Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá
Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.
Halman, Johannes I.M.
van Tol, Frits A.
description Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/risa.12094
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762142210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500685887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuBQWupWe9MfIAsiSGE035lcyqLWam3ZKoXehHyclayzM5rsYP33zXZWhV7U5iY3zzknOS9CHwjeJ-UcpJjtPqFY81doRATTldSUv0YjTBWtOGN0A73LeY4xwViot2iDsloKJcUIiS9dgCa21-NpzDfVFBq7hDA-a7v7BsI1jGM7vuzbdjDfUjcHv8xb6M3MNhner-9NdHV8dDn5VJ1_PTmdHJ5XXkjMK8cZBKq98oGDs0Exba134LwW1mvnffDcOc0DUYSx8nQqhaNWE4tFPQtsE-0NfW9Td9dDXppFzB6axrbQ9dkQJSnhlBL8MhWCCk1FWcfLlHOMVcH_QTGWtahrVejOX3Te9akt6zGEa415-d5q9sdB-dTlnGBmblNc2PRgCDarNM0qTfMnzYK31y17t4DwRB_jK2B3DWz2tpkl2_qYn13NCJVSF0cGdx8bePjHSDM9_X74OLwaamJewq-nGptujFRMCfPj4sR8pmcX6qeYGMF-A5zwwyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499041533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.12094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23865765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bayesian belief networks ; Bayesian method ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Constraining ; Construction industry ; Cost analysis ; epistemic uncertainty ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure ; Judgement ; Judgments ; Knowledge ; Mathematical models ; Medical sciences ; Modelling ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; relevant information ; reliability modeling ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; risk modeling ; risk-related knowledge modeling ; Studies ; Tunnels ; Tunnels, galleries ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339</ispartof><rights>2013 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2014 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28312669$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Analysis</addtitle><description>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bayesian belief networks</subject><subject>Bayesian method</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>epistemic uncertainty</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Judgement</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>relevant information</subject><subject>reliability modeling</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>risk modeling</subject><subject>risk-related knowledge modeling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Tunnels, galleries</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuBQWupWe9MfIAsiSGE035lcyqLWam3ZKoXehHyclayzM5rsYP33zXZWhV7U5iY3zzknOS9CHwjeJ-UcpJjtPqFY81doRATTldSUv0YjTBWtOGN0A73LeY4xwViot2iDsloKJcUIiS9dgCa21-NpzDfVFBq7hDA-a7v7BsI1jGM7vuzbdjDfUjcHv8xb6M3MNhner-9NdHV8dDn5VJ1_PTmdHJ5XXkjMK8cZBKq98oGDs0Exba134LwW1mvnffDcOc0DUYSx8nQqhaNWE4tFPQtsE-0NfW9Td9dDXppFzB6axrbQ9dkQJSnhlBL8MhWCCk1FWcfLlHOMVcH_QTGWtahrVejOX3Te9akt6zGEa415-d5q9sdB-dTlnGBmblNc2PRgCDarNM0qTfMnzYK31y17t4DwRB_jK2B3DWz2tpkl2_qYn13NCJVSF0cGdx8bePjHSDM9_X74OLwaamJewq-nGptujFRMCfPj4sR8pmcX6qeYGMF-A5zwwyM</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creator><creator>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creator><creator>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creator><creator>van Tol, Frits A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><author>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bayesian belief networks</topic><topic>Bayesian method</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>epistemic uncertainty</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Judgement</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>relevant information</topic><topic>reliability modeling</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>risk modeling</topic><topic>risk-related knowledge modeling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Tunnels, galleries</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</au><au>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</au><au>Halman, Johannes I.M.</au><au>van Tol, Frits A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Analysis</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>323-339</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23865765</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.12094</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0272-4332
ispartof Risk analysis, 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339
issn 0272-4332
1539-6924
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762142210
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks
subjects Applied sciences
Bayesian belief networks
Bayesian method
Biological and medical sciences
Buildings. Public works
Constraining
Construction industry
Cost analysis
epistemic uncertainty
Exact sciences and technology
Failure
Judgement
Judgments
Knowledge
Mathematical models
Medical sciences
Modelling
Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine
relevant information
reliability modeling
Risk
Risk analysis
Risk assessment
Risk management
risk modeling
risk-related knowledge modeling
Studies
Tunnels
Tunnels, galleries
Uncertainty
title Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20Risk-Related%20Knowledge%20in%20Tunneling%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=C%C3%A1rdenas,%20Ibsen%20Chivat%C3%A1&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=323-339&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.12094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500685887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499041533&rft_id=info:pmid/23865765&rfr_iscdi=true