Loading…
Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects
Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailab...
Saved in:
Published in: | Risk analysis 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3 |
container_end_page | 339 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 323 |
container_title | Risk analysis |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. Halman, Johannes I.M. van Tol, Frits A. |
description | Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/risa.12094 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762142210</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1500685887</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuBQWupWe9MfIAsiSGE035lcyqLWam3ZKoXehHyclayzM5rsYP33zXZWhV7U5iY3zzknOS9CHwjeJ-UcpJjtPqFY81doRATTldSUv0YjTBWtOGN0A73LeY4xwViot2iDsloKJcUIiS9dgCa21-NpzDfVFBq7hDA-a7v7BsI1jGM7vuzbdjDfUjcHv8xb6M3MNhner-9NdHV8dDn5VJ1_PTmdHJ5XXkjMK8cZBKq98oGDs0Exba134LwW1mvnffDcOc0DUYSx8nQqhaNWE4tFPQtsE-0NfW9Td9dDXppFzB6axrbQ9dkQJSnhlBL8MhWCCk1FWcfLlHOMVcH_QTGWtahrVejOX3Te9akt6zGEa415-d5q9sdB-dTlnGBmblNc2PRgCDarNM0qTfMnzYK31y17t4DwRB_jK2B3DWz2tpkl2_qYn13NCJVSF0cGdx8bePjHSDM9_X74OLwaamJewq-nGptujFRMCfPj4sR8pmcX6qeYGMF-A5zwwyM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1499041533</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><source>EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks</source><creator>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><description>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0272-4332</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1539-6924</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/risa.12094</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23865765</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, NJ: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bayesian belief networks ; Bayesian method ; Biological and medical sciences ; Buildings. Public works ; Constraining ; Construction industry ; Cost analysis ; epistemic uncertainty ; Exact sciences and technology ; Failure ; Judgement ; Judgments ; Knowledge ; Mathematical models ; Medical sciences ; Modelling ; Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine ; relevant information ; reliability modeling ; Risk ; Risk analysis ; Risk assessment ; Risk management ; risk modeling ; risk-related knowledge modeling ; Studies ; Tunnels ; Tunnels, galleries ; Uncertainty</subject><ispartof>Risk analysis, 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339</ispartof><rights>2013 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>2013 Society for Risk Analysis.</rights><rights>2014 Society for Risk Analysis</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200,33201</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=28312669$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23865765$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><title>Risk analysis</title><addtitle>Risk Analysis</addtitle><description>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bayesian belief networks</subject><subject>Bayesian method</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Buildings. Public works</subject><subject>Constraining</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Cost analysis</subject><subject>epistemic uncertainty</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Failure</subject><subject>Judgement</subject><subject>Judgments</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</subject><subject>relevant information</subject><subject>reliability modeling</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Risk analysis</subject><subject>Risk assessment</subject><subject>Risk management</subject><subject>risk modeling</subject><subject>risk-related knowledge modeling</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tunnels</subject><subject>Tunnels, galleries</subject><subject>Uncertainty</subject><issn>0272-4332</issn><issn>1539-6924</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqN0V1LHDEUBuBQWupWe9MfIAsiSGE035lcyqLWam3ZKoXehHyclayzM5rsYP33zXZWhV7U5iY3zzknOS9CHwjeJ-UcpJjtPqFY81doRATTldSUv0YjTBWtOGN0A73LeY4xwViot2iDsloKJcUIiS9dgCa21-NpzDfVFBq7hDA-a7v7BsI1jGM7vuzbdjDfUjcHv8xb6M3MNhner-9NdHV8dDn5VJ1_PTmdHJ5XXkjMK8cZBKq98oGDs0Exba134LwW1mvnffDcOc0DUYSx8nQqhaNWE4tFPQtsE-0NfW9Td9dDXppFzB6axrbQ9dkQJSnhlBL8MhWCCk1FWcfLlHOMVcH_QTGWtahrVejOX3Te9akt6zGEa415-d5q9sdB-dTlnGBmblNc2PRgCDarNM0qTfMnzYK31y17t4DwRB_jK2B3DWz2tpkl2_qYn13NCJVSF0cGdx8bePjHSDM9_X74OLwaamJewq-nGptujFRMCfPj4sR8pmcX6qeYGMF-A5zwwyM</recordid><startdate>201402</startdate><enddate>201402</enddate><creator>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creator><creator>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creator><creator>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creator><creator>van Tol, Frits