Loading…
Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories
Highlights • A CT pencil-type chamber was calibrated at eight dosimetry laboratories. • Three different calibration methods were assessed and compared. • The “ partial irradiation method ” is the preferred calibration method. • Most laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) with the st...
Saved in:
| Published in: | Physica medica 2016-01, Vol.32 (1), p.42-51 |
|---|---|
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Subjects: | |
| Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
| Online Access: | Get full text |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403 |
|---|---|
| cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403 |
| container_end_page | 51 |
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 42 |
| container_title | Physica medica |
| container_volume | 32 |
| creator | Hourdakis, Costas J Büermann, Ludwig Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera Csete, Istvan Delis, Harry Gomola, Igor Persson, Linda Novak, Leos Petkov, Ivailo Toroi, Paula |
| description | Highlights • A CT pencil-type chamber was calibrated at eight dosimetry laboratories. • Three different calibration methods were assessed and compared. • The “ partial irradiation method ” is the preferred calibration method. • Most laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) with the standards. • Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been performed. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008 |
| format | article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764342384</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S1120179715009084</els_id><sourcerecordid>1764342384</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2L1jAUhYMozjj6B1xIlm5ac9O0aUEEefELBlzMCO5CPm6ZdNqmJu3IO79-Ut7RhQtX93I558B9DiGvgZXAoHk3lDhMS8kZ1CXrSsbaJ-QcJBcFdPDzad6BswJkJ8_Ii5QGxirO6_o5OeNNzVoG1Tm5PYRp0dGnMNPQ0wVn68diPS5IfZj9vV7zoPZGTwYjtXr0Jp5uEdM2ronq2dEJ15vgEjW4_kacqQvJ51s80lGbkA0hekwvybNejwlfPc4L8uPzp-vD1-Ly-5dvh4-XhRUAayGkE5XWqKFvAaVD0blKcEDtoOUgq7o3wmCPjTOdBimzi5um6dDpHgWrLsjbU-4Sw68N06omnyyOo54xbEmBbEQOrFqRpfwktTGkFLFXS_STjkcFTO2Q1aB2yGqHrFinMuRsevOYv5kJ3V_LH6pZ8P4kwPzlnceokvWZLDof0a7KBf___A__2O3oZ5_h3-IR0xC2OGd-ClTiiqmrvea9ZagZ61j-6gHP16Wv</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764342384</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Hourdakis, Costas J ; Büermann, Ludwig ; Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera ; Csete, Istvan ; Delis, Harry ; Gomola, Igor ; Persson, Linda ; Novak, Leos ; Petkov, Ivailo ; Toroi, Paula</creator><creatorcontrib>Hourdakis, Costas J ; Büermann, Ludwig ; Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera ; Csete, Istvan ; Delis, Harry ; Gomola, Igor ; Persson, Linda ; Novak, Leos ; Petkov, Ivailo ; Toroi, Paula</creatorcontrib><description>Highlights • A CT pencil-type chamber was calibrated at eight dosimetry laboratories. • Three different calibration methods were assessed and compared. • The “ partial irradiation method ” is the preferred calibration method. • Most laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) with the standards. • Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been performed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1120-1797</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1724-191X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26508013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Italy: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Air ; Air kerma length product ; Calibration ; Comparison ; CT dosimetry ; CT pencil type ionization chambers ; Europe ; International Cooperation ; Ions ; Laboratories - standards ; Models, Statistical ; Observer Variation ; Radiation Dosage ; Radiology ; Radiometry - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><ispartof>Physica medica, 2016-01, Vol.32 (1), p.42-51</ispartof><rights>Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica</rights><rights>2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-9168-1822 ; 0000-0003-0989-0356</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26508013$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hourdakis, Costas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büermann, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csete, Istvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delis, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomola, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Leos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petkov, Ivailo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroi, Paula</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories</title><title>Physica medica</title><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><description>Highlights • A CT pencil-type chamber was calibrated at eight dosimetry laboratories. • Three different calibration methods were assessed and compared. • The “ partial irradiation method ” is the preferred calibration method. • Most laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) with the standards. • Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been performed.