Loading…
A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial
Abstract Objectives The incidence of pertussis has tripled in the past five years. Infants can be protected by “cocooning,” or vaccinating household contacts with the Tdap vaccine. However, Tdap coverage for adult caregivers of infants is low. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of inter...
Saved in:
Published in: | Vaccine 2016-02, Vol.34 (6), p.839-845 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3 |
container_end_page | 845 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 839 |
container_title | Vaccine |
container_volume | 34 |
creator | Buttenheim, Alison M Fiks, Alexander G Burson II, Randall C Wang, Eileen Coffin, Susan E Metlay, Joshua P Feemster, Kristen A |
description | Abstract Objectives The incidence of pertussis has tripled in the past five years. Infants can be protected by “cocooning,” or vaccinating household contacts with the Tdap vaccine. However, Tdap coverage for adult caregivers of infants is low. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of interventions informed by behavioral economics (retail pharmacy vouchers for Tdap vaccines and a celebrity public service announcement) to increase Tdap vaccination among caregivers of young infants. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled feasibility trial among adults attending newborn well-child visits at an urban Philadelphia pediatric primary care clinic who were not previously vaccinated with Tdap. Participants were randomized to one of four conditions: ($5-off Tdap voucher vs. free voucher)×(watching a 1 min video public service announcement (PSA) about Tdap vaccination vs. no PSA). Tdap vaccination was assessed by tracking voucher redemption and following up with participants by phone. Results Ninety-five adult caregivers of 74 infants were enrolled in the study (mean age 29.3 years; 61% male; relationship to newborn: 54% father, 33% mother, 13% grandparent or other; caregiver insurance status: 35% Medicaid, 34% private insurance, 32% uninsured). Only 1 subject redeemed the retail pharmacy Tdap voucher. Follow-up interviews suggest that, even with the voucher, significant barriers to vaccination remained including: delaying planned vaccination, perceived inconvenient pharmacy locations, and beliefs about pertussis risk and severity. Conclusions Despite leveraging existing infrastructure for adult vaccination, results suggest that retail pharmacy vouchers delivered during a newborn visit are not an effective strategy for promoting Tdap. Alternate approaches are needed that prioritize convenience and provide an immediate opportunity to vaccinate when motivation is high. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.068 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765970413</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0264410X15017491</els_id><sourcerecordid>1760922790</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkkGL1TAQx4so7tvVj6AEvHhpzaRNmnpweSyuCgse3IO3kKbTNc82eSZt4Ql-d1PfU2EvCkOGwG_-w8x_suwZ0AIoiFe7YtHGWIcFo8ALgIIK-SDbgKzLnHGQD7MNZaLKK6Cfz7LzGHeUUl5C8zg7Y0JIwWvYZD-2pMUverE-6IGg8c6P1kRi3YRhQTdZ78jk098E1BHJHsM0x2gjOfbXvwg9eneXoF67iRgd8M4uGOJrsiVBuy5pfseO9EnBtnaw04FMwerhSfao10PEp6d8kd1ev729ep_ffHz34Wp7k5tKwpRzbFMIaRpaGdpRIdraMC47bppeQiuAV5LWrOlQyrJNr5Y94zVrWUdlX15kL4-y--C_zRgnNdpocBi0Qz9HBbXgTU0rKP8HpQ1jdUMT-uIeuvNzcGmOlWIlSxvmieJHygQfY8Be7YMddTgooGp1Uu3UyUm1OqkAVHIy1T0_qc_tiN2fqt_WJeDyCGBa3GIxqGgsOoOdDWgm1Xn7zxZv7imYwTpr9PAVDxj_TqMiU1R9Ws9pvSbgFOqqgfInBTTIYg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1762326575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Buttenheim, Alison M ; Fiks, Alexander G ; Burson II, Randall C ; Wang, Eileen ; Coffin, Susan E ; Metlay, Joshua P ; Feemster, Kristen A</creator><creatorcontrib>Buttenheim, Alison M ; Fiks, Alexander G ; Burson II, Randall C ; Wang, Eileen ; Coffin, Susan E ; Metlay, Joshua P ; Feemster, Kristen A</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Objectives The incidence of pertussis has tripled in the past five years. Infants can be protected by “cocooning,” or vaccinating household contacts with the Tdap vaccine. However, Tdap coverage for adult caregivers of infants is low. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of interventions informed by behavioral economics (retail pharmacy vouchers for Tdap vaccines and a celebrity public service announcement) to increase Tdap vaccination among caregivers of young infants. