Loading…

Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States

Complications of therapy with CroFab and Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP) include recurrent venom effects and acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs). Reports on their incidences vary widely, due to limited samples and methodological differences. This study was undertaken to identify rates of r...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.) Pa.), 2005-10, Vol.43 (6), p.708-708
Main Authors: Stanford, C F, Olsen, D, Bogdan, G M, Dart, R C
Format: Article
Language:English
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 708
container_issue 6
container_start_page 708
container_title Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)
container_volume 43
creator Stanford, C F
Olsen, D
Bogdan, G M
Dart, R C
description Complications of therapy with CroFab and Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP) include recurrent venom effects and acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs). Reports on their incidences vary widely, due to limited samples and methodological differences. This study was undertaken to identify rates of recurrence (REC) and AHRs using treatment records from multiple poison centers (PC). Treatment and outcome data were systematically abstracted from PC cases involving Crotaline AV therapy in human patients during 2004. Initial control (IC) was defined as a trend toward normalization of all local and systemic venom effects. REC was defined as re-emergence of either swelling (SREC) or coagulopathy (CREC: PLT24 hrs post-AV were considered for REC. Of 344 cases of Crotaline envenomation from 24 states, 243 (71%) patients were treated with AV. Over 90% (222) were given CroFab, 4% (9) received ACP, and 5% (12) received both AVs or unreported AV. IC was achieved in 83% of patients, after a median of one dose of CroFab or ACP. Rate of AHRs was significantly greater for ACP (33%) than for CroFab (7%, p = .03). All AHRs responded to antihistamines and steroids. A total of 99 records qualified for REC. Despite 2 REC after ACP, there were insufficient data in this preliminary analysis to calculate REC rate for ACP (n = 4). REC rate for CroFab was 22% (21/95): SREC was present in 14 of these patients and CREC in 9. One SREC/CREC was accompanied by abnormal bleeding. Median REC onset was 72 hours after IC. Of all cases, one patient developed persistent dysfunction (hemodialysis, no REC). IC of venom effects was often achieved with only one dose of AV. AHRs were more common with ACP than with CroFab. REC was observed with both AVs. REC after CroFab was less common than in pre marketing trials (27-50%), more common than in other post-marketing studies (8-19%), and often with earlier onset (with or without maintenance doses). Medical risk associated with REC remains questionable.
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17655128</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17655128</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176551283</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNyj0KwkAQQOEtFIw_d5jKLpA1boylBMVerWWIE1zZzMbMRPD2IngAq_cVb2QS61yR5oXLJmYq8siyvFxvbWJ2VWy74GtUH1kgNlD3UTF4JkBW_yKOLeideuze4PlLuLBXusFJUUnmZtxgEFr8OjPLw_5cHdOuj8-BRK-tl5pCQKY4yNVuCufsqsz_Hj_ZXDx8</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>17655128</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States</title><source>Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)</source><creator>Stanford, C F ; Olsen, D ; Bogdan, G M ; Dart, R C</creator><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F ; Olsen, D ; Bogdan, G M ; Dart, R C</creatorcontrib><description>Complications of therapy with CroFab and Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP) include recurrent venom effects and acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs). Reports on their incidences vary widely, due to limited samples and methodological differences. This study was undertaken to identify rates of recurrence (REC) and AHRs using treatment records from multiple poison centers (PC). Treatment and outcome data were systematically abstracted from PC cases involving Crotaline AV therapy in human patients during 2004. Initial control (IC) was defined as a trend toward normalization of all local and systemic venom effects. REC was defined as re-emergence of either swelling (SREC) or coagulopathy (CREC: PLT&lt;150, FIB&lt;150, or INR&gt;1.2) after IC. IC, REC, and AHRs rates were compared between AV type (CroFab, ACP). Only cases following the patient for &gt;24 hrs post-AV were considered for REC. Of 344 cases of Crotaline envenomation from 24 states, 243 (71%) patients were treated with AV. Over 90% (222) were given CroFab, 4% (9) received ACP, and 5% (12) received both AVs or unreported AV. IC was achieved in 83% of patients, after a median of one dose of CroFab or ACP. Rate of AHRs was significantly greater for ACP (33%) than for CroFab (7%, p = .03). All AHRs responded to antihistamines and steroids. A total of 99 records qualified for REC. Despite 2 REC after ACP, there were insufficient data in this preliminary analysis to calculate REC rate for ACP (n = 4). REC rate for CroFab was 22% (21/95): SREC was present in 14 of these patients and CREC in 9. One SREC/CREC was accompanied by abnormal bleeding. Median REC onset was &lt;12 hours after IC; only two RECs (one SREC and one CREC) emerged &gt;72 hours after IC. Of all cases, one patient developed persistent dysfunction (hemodialysis, no REC). IC of venom effects was often achieved with only one dose of AV. AHRs were more common with ACP than with CroFab. REC was observed with both AVs. REC after CroFab was less common than in pre marketing trials (27-50%), more common than in other post-marketing studies (8-19%), and often with earlier onset (with or without maintenance doses). Medical risk associated with REC remains questionable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1556-3650</identifier><language>eng</language><ispartof>Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2005-10, Vol.43 (6), p.708-708</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdan, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dart, R C</creatorcontrib><title>Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States</title><title>Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)</title><description>Complications of therapy with CroFab and Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP) include recurrent venom effects and acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs). Reports on their incidences vary widely, due to