Loading…

Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective

•Transaction cost theory explains the financial unsustainability CRCs.•Government funding distorts the ability of CRCs to foster continued collaboration.•Current CRC governance is counterproductive to achieving ongoing collaborations. Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs) in Australia are underpinned...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Research policy 2016-02, Vol.45 (1), p.195-204
Main Authors: Sinnewe, Elisabeth, Charles, Michael B., Keast, Robyn
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3
container_end_page 204
container_issue 1
container_start_page 195
container_title Research policy
container_volume 45
creator Sinnewe, Elisabeth
Charles, Michael B.
Keast, Robyn
description •Transaction cost theory explains the financial unsustainability CRCs.•Government funding distorts the ability of CRCs to foster continued collaboration.•Current CRC governance is counterproductive to achieving ongoing collaborations. Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs) in Australia are underpinned by funding from the Australian Government. Among their many goals, they are intended to lead to long-term sustainable relationships between industry and academic institutions without the need for further public funding. Yet concerns have been raised in various reports and reviews about the ability of CRCs to achieve sustainable collaboration beyond their initial seven-year life, despite the general observation that CRCs have proved beneficial to the broader Australian community and the economy in general. This study adduces Transaction Cost Theory to determine the impediments to long-term sustainable collaboration between industry and academia. It does so by examining relationships between CRC members at a member organisational level, rather than at an individual researcher or program level, as previous studies have done. The article concludes by introducing testable governance attributes that have the potential to minimise transaction costs between participants in industry-academic collaboration and therefore foster long-term research collaborations.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.005
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601094</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048733315001432</els_id><sourcerecordid>3898776261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWD_-gYeAB73sOkk2ydaDUIpfUFBEvYaQndWU7WZNtkL_vSn15MHTXN4bZh4hZwxKBkxdLcuIaQhdyYHJEqYlgNwjE1ZrUWjF5T6ZAFR1oYUQh-QopSUAsAqmE_I-W6cx2s7bi0TnIQwY7ei_kb5gQhvdJ51jP0akzzF8RLu6pjOa-T5ZN_rQUxfSSMdPDHFDs5sGdFv9hBy0tkt4-juPydvd7ev8oVg83T_OZ4vCVVqPhQPOleO8qRQDy6VrW8GqBlAoYUG0VrYca6tqDXXLQfO6cYBNxRqmnWqtOCaXu71DDF9rTKNZ-eSw62yPYZ0M00oqYDCtMnr-B12GdezzdZmSuZgUkmWq2lEuhpQitmaIfmXjxjAw29hmaXaxzTa2ganJatZudhrmZ789RpOcx95h42MuYprg_1_wA7zsifE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1750055351</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Sinnewe, Elisabeth ; Charles, Michael B. ; Keast, Robyn</creator><creatorcontrib>Sinnewe, Elisabeth ; Charles, Michael B. ; Keast, Robyn</creatorcontrib><description>•Transaction cost theory explains the financial unsustainability CRCs.•Government funding distorts the ability of CRCs to foster continued collaboration.•Current CRC governance is counterproductive to achieving ongoing collaborations. Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs) in Australia are underpinned by funding from the Australian Government. Among their many goals, they are intended to lead to long-term sustainable relationships between industry and academic institutions without the need for further public funding. Yet concerns have been raised in various reports and reviews about the ability of CRCs to achieve sustainable collaboration beyond their initial seven-year life, despite the general observation that CRCs have proved beneficial to the broader Australian community and the economy in general. This study adduces Transaction Cost Theory to determine the impediments to long-term sustainable collaboration between industry and academia. It does so by examining relationships between CRC members at a member organisational level, rather than at an individual researcher or program level, as previous studies have done. The article concludes by introducing testable governance attributes that have the potential to minimise transaction costs between participants in industry-academic collaboration and therefore foster long-term research collaborations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-7333</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7625</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.005</identifier><identifier>CODEN: REPYBP</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Australia ; Collaboration ; Collaborative research ; Cooperative Research Centres ; Federal funding ; Research centers ; Studies ; Sustainability ; Transaction cost theory ; Transaction costs</subject><ispartof>Research policy, 2016-02, Vol.45 (1), p.195-204</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Sequoia S.A. Feb 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223,33224</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sinnewe, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Robyn</creatorcontrib><title>Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective</title><title>Research policy</title><description>•Transaction cost theory explains the financial unsustainability CRCs.•Government funding distorts the ability of CRCs to foster continued collaboration.•Current CRC governance is counterproductive to achieving ongoing collaborations. Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs) in Australia are underpinned by funding from the Australian Government. Among their many goals, they are intended to lead to long-term sustainable relationships between industry and academic institutions without the need for further public funding. Yet concerns have been raised in various reports and reviews about the ability of CRCs to achieve sustainable collaboration beyond their initial seven-year life, despite the general observation that CRCs have proved beneficial to the broader Australian community and the economy in general. This study adduces Transaction Cost Theory to determine the impediments to long-term sustainable collaboration between industry and academia. It does so by examining relationships between CRC members at a member organisational level, rather than at an individual researcher or program level, as previous studies have done. The article concludes by introducing testable governance attributes that have the potential to minimise transaction costs between participants in industry-academic collaboration and therefore foster long-term research collaborations.</description><subject>Australia</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Collaborative research</subject><subject>Cooperative Research Centres</subject><subject>Federal funding</subject><subject>Research centers</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Transaction cost theory</subject><subject>Transaction costs</subject><issn>0048-7333</issn><issn>1873-7625</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQQIMoWD_-gYeAB73sOkk2ydaDUIpfUFBEvYaQndWU7WZNtkL_vSn15MHTXN4bZh4hZwxKBkxdLcuIaQhdyYHJEqYlgNwjE1ZrUWjF5T6ZAFR1oYUQh-QopSUAsAqmE_I-W6cx2s7bi0TnIQwY7ei_kb5gQhvdJ51jP0akzzF8RLu6pjOa-T5ZN_rQUxfSSMdPDHFDs5sGdFv9hBy0tkt4-juPydvd7ev8oVg83T_OZ4vCVVqPhQPOleO8qRQDy6VrW8GqBlAoYUG0VrYca6tqDXXLQfO6cYBNxRqmnWqtOCaXu71DDF9rTKNZ-eSw62yPYZ0M00oqYDCtMnr-B12GdezzdZmSuZgUkmWq2lEuhpQitmaIfmXjxjAw29hmaXaxzTa2ganJatZudhrmZ789RpOcx95h42MuYprg_1_wA7zsifE</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Sinnewe, Elisabeth</creator><creator>Charles, Michael B.</creator><creator>Keast, Robyn</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier Sequoia S.A</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>JQ2</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective</title><author>Sinnewe, Elisabeth ; Charles, Michael B. ; Keast, Robyn</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Australia</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Collaborative research</topic><topic>Cooperative Research Centres</topic><topic>Federal funding</topic><topic>Research centers</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Transaction cost theory</topic><topic>Transaction costs</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sinnewe, Elisabeth</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Charles, Michael B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Robyn</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sinnewe, Elisabeth</au><au>Charles, Michael B.</au><au>Keast, Robyn</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective</atitle><jtitle>Research policy</jtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>195</spage><epage>204</epage><pages>195-204</pages><issn>0048-7333</issn><eissn>1873-7625</eissn><coden>REPYBP</coden><abstract>•Transaction cost theory explains the financial unsustainability CRCs.•Government funding distorts the ability of CRCs to foster continued collaboration.•Current CRC governance is counterproductive to achieving ongoing collaborations. Cooperative Research Centres (CRCs) in Australia are underpinned by funding from the Australian Government. Among their many goals, they are intended to lead to long-term sustainable relationships between industry and academic institutions without the need for further public funding. Yet concerns have been raised in various reports and reviews about the ability of CRCs to achieve sustainable collaboration beyond their initial seven-year life, despite the general observation that CRCs have proved beneficial to the broader Australian community and the economy in general. This study adduces Transaction Cost Theory to determine the impediments to long-term sustainable collaboration between industry and academia. It does so by examining relationships between CRC members at a member organisational level, rather than at an individual researcher or program level, as previous studies have done. The article concludes by introducing testable governance attributes that have the potential to minimise transaction costs between participants in industry-academic collaboration and therefore foster long-term research collaborations.</abstract><cop>Amsterdam</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.005</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0048-7333
ispartof Research policy, 2016-02, Vol.45 (1), p.195-204
issn 0048-7333
1873-7625
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765601094
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Elsevier
subjects Australia
Collaboration
Collaborative research
Cooperative Research Centres
Federal funding
Research centers
Studies
Sustainability
Transaction cost theory
Transaction costs
title Australia's Cooperative Research Centre Program: A transaction cost theory perspective
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T00%3A45%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Australia's%20Cooperative%20Research%20Centre%20Program:%20A%20transaction%20cost%20theory%20perspective&rft.jtitle=Research%20policy&rft.au=Sinnewe,%20Elisabeth&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=195&rft.epage=204&rft.pages=195-204&rft.issn=0048-7333&rft.eissn=1873-7625&rft.coden=REPYBP&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.respol.2015.09.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3898776261%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c477t-c0226c22d4610a25cff314d0e363a03fa5f2e8a68708f20728dc0ed41d17c6fa3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1750055351&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true