Role of the Cerebellar Flocculus Region in Cancellation of the VOR During Passive Whole Body Rotation

• Published in: Journal of neurophysiology 2000-09, Vol.84 (3), p.1599-1613
• Main Authors: Belton, Timothy, McCrea, Robert A
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Action Potentials - physiology; Animals; Behavior, Animal - drug effects; Behavior, Animal - physiology; Cerebellum - cytology; Cerebellum - drug effects; Cerebellum - physiology; Electrooculography; Fixation, Ocular - physiology; flocculus; GABA Agonists - administration & dosage; Head Movements - physiology; Injections; Macaca mulatta; Microelectrodes; Muscimol - administration & dosage; Neural Inhibition - drug effects; Neural Inhibition - physiology; Photic Stimulation - methods; Posture - physiology; Purkinje Cells - cytology; Purkinje Cells - drug effects; Purkinje Cells - physiology; Pursuit, Smooth - drug effects; Pursuit, Smooth - physiology; Reaction Time - physiology; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - drug effects; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology; Regression Analysis; Restraint, Physical; Rotation; Saimiri; Sensory Thresholds - physiology; Space life sciences
• ISSN: 0022-3077; 1522-1598
• DOI: 10.1152/jn.2000.84.3.1599

Department of Neurobiology, Pharmacology and Physiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637 Belton, Timothy and Robert A. McCrea. Role of the Cerebellar Flocculus Region in Cancellation of the VOR During Passive Whole Body Rotation. J. Neurophysiol. 84: 1599-1613, 2000. A series of studies were carried out to investigate the role of the cerebellar flocculus and ventral paraflocculus in the ability to voluntarily cancel the vestibuloocular reflex (VOR). Squirrel monkeys were trained to pursue moving visual targets and to fixate a head stationary or earth stationary target during passive whole body rotation (WBR). The firing behavior of 187   horizontal eye movement-related Purkinje (Pk) cells in the flocculus region was recorded during smooth pursuit eye movements and during WBR. Half of the Pk cells encountered were eye velocity Pk cells whose firing rates were related to eye movements during smooth pursuit and WBR. Their sensitivity to eye velocity during WBR was reduced when a visual target was not present, and their response to unpredictable steps in WBR was delayed by 80-100 ms, which suggests that eye movement sensitivity depended on visual feedback. They were insensitive to WBR when the VOR was canceled. The other half of the Purkinje cells encountered were sensitive to eye velocity during pursuit and to head velocity during VOR cancellation. They resembled the gaze velocity Pk cells previously described in rhesus monkeys. The head velocity signal tended to be less than half as large as the eye velocity-related signal and was observable at a short ( 40 ms) latency when the head was unpredictably accelerated during ongoing VOR cancellation. Gaze and eye velocity type Pk cells were found to be intermixed throughout the ventral paraflocculus and flocculus. Most gaze velocity Pk cells (76%) were sensitive to ipsilateral eye and head velocity, but nearly half (48%) of the eye velocity Pk cells were sensitive to contralateral eye velocity. Thus the output of flocculus region is modified in two ways during cancellation of the VOR. Signals related to both ipsilateral and contralateral eye velocity are removed, and in approximately half of the cells a relatively weak head velocity signal is added. Unilateral injections of muscimol into the flocculus region had little effect on the gain of the VOR evoked either in the presence or absence of visual targets. However, ocular pursuit velocity and the ability to suppress the VOR by fixating a head stati