limited samples and methodological differences. This study was undertaken to identify rates of recurrence (REC) and AHRs using treatment records from multiple poison centers (PC). Treatment and outcome data were systematically abstracted from PC cases involving Crotaline AV therapy in human patients during 2004. Initial control (IC) was defined as a trend toward normalization of all local and systemic venom effects. REC was defined as re-emergence of either swelling (SREC) or coagulopathy (CREC: PLT&lt;150, FIB&lt;150, or INR&gt;1.2) after IC. IC, REC, and AHRs rates were compared between AV type (CroFab, ACP). Only cases following the patient for &gt;24 hrs post-AV were considered for REC. Of 344 cases of Crotaline envenomation from 24 states, 243 (71%) patients were treated with AV. Over 90% (222) were given CroFab, 4% (9) received ACP, and 5% (12) received both AVs or unreported AV. IC was achieved in 83% of patients, after a median of one dose of CroFab or ACP. Rate of AHRs was significantly greater for ACP (33%) than for CroFab (7%, p = .03). All AHRs responded to antihistamines and steroids. A total of 99 records qualified for REC. Despite 2 REC after ACP, there were insufficient data in this preliminary analysis to calculate REC rate for ACP (n = 4). REC rate for CroFab was 22% (21/95): SREC was present in 14 of these patients and CREC in 9. One SREC/CREC was accompanied by abnormal bleeding. Median REC onset was &lt;12 hours after IC; only two RECs (one SREC and one CREC) emerged &gt;72 hours after IC. Of all cases, one patient developed persistent dysfunction (hemodialysis, no REC). IC of venom effects was often achieved with only one dose of AV. AHRs were more common with ACP than with CroFab. REC was observed with both AVs. REC after CroFab was less common than in pre marketing trials (27-50%), more common than in other post-marketing studies (8-19%), and often with earlier onset (with or without maintenance doses). Medical risk associated with REC remains questionable.</description><issn>1556-3650</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNyj0KwkAQQOEtFIw_d5jKLpA1boylBMVerWWIE1zZzMbMRPD2IngAq_cVb2QS61yR5oXLJmYq8siyvFxvbWJ2VWy74GtUH1kgNlD3UTF4JkBW_yKOLeideuze4PlLuLBXusFJUUnmZtxgEFr8OjPLw_5cHdOuj8-BRK-tl5pCQKY4yNVuCufsqsz_Hj_ZXDx8</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Stanford, C F</creator><creator>Olsen, D</creator><creator>Bogdan, G M</creator><creator>Dart, R C</creator><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States</title><author>Stanford, C F ; Olsen, D ; Bogdan, G M ; Dart, R C</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176551283</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Stanford, C F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Olsen, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bogdan, G M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dart, R C</creatorcontrib><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Stanford, C F</au><au>Olsen, D</au><au>Bogdan, G M</au><au>Dart, R C</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States</atitle><jtitle>Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>43</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>708</spage><epage>708</epage><pages>708-708</pages><issn>1556-3650</issn><abstract>Complications of therapy with CroFab and Antivenin Crotalidae Polyvalent (ACP) include recurrent venom effects and acute hypersensitivity reactions (AHRs). Reports on their incidences vary widely, due to limited samples and methodological differences. This study was undertaken to identify rates of recurrence (REC) and AHRs using treatment records from multiple poison centers (PC). Treatment and outcome data were systematically abstracted from PC cases involving Crotaline AV therapy in human patients during 2004. Initial control (IC) was defined as a trend toward normalization of all local and systemic venom effects. REC was defined as re-emergence of either swelling (SREC) or coagulopathy (CREC: PLT&lt;150, FIB&lt;150, or INR&gt;1.2) after IC. IC, REC, and AHRs rates were compared between AV type (CroFab, ACP). Only cases following the patient for &gt;24 hrs post-AV were considered for REC. Of 344 cases of Crotaline envenomation from 24 states, 243 (71%) patients were treated with AV. Over 90% (222) were given CroFab, 4% (9) received ACP, and 5% (12) received both AVs or unreported AV. IC was achieved in 83% of patients, after a median of one dose of CroFab or ACP. Rate of AHRs was significantly greater for ACP (33%) than for CroFab (7%, p = .03). All AHRs responded to antihistamines and steroids. A total of 99 records qualified for REC. Despite 2 REC after ACP, there were insufficient data in this preliminary analysis to calculate REC rate for ACP (n = 4). REC rate for CroFab was 22% (21/95): SREC was present in 14 of these patients and CREC in 9. One SREC/CREC was accompanied by abnormal bleeding. Median REC onset was &lt;12 hours after IC; only two RECs (one SREC and one CREC) emerged &gt;72 hours after IC. Of all cases, one patient developed persistent dysfunction (hemodialysis, no REC). IC of venom effects was often achieved with only one dose of AV. AHRs were more common with ACP than with CroFab. REC was observed with both AVs. REC after CroFab was less common than in pre marketing trials (27-50%), more common than in other post-marketing studies (8-19%), and often with earlier onset (with or without maintenance doses). Medical risk associated with REC remains questionable.</abstract></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1556-3650
ispartof Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.), 2005-10, Vol.43 (6), p.708-708
issn 1556-3650
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17655128
source Taylor and Francis:Jisc Collections:Taylor and Francis Read and Publish Agreement 2024-2025:Medical Collection (Reading list)
title Complications of crotaline antivenom therapy in the United States
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T13%3A37%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Complications%20of%20crotaline%20antivenom%20therapy%20in%20the%20United%20States&rft.jtitle=Clinical%20toxicology%20(Philadelphia,%20Pa.)&rft.au=Stanford,%20C%20F&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=43&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=708&rft.epage=708&rft.pages=708-708&rft.issn=1556-3650&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E17655128%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_miscellaneous_176551283%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=17655128&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true