Comparative evaluation of magnetite–graphene oxide and magnetite-reduced graphene oxide composite for As(III) and As(V) removal

• Published in: Journal of hazardous materials 2016-03, Vol.304, p.196-204
• Main Authors: Yoon, Yeojoon, Park, Won Kyu, Hwang, Tae-Mun, Yoon, Dae Ho, Yang, Woo Seok, Kang, Joon-Wun
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adsorption; Arsenic; Graphene oxide; Magnetite; Reduced graphene oxide
• ISSN: 0304-3894; 1873-3336
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.10.053

[Display omitted] •Fe3O4–graphene based materials were used for arsenic adsorption.•The synthesized Fe3O4 on M-GO was more than that of M-rGO.•M-GO was more effective to adsorb arsenic than M-rGO.•As(III) was more favorably adsorbed than As(V) onto both M-GO and M-rGO.•Energy saving could be achieved via omitting reduction and oxidation processes. Arsenic removal using Fe3O4–graphene oxide composite (M-GO) and Fe3O4-reduced graphene oxide composite (M-rGO) was investigated. The M-GO was more effective to adsorb both As(III) and As(V) than M-rGO, because the more functional groups existing on the M-GO could lead to synthesize more Fe3O4 with M-GO. As(III) was more favorable to be adsorbed than As(V) onto both M-GO and M-rGO. According to the effect of pH on arsenic removal, the electrostatic interaction between the positively charged surface of Fe3O4–graphene based adsorbents and anionic As(V) species was a major factor to adsorb As(V). The adsorption mechanism of As(III), on the other hand, was strongly affected by a surface complexation, rather than electrostatic interactions. Consequently, in terms of the process energy consumption, energy saving could be achieved via omitting the reduction process to fabricate M-rGO from M-GO and the pre-oxidation process to convert As(III) to As(V).