The effects of single versus twice daily short term heat acclimation on heat strain and 3000m running performance in hot, humid conditions

• Published in: Journal of thermal biology 2016-02, Vol.56, p.59-67
• Main Authors: Willmott, A.G.B., Gibson, O.R., Hayes, M., Maxwell, N.S.
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: acclimation; Acclimatization; Athletics; Body Temperature; Body Temperature Regulation; Heart Rate; heat; Heat acclimation; Heat stress; Heat Stress Disorders - prevention & control; Heat-Shock Response; Hot Temperature; Humans; Humidity; Male; males; Military; military personnel; Oxygen Consumption; phenotype; relative humidity; Running - physiology; Running - psychology; Short term heat acclimation; Thermoregulation; Twice daily
• ISSN: 0306-4565; 1879-0992
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2016.01.001

Endurance performances are impaired under conditions of elevated heat stress. Short term heat acclimation (STHA) over 4–6 days can evoke rapid adaptation, which mitigate decrements in performance and alleviate heat strain. This study investigated the efficacy of twice daily heat acclimation (TDHA) compared to single session per day heat acclimation (SDHA) and normothermic training, at inducing heat acclimation phenotype and its impact upon running performance in hot, humid conditions. Twenty one, moderately trained males were matched and assigned to three groups; SDHA (mean±SD) (peak oxygen consumption [V̇O2peak] 45.8±6.1mLkg−1min−1, body mass 81.3±16.0kg, stature 182±3cm), TDHA (46.1±7.0mLkg−1min−1, 80.1±11.9kg, 178±4cm) or control (CON) (47.1±3.5mLkg−1min−1, 78.6±16.7kg, 178±4cm). Interventions consisted of 45min cycling at 50% V̇O2peak, once daily for 4d (SDHA) and twice daily for 2d (TDHA), in 35°C, 60% relative humidity (RH), and once daily for 4 days (CON) in 21°C, 40% RH. Participants completed a pre- and post-intervention 5km treadmill run trial in 30°C, 60% RH, where the first 2km were fixed at 40% V̇O2peak and the final 3km was self-paced. No statistically significant interaction effects occurred within- or between-groups over the 2–4 days intervention. While within-group differences were found in physiological and perceptual measures during the fixed intensity trial post-intervention, they did not statistically differ between-groups. Similarly, TDHA (−36±34s [+3.5%]) and SDHA (−26±28s [+2.8%]) groups improved 3km performances (p=0.35), but did not differ from CON (−6±44s [+0.6%]). This is the first study to investigate the effects of HA twice daily and compare it with traditional single session per day STHA. These STHA protocols may have the ability to induce partial adaptive responses to heat stress and possibly enhance performance in environmentally challenging conditions, however, future development is warranted to optimise the administration to provide a potent stimuli for heat adaptation in athletic and military personnel within a rapid regime. •The study compared once versus twice daily heat exposures as well as a control group.•3000 m running performance were improved in once and twice daily groups, but not control.•Partial adaptations were reported post-heat acclimation protocols, but not control.•Twice daily heat acclimation may enable individuals to acclimate within 2–4 days.•Further research is warranted to refine twice daily heat acc