Loading…

Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes

We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622‐ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492‐ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes we...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:North American journal of fisheries management 2005-08, Vol.25 (3), p.745-762
Main Authors: Hyatt, Kim D., Mathias, Karin L., McQueen, Donald J., Mercer, Brian, Milligan, Patrick, Rankin, D. Paul
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33
container_end_page 762
container_issue 3
container_start_page 745
container_title North American journal of fisheries management
container_volume 25
creator Hyatt, Kim D.
Mathias, Karin L.
McQueen, Donald J.
Mercer, Brian
Milligan, Patrick
Rankin, D. Paul
description We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622‐ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492‐ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes were different. At Tatsamenie Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (11.3% versus 4.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (5.8% versus 2.5%). We found no relationship between fry survival and stocking date, spawner abundance, or food availability in Tatsamenie Lake, but we did find a significant positive relationship between early‐spring fry length and egg‐to‐fry survival. Also, we found that in net‐pen experiments, larger fry survived better. From this, we concluded that hatchery fry stocked into Tatsamenie Lake may suffer from size‐mediated mortality and that net‐pen supplemental feeding could be used to overcome this problem. However, because eggs used for hatchery production come from the lake, fry stocking can only be justified when hatchery fry survival exceeds wild fry survival. At Tatsamenie Lake, this goal has not yet been attained. At Tahltan Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (1.5% versus 6.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (3.6% versus 12.8%). Hatchery fry release date and food availability both failed to explain these differences in fry and smolt survival at Tahltan Lake. However, there was a strong negative relationship between total female escapement and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival. This supported the results of an earlier investigation, which suggested that Tahltan Lake was spawning‐site limited. We concluded that at Tahltan Lake, hatchery fry stocking increased smolt numbers, is biologically justified, and should be continued.
doi_str_mv 10.1577/M03-230.1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17633163</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17633163</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqUw8A88ITGE2nUcJ2Op-oHUwtAiRstxbGrqxMVOWuXfY1RWplf33qPT6QC4x-gJU8ZGa0SSMYniAgwwTfMkzxi9BAM0ZjShRcquwU0IXwghmtPxAHzOjsJ2ojWugU7DpWjlTvkeHpUPXYAfxlZw4-Re9QpuhK0jNo_2wrtTu4OiiW7njyaGQNPA7cnBZ29aE3Zw6mxXl0bAldircAuutLBB3f3dIXifz7bTZbJ6W7xMJ6tEklgpUViXZZbqSqcsV6QSsSaRBUa4kCVFmVY6PnWWowpVtBKy1DJnqMwlKZBWhAzBwzn34N13p0LLaxOkslY0ynWBY5YRgrNf8PEMSu9C8Erzgze18D3HiP9OyeOUPE7JcWRHZ_ZkrOr_B_nrZL5GLKXkBx9hdeI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17633163</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Hyatt, Kim D. ; Mathias, Karin L. ; McQueen, Donald J. ; Mercer, Brian ; Milligan, Patrick ; Rankin, D. Paul</creator><creatorcontrib>Hyatt, Kim D. ; Mathias, Karin L. ; McQueen, Donald J. ; Mercer, Brian ; Milligan, Patrick ; Rankin, D. Paul</creatorcontrib><description>We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622‐ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492‐ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes were different. At Tatsamenie Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (11.3% versus 4.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (5.8% versus 2.5%). We found no relationship between fry survival and stocking date, spawner abundance, or food availability in Tatsamenie Lake, but we did find a significant positive relationship between early‐spring fry length and egg‐to‐fry survival. Also, we found that in net‐pen experiments, larger fry survived better. From this, we concluded that hatchery fry stocked into Tatsamenie Lake may suffer from size‐mediated mortality and that net‐pen supplemental feeding could be used to overcome this problem. However, because eggs used for hatchery production come from the lake, fry stocking can only be justified when hatchery fry survival exceeds wild fry survival. At Tatsamenie Lake, this goal has not yet been attained. At Tahltan Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (1.5% versus 6.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (3.6% versus 12.8%). Hatchery fry release date and food availability both failed to explain these differences in fry and smolt survival at Tahltan Lake. However, there was a strong negative relationship between total female escapement and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival. This supported the results of an earlier investigation, which suggested that Tahltan Lake was spawning‐site limited. We concluded that at Tahltan Lake, hatchery fry stocking increased smolt numbers, is biologically justified, and should be continued.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0275-5947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1548-8675</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1577/M03-230.1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</publisher><subject>Freshwater</subject><ispartof>North American journal of fisheries management, 2005-08, Vol.25 (3), p.745-762</ispartof><rights>2005 American Fisheries Society</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27915,27916</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hyatt, Kim D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Karin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milligan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, D. Paul</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes</title><title>North American journal of fisheries management</title><description>We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622‐ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492‐ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes were different. At Tatsamenie Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (11.3% versus 4.