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled feasibility trial among adults attending newborn well-child visits at an urban Philadelphia pediatric primary care clinic who were not previously vaccinated with Tdap. Participants were randomized to one of four conditions: ($5-off Tdap voucher vs. free voucher)×(watching a 1 min video public service announcement (PSA) about Tdap vaccination vs. no PSA). Tdap vaccination was assessed by tracking voucher redemption and following up with participants by phone. Results Ninety-five adult caregivers of 74 infants were enrolled in the study (mean age 29.3 years; 61% male; relationship to newborn: 54% father, 33% mother, 13% grandparent or other; caregiver insurance status: 35% Medicaid, 34% private insurance, 32% uninsured). Only 1 subject redeemed the retail pharmacy Tdap voucher. Follow-up interviews suggest that, even with the voucher, significant barriers to vaccination remained including: delaying planned vaccination, perceived inconvenient pharmacy locations, and beliefs about pertussis risk and severity. Conclusions Despite leveraging existing infrastructure for adult vaccination, results suggest that retail pharmacy vouchers delivered during a newborn visit are not an effective strategy for promoting Tdap. Alternate approaches are needed that prioritize convenience and provide an immediate opportunity to vaccinate when motivation is high.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-410X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2518</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.068</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26686571</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Allergy and Immunology ; Behavioral economics ; Bias ; Caregivers ; Celebrities ; Costs ; Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use ; Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine ; Drug stores ; Economics ; Economics, Behavioral ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Health Promotion - methods ; Hospitals ; Humans ; Infant ; Infant, Newborn ; Infants ; Intervention ; Male ; Pediatrics ; Pharmacy ; Philadelphia ; Postpartum period ; Studies ; Tetanus ; Vaccination ; Vaccination - economics ; Vaccination - statistics & numerical data ; Vaccines ; Whooping cough ; Whooping Cough - prevention & control</subject><ispartof>Vaccine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (6), p.839-845</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><rights>Copyright Elsevier Limited Feb 3, 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26686571$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Buttenheim, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiks, Alexander G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burson II, Randall C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffin, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metlay, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feemster, Kristen A</creatorcontrib><title>A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial</title><title>Vaccine</title><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><description>Abstract Objectives The incidence of pertussis has tripled in the past five years. Infants can be protected by “cocooning,” or vaccinating household contacts with the Tdap vaccine. However, Tdap coverage for adult caregivers of infants is low. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of interventions informed by behavioral economics (retail pharmacy vouchers for Tdap vaccines and a celebrity public service announcement) to increase Tdap vaccination among caregivers of young infants. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled feasibility trial among adults attending newborn well-child visits at an urban Philadelphia pediatric primary care clinic who were not previously vaccinated with Tdap. Participants were randomized to one of four conditions: ($5-off Tdap voucher vs. free voucher)×(watching a 1 min video public service announcement (PSA) about Tdap vaccination vs. no PSA). Tdap vaccination was assessed by tracking voucher redemption and following up with participants by phone. Results Ninety-five adult caregivers of 74 infants were enrolled in the study (mean age 29.3 years; 61% male; relationship to newborn: 54% father, 33% mother, 13% grandparent or other; caregiver insurance status: 35% Medicaid, 34% private insurance, 32% uninsured). Only 1 subject redeemed the retail pharmacy Tdap voucher. Follow-up interviews suggest that, even with the voucher, significant barriers to vaccination remained including: delaying planned vaccination, perceived inconvenient pharmacy locations, and beliefs about pertussis risk and severity. Conclusions Despite leveraging existing infrastructure for adult vaccination, results suggest that retail pharmacy vouchers delivered during a newborn visit are not an effective strategy for promoting Tdap. Alternate approaches are needed that prioritize convenience and provide an immediate opportunity to vaccinate when motivation is high.