</description><subject>Air</subject><subject>Air kerma length product</subject><subject>Calibration</subject><subject>Comparison</subject><subject>CT dosimetry</subject><subject>CT pencil type ionization chambers</subject><subject>Europe</subject><subject>International Cooperation</subject><subject>Ions</subject><subject>Laboratories - standards</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Observer Variation</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</subject><issn>1120-1797</issn><issn>1724-191X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kU2L1jAUhYMozjj6B1xIlm5ac9O0aUEEefELBlzMCO5CPm6ZdNqmJu3IO79-Ut7RhQtX93I558B9DiGvgZXAoHk3lDhMS8kZ1CXrSsbaJ-QcJBcFdPDzad6BswJkJ8_Ii5QGxirO6_o5OeNNzVoG1Tm5PYRp0dGnMNPQ0wVn68diPS5IfZj9vV7zoPZGTwYjtXr0Jp5uEdM2ronq2dEJ15vgEjW4_kacqQvJ51s80lGbkA0hekwvybNejwlfPc4L8uPzp-vD1-Ly-5dvh4-XhRUAayGkE5XWqKFvAaVD0blKcEDtoOUgq7o3wmCPjTOdBimzi5um6dDpHgWrLsjbU-4Sw68N06omnyyOo54xbEmBbEQOrFqRpfwktTGkFLFXS_STjkcFTO2Q1aB2yGqHrFinMuRsevOYv5kJ3V_LH6pZ8P4kwPzlnceokvWZLDof0a7KBf___A__2O3oZ5_h3-IR0xC2OGd-ClTiiqmrvea9ZagZ61j-6gHP16Wv</recordid><startdate>20160101</startdate><enddate>20160101</enddate><creator>Hourdakis, Costas J</creator><creator>Büermann, Ludwig</creator><creator>Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera</creator><creator>Csete, Istvan</creator><creator>Delis, Harry</creator><creator>Gomola, Igor</creator><creator>Persson, Linda</creator><creator>Novak, Leos</creator><creator>Petkov, Ivailo</creator><creator>Toroi, Paula</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9168-1822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-0356</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20160101</creationdate><title>Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories</title><author>Hourdakis, Costas J ; Büermann, Ludwig ; Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera ; Csete, Istvan ; Delis, Harry ; Gomola, Igor ; Persson, Linda ; Novak, Leos ; Petkov, Ivailo ; Toroi, Paula</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air</topic><topic>Air kerma length product</topic><topic>Calibration</topic><topic>Comparison</topic><topic>CT dosimetry</topic><topic>CT pencil type ionization chambers</topic><topic>Europe</topic><topic>International Cooperation</topic><topic>Ions</topic><topic>Laboratories - standards</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Observer Variation</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hourdakis, Costas J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Büermann, Ludwig</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Csete, Istvan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Delis, Harry</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomola, Igor</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Persson, Linda</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Novak, Leos</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Petkov, Ivailo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Toroi, Paula</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hourdakis, Costas J</au><au>Büermann, Ludwig</au><au>Ciraj-Bjelac, Olivera</au><au>Csete, Istvan</au><au>Delis, Harry</au><au>Gomola, Igor</au><au>Persson, Linda</au><au>Novak, Leos</au><au>Petkov, Ivailo</au><au>Toroi, Paula</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories</atitle><jtitle>Physica medica</jtitle><addtitle>Phys Med</addtitle><date>2016-01-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>42</spage><epage>51</epage><pages>42-51</pages><issn>1120-1797</issn><eissn>1724-191X</eissn><abstract>Highlights • A CT pencil-type chamber was calibrated at eight dosimetry laboratories. • Three different calibration methods were assessed and compared. • The “ partial irradiation method ” is the preferred calibration method. • Most laboratories achieved high level of agreement (>99%) with the standards. • Detailed analysis of the assigned uncertainties have been performed.</abstract><cop>Italy</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26508013</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9168-1822</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0989-0356</orcidid></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 1120-1797 |
| ispartof | Physica medica, 2016-01, Vol.32 (1), p.42-51 |
| issn | 1120-1797 1724-191X |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1764342384 |
| source | Elsevier |
| subjects | Air Air kerma length product Calibration Comparison CT dosimetry CT pencil type ionization chambers Europe International Cooperation Ions Laboratories - standards Models, Statistical Observer Variation Radiation Dosage Radiology Radiometry - methods Reproducibility of Results Tomography, X-Ray Computed - methods |
| title | Comparison of pencil-type ionization chamber calibration results and methods between dosimetry laboratories |
| url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T18%3A40%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20pencil-type%20ionization%20chamber%20calibration%20results%20and%20methods%20between%20dosimetry%20laboratories&rft.jtitle=Physica%20medica&rft.au=Hourdakis,%20Costas%20J&rft.date=2016-01-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=42&rft.epage=51&rft.pages=42-51&rft.issn=1120-1797&rft.eissn=1724-191X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ejmp.2015.09.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1764342384%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c411t-47d43aaea1f81e7de49d3421ead1821735fb4befe6db9a1774112b669edafe403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764342384&rft_id=info:pmid/26508013&rfr_iscdi=true |