Loading…
INDICADORES DE DESEMPENHO AMBIENTAL EVIDENCIADOS NOS RELAToRIOS DE SUSTENTABILIDADE: UMA ANALISE A LUZ DE ATRIBUTOS DE QUALIDADE/ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS SHOWN IN THE REPORTING OF SUSTAINABILITY: AN ANALYSIS OF THE LIGHT OF QUALITY ATTRIBUTES
Sustainability reports are published by companies for different reasons: to show their positive environmental performance - theory of voluntary disclosure; to change their legitimacy status - legitimacy theory - or to respond to stakeholders - stakeholder theory. Therefore, not all information is in...
Saved in:
Published in: | RGSA : Revista de Gestão Social e Ambiental 2014-01, Vol.8 (1), p.2-2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Sustainability reports are published by companies for different reasons: to show their positive environmental performance - theory of voluntary disclosure; to change their legitimacy status - legitimacy theory - or to respond to stakeholders - stakeholder theory. Therefore, not all information is indicated with the same level of transparency and quality. The objective of this research is to analyze the environmental performance indicators shown in sustainability reports of companies listed on the Corporate Sustainability Index (ISE). To accomplish this, the following quality attributes were looked into: responsiveness, integrity, neutrality and comparability. Descriptive research was conducted; predominantly qualitative, and drew on elements of the technique of content analysis. There were 35 reports selected, from which were analyzed a total of 30 environmental indicators disclosed in accordance with GRI guidelines. The results showed that the indicators with a higher level of quality were those reporting on emissions of greenhouse gases; on the disposal of waste and on water and energy consumption. The most common quality attribute in the disclosures of the 30 indicators was comparability. This is primarily due to the omission of targets, a lack of external reference points, and the lack of standardization in the disclosure of the indicators. It was concluded that organizations need to continue working to ensure clarity, balance and relevance of the information disclosed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1981-982X |
DOI: | 10.5773/rgsa.v8i1.790 |