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Allergy and Immunology</subject><subject>Behavioral economics</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Caregivers</subject><subject>Celebrities</subject><subject>Costs</subject><subject>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine</subject><subject>Drug stores</subject><subject>Economics</subject><subject>Economics, Behavioral</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Health Promotion - methods</subject><subject>Hospitals</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>Infant, Newborn</subject><subject>Infants</subject><subject>Intervention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Pediatrics</subject><subject>Pharmacy</subject><subject>Philadelphia</subject><subject>Postpartum period</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>Tetanus</subject><subject>Vaccination</subject><subject>Vaccination - economics</subject><subject>Vaccination - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Vaccines</subject><subject>Whooping cough</subject><subject>Whooping Cough - prevention & control</subject><issn>0264-410X</issn><issn>1873-2518</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkkGL1TAQx4so7tvVj6AEvHhpzaRNmnpweSyuCgse3IO3kKbTNc82eSZt4Ql-d1PfU2EvCkOGwG_-w8x_suwZ0AIoiFe7YtHGWIcFo8ALgIIK-SDbgKzLnHGQD7MNZaLKK6Cfz7LzGHeUUl5C8zg7Y0JIwWvYZD-2pMUverE-6IGg8c6P1kRi3YRhQTdZ78jk098E1BHJHsM0x2gjOfbXvwg9eneXoF67iRgd8M4uGOJrsiVBuy5pfseO9EnBtnaw04FMwerhSfao10PEp6d8kd1ev729ep_ffHz34Wp7k5tKwpRzbFMIaRpaGdpRIdraMC47bppeQiuAV5LWrOlQyrJNr5Y94zVrWUdlX15kL4-y--C_zRgnNdpocBi0Qz9HBbXgTU0rKP8HpQ1jdUMT-uIeuvNzcGmOlWIlSxvmieJHygQfY8Be7YMddTgooGp1Uu3UyUm1OqkAVHIy1T0_qc_tiN2fqt_WJeDyCGBa3GIxqGgsOoOdDWgm1Xn7zxZv7imYwTpr9PAVDxj_TqMiU1R9Ws9pvSbgFOqqgfInBTTIYg</recordid><startdate>20160203</startdate><enddate>20160203</enddate><creator>Buttenheim, Alison M</creator><creator>Fiks, Alexander G</creator><creator>Burson II, Randall C</creator><creator>Wang, Eileen</creator><creator>Coffin, Susan E</creator><creator>Metlay, Joshua P</creator><creator>Feemster, Kristen A</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier Limited</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7T2</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88C</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9-</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0R</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M0T</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160203</creationdate><title>A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial</title><author>Buttenheim, Alison M ; Fiks, Alexander G ; Burson II, Randall C ; Wang, Eileen ; Coffin, Susan E ; Metlay, Joshua P ; Feemster, Kristen A</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Allergy and Immunology</topic><topic>Behavioral economics</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Caregivers</topic><topic>Celebrities</topic><topic>Costs</topic><topic>Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine</topic><topic>Drug stores</topic><topic>Economics</topic><topic>Economics, Behavioral</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Health Promotion - methods</topic><topic>Hospitals</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>Infant, Newborn</topic><topic>Infants</topic><topic>Intervention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Pediatrics</topic><topic>Pharmacy</topic><topic>Philadelphia</topic><topic>Postpartum period</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>Tetanus</topic><topic>Vaccination</topic><topic>Vaccination - economics</topic><topic>Vaccination - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Vaccines</topic><topic>Whooping cough</topic><topic>Whooping Cough - prevention & control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Buttenheim, Alison M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fiks, Alexander G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Burson II, Randall C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Eileen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Coffin, Susan E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Metlay, Joshua P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feemster, Kristen