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (5.8% versus 2.5%). We found no relationship between fry survival and stocking date, spawner abundance, or food availability in Tatsamenie Lake, but we did find a significant positive relationship between early‐spring fry length and egg‐to‐fry survival. Also, we found that in net‐pen experiments, larger fry survived better. From this, we concluded that hatchery fry stocked into Tatsamenie Lake may suffer from size‐mediated mortality and that net‐pen supplemental feeding could be used to overcome this problem. However, because eggs used for hatchery production come from the lake, fry stocking can only be justified when hatchery fry survival exceeds wild fry survival. At Tatsamenie Lake, this goal has not yet been attained. At Tahltan Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (1.5% versus 6.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (3.6% versus 12.8%). Hatchery fry release date and food availability both failed to explain these differences in fry and smolt survival at Tahltan Lake. However, there was a strong negative relationship between total female escapement and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival. This supported the results of an earlier investigation, which suggested that Tahltan Lake was spawning‐site limited. We concluded that at Tahltan Lake, hatchery fry stocking increased smolt numbers, is biologically justified, and should be continued.</description><subject>Freshwater</subject><issn>0275-5947</issn><issn>1548-8675</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kD1PwzAYhC0EEqUw8A88ITGE2nUcJ2Op-oHUwtAiRstxbGrqxMVOWuXfY1RWplf33qPT6QC4x-gJU8ZGa0SSMYniAgwwTfMkzxi9BAM0ZjShRcquwU0IXwghmtPxAHzOjsJ2ojWugU7DpWjlTvkeHpUPXYAfxlZw4-Re9QpuhK0jNo_2wrtTu4OiiW7njyaGQNPA7cnBZ29aE3Zw6mxXl0bAldircAuutLBB3f3dIXifz7bTZbJ6W7xMJ6tEklgpUViXZZbqSqcsV6QSsSaRBUa4kCVFmVY6PnWWowpVtBKy1DJnqMwlKZBWhAzBwzn34N13p0LLaxOkslY0ynWBY5YRgrNf8PEMSu9C8Erzgze18D3HiP9OyeOUPE7JcWRHZ_ZkrOr_B_nrZL5GLKXkBx9hdeI</recordid><startdate>200508</startdate><enddate>200508</enddate><creator>Hyatt, Kim D.</creator><creator>Mathias, Karin L.</creator><creator>McQueen, Donald J.</creator><creator>Mercer, Brian</creator><creator>Milligan, Patrick</creator><creator>Rankin, D. Paul</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>H98</scope><scope>L.G</scope></search><sort><creationdate>200508</creationdate><title>Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes</title><author>Hyatt, Kim D. ; Mathias, Karin L. ; McQueen, Donald J. ; Mercer, Brian ; Milligan, Patrick ; Rankin, D. Paul</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Freshwater</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hyatt, Kim D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mathias, Karin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McQueen, Donald J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Brian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Milligan, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rankin, D. Paul</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Aquaculture Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hyatt, Kim D.</au><au>Mathias, Karin L.</au><au>McQueen, Donald J.</au><au>Mercer, Brian</au><au>Milligan, Patrick</au><au>Rankin, D. Paul</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes</atitle><jtitle>North American journal of fisheries management</jtitle><date>2005-08</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>745</spage><epage>762</epage><pages>745-762</pages><issn>0275-5947</issn><eissn>1548-8675</eissn><abstract>We evaluated the relative success of sockeye salmon hatchery fry stocking in two British Columbia–Alaska transboundary lakes (1,622‐ha Tatsamenie Lake and 492‐ha Tahltan Lake). Fry stocking began in the late 1980s and is still under way. During the study period, survival patterns in the two lakes were different. At Tatsamenie Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (11.3% versus 4.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was higher than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (5.8% versus 2.5%). We found no relationship between fry survival and stocking date, spawner abundance, or food availability in Tatsamenie Lake, but we did find a significant positive relationship between early‐spring fry length and egg‐to‐fry survival. Also, we found that in net‐pen experiments, larger fry survived better. From this, we concluded that hatchery fry stocked into Tatsamenie Lake may suffer from size‐mediated mortality and that net‐pen supplemental feeding could be used to overcome this problem. However, because eggs used for hatchery production come from the lake, fry stocking can only be justified when hatchery fry survival exceeds wild fry survival. At Tatsamenie Lake, this goal has not yet been attained. At Tahltan Lake, wild egg‐to‐fry survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐fry survival (1.5% versus 6.3%) and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival was lower than hatchery egg‐to‐smolt survival (3.6% versus 12.8%). Hatchery fry release date and food availability both failed to explain these differences in fry and smolt survival at Tahltan Lake. However, there was a strong negative relationship between total female escapement and wild egg‐to‐smolt survival. This supported the results of an earlier investigation, which suggested that Tahltan Lake was spawning‐site limited. We concluded that at Tahltan Lake, hatchery fry stocking increased smolt numbers, is biologically justified, and should be continued.</abstract><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</pub><doi>10.1577/M03-230.1</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0275-5947
ispartof North American journal of fisheries management, 2005-08, Vol.25 (3), p.745-762
issn 0275-5947
1548-8675
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17633163
source Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Freshwater
title Evaluation of Hatchery versus Wild Sockeye Salmon Fry Growth and Survival in Two British Columbia Lakes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-15T06%3A17%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20Hatchery%20versus%20Wild%20Sockeye%20Salmon%20Fry%20Growth%20and%20Survival%20in%20Two%20British%20Columbia%20Lakes&rft.jtitle=North%20American%20journal%20of%20fisheries%20management&rft.au=Hyatt,%20Kim%20D.&rft.date=2005-08&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=745&rft.epage=762&rft.pages=745-762&rft.issn=0275-5947&rft.eissn=1548-8675&rft_id=info:doi/10.1577/M03-230.1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E17633163%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3005-e1fbb64fdf478e3da0583c91019cb506fef3daf680d0d5dacbfc870b8c390fe33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17633163&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true