Quantification of Physical Activity and Sedentary Time in Adults with Cerebral Palsy

• Published in: Medicine and science in sports and exercise 2015-08, Vol.47 (8), p.1719-1726
• Main Authors: CLARIDGE, EVERETT A, MCPHEE, PATRICK G, TIMMONS, BRIAN W, MARTIN GINIS, KATHLEEN A, MACDONALD, MAUREEN J, GORTER, JAN WILLEM
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Actigraphy - instrumentation; Adult; Cerebral Palsy; Disabled Persons; Female; Humans; Male; Motor Activity; Sedentary Lifestyle; Time Factors; Young Adult
• ISSN: 0195-9131; 1530-0315
• DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000589

PURPOSEThe purpose of this study was to determine objective and subjective quantification of habitual physical activity (HPA) and sedentary time in ambulatory and nonambulatory adults with cerebral palsy (CP). METHODSWe recruited a clinical sample of adults with CP (N = 42; 21 women; mean (SD) age, 33.5 (12.3) yr; Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) distributionlevel I (n = 5), level II (n = 9), level III (n = 10), level IV (n = 11), and level V (n = 7). Objective measures of HPA and sedentary time were obtained by using ActiGraph GT3X accelerometers at both hip and wrist sites. Three previously established cut-point values distinguishing light physical activity (LPA) and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) were evaluated across GMFCS levels. The concurrent validity of the self-report Physical Activity Recall Assessment for People with Spinal Cord Injury (PARA-SCI) was assessed for LPA and MVPA intensities in GMFCS levels II–V. RESULTSParticipants showed little reluctance to wearing accelerometers; one participant reported discomfort. Nonambulatory adults (GMFCS levels IV–V) differed from ambulatory adults (GMFCS levels I–III) for recorded activity counts (hip and wrist sites), minutes of MVPA with each cut-point value, and breaks from sedentary time (all P < 0.05). For the same measures, adults in GMFCS level III also differed from GMFCS level I (all P < 0.05). The PARA-SCI correlated significantly with accelerometer-derived minutes of MVPA per day (r = 0.396; P = 0.014) and per hour of monitoring time (r = 0.356; P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONSOur findings support the use of accelerometers to objectively measure HPA and sedentary behavior in adults with CP across the severity spectrum, regardless of cut-point implementation. The PARA-SCI is a valid tool to capture subjectively reported patterns of MVPA in adults with CP who are GMFCS levels II–V.