A</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health and Safety Science Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Consumer Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Healthcare Administration Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Buttenheim, Alison M</au><au>Fiks, Alexander G</au><au>Burson II, Randall C</au><au>Wang, Eileen</au><au>Coffin, Susan E</au><au>Metlay, Joshua P</au><au>Feemster, Kristen A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial</atitle><jtitle>Vaccine</jtitle><addtitle>Vaccine</addtitle><date>2016-02-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>34</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>839</spage><epage>845</epage><pages>839-845</pages><issn>0264-410X</issn><eissn>1873-2518</eissn><abstract>Abstract Objectives The incidence of pertussis has tripled in the past five years. Infants can be protected by “cocooning,” or vaccinating household contacts with the Tdap vaccine. However, Tdap coverage for adult caregivers of infants is low. This study evaluated the feasibility and impact of interventions informed by behavioral economics (retail pharmacy vouchers for Tdap vaccines and a celebrity public service announcement) to increase Tdap vaccination among caregivers of young infants. Methods We conducted a randomized controlled feasibility trial among adults attending newborn well-child visits at an urban Philadelphia pediatric primary care clinic who were not previously vaccinated with Tdap. Participants were randomized to one of four conditions: ($5-off Tdap voucher vs. free voucher)×(watching a 1 min video public service announcement (PSA) about Tdap vaccination vs. no PSA). Tdap vaccination was assessed by tracking voucher redemption and following up with participants by phone. Results Ninety-five adult caregivers of 74 infants were enrolled in the study (mean age 29.3 years; 61% male; relationship to newborn: 54% father, 33% mother, 13% grandparent or other; caregiver insurance status: 35% Medicaid, 34% private insurance, 32% uninsured). Only 1 subject redeemed the retail pharmacy Tdap voucher. Follow-up interviews suggest that, even with the voucher, significant barriers to vaccination remained including: delaying planned vaccination, perceived inconvenient pharmacy locations, and beliefs about pertussis risk and severity. Conclusions Despite leveraging existing infrastructure for adult vaccination, results suggest that retail pharmacy vouchers delivered during a newborn visit are not an effective strategy for promoting Tdap. Alternate approaches are needed that prioritize convenience and provide an immediate opportunity to vaccinate when motivation is high.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>26686571</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.068</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-410X |
ispartof | Vaccine, 2016-02, Vol.34 (6), p.839-845 |
issn | 0264-410X 1873-2518 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1765970413 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Adult Allergy and Immunology Behavioral economics Bias Caregivers Celebrities Costs Diphtheria-Tetanus-acellular Pertussis Vaccines - therapeutic use Diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine Drug stores Economics Economics, Behavioral Feasibility Studies Female Health Promotion - methods Hospitals Humans Infant Infant, Newborn Infants Intervention Male Pediatrics Pharmacy Philadelphia Postpartum period Studies Tetanus Vaccination Vaccination - economics Vaccination - statistics & numerical data Vaccines Whooping cough Whooping Cough - prevention & control |
title | A behavioral economics intervention to increase pertussis vaccination among infant caregivers: A randomized feasibility trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T21%3A37%3A57IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20behavioral%20economics%20intervention%20to%20increase%20pertussis%20vaccination%20among%20infant%20caregivers:%20A%20randomized%20feasibility%20trial&rft.jtitle=Vaccine&rft.au=Buttenheim,%20Alison%20M&rft.date=2016-02-03&rft.volume=34&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=839&rft.epage=845&rft.pages=839-845&rft.issn=0264-410X&rft.eissn=1873-2518&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.11.068&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1760922790%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-5eb5eb68c904c0d066b7c258d5c9f81b615480729de883bde8a8f2572b2d08f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1762326575&rft_id=info:pmid/26686571&rfr_iscdi=true |