A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201402</creationdate><title>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</title><author>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá ; Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H. ; Halman, Johannes I.M. ; van Tol, Frits A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bayesian belief networks</topic><topic>Bayesian method</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Buildings. Public works</topic><topic>Constraining</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Cost analysis</topic><topic>epistemic uncertainty</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Failure</topic><topic>Judgement</topic><topic>Judgments</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine</topic><topic>relevant information</topic><topic>reliability modeling</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Risk analysis</topic><topic>Risk assessment</topic><topic>Risk management</topic><topic>risk modeling</topic><topic>risk-related knowledge modeling</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tunnels</topic><topic>Tunnels, galleries</topic><topic>Uncertainty</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halman, Johannes I.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tol, Frits A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cárdenas, Ibsen Chivatá</au><au>Al-Jibouri, Saad S.H.</au><au>Halman, Johannes I.M.</au><au>van Tol, Frits A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects</atitle><jtitle>Risk analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Risk Analysis</addtitle><date>2014-02</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>323</spage><epage>339</epage><pages>323-339</pages><issn>0272-4332</issn><eissn>1539-6924</eissn><abstract>Knowledge on failure events and their associated factors, gained from past construction projects, is regarded as potentially extremely useful in risk management. However, a number of circumstances are constraining its wider use. Such knowledge is usually scarce, seldom documented, and even unavailable when it is required. Further, there exists a lack of proven methods to integrate and analyze it in a cost‐effective way. This article addresses possible options to overcome these difficulties. Focusing on limited but critical potential failure events, the article demonstrates how knowledge on a number of important potential failure events in tunnel works can be integrated. The problem of unavailable or incomplete information was addressed by gathering judgments from a group of experts. The elicited expert knowledge consisted of failure scenarios and associated probabilistic information. This information was integrated using Bayesian belief‐networks‐based models that were first customized in order to deal with the expected divergence in judgments caused by epistemic uncertainty of risks. The work described in the article shows that the developed models that integrate risk‐related knowledge provide guidance as to the use of specific remedial measures.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, NJ</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><pmid>23865765</pmid><doi>10.1111/risa.12094</doi><tpages>17</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0272-4332 |
ispartof | Risk analysis, 2014-02, Vol.34 (2), p.323-339 |
issn | 0272-4332 1539-6924 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1762142210 |
source | EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection; EBSCOhost SPORTDiscus - Ebooks |
subjects | Applied sciences Bayesian belief networks Bayesian method Biological and medical sciences Buildings. Public works Constraining Construction industry Cost analysis epistemic uncertainty Exact sciences and technology Failure Judgement Judgments Knowledge Mathematical models Medical sciences Modelling Public health. Hygiene-occupational medicine relevant information reliability modeling Risk Risk analysis Risk assessment Risk management risk modeling risk-related knowledge modeling Studies Tunnels Tunnels, galleries Uncertainty |
title | Modeling Risk-Related Knowledge in Tunneling Projects |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-12T21%3A09%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20Risk-Related%20Knowledge%20in%20Tunneling%20Projects&rft.jtitle=Risk%20analysis&rft.au=C%C3%A1rdenas,%20Ibsen%20Chivat%C3%A1&rft.date=2014-02&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=323&rft.epage=339&rft.pages=323-339&rft.issn=0272-4332&rft.eissn=1539-6924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/risa.12094&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1500685887%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5604-b43ed29c7cd4ebad739aacbebc95ac9bccdc4bb94d17133153265b2a91a058fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1499041533&rft_id=info:pmid/23865765&rfr_iscdi=true |