LTD, RP, and Motor Learning

• Published in: Cerebellum (London, England) England), 2016-02, Vol.15 (1), p.51-53
• Main Authors: Hirano, Tomoo, Yamazaki, Yoshito, Nakamura, Yoji
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Animals; Biomedical and Life Sciences; Biomedicine; Cerebellum - cytology; Cerebellum - physiology; Humans; Learning - physiology; Long-Term Synaptic Depression - physiology; Mice; Mice, Transgenic; Motor Activity - physiology; Neurobiology; Neurology; Neurosciences; Nystagmus, Optokinetic - physiology; Receptors, GABA - genetics; Reflex, Vestibulo-Ocular - physiology; Review
• ISSN: 1473-4222; 1473-4230
• DOI: 10.1007/s12311-015-0698-0

Long-term depression (LTD) at excitatory synapses between parallel fibers and a Purkinje cell has been regarded as a critical cellular mechanism for motor learning. However, it was demonstrated that normal motor learning occurs under LTD suppression, suggesting that cerebellar plasticity mechanisms other than LTD also contribute to motor learning. One candidate for such plasticity is rebound potentiation (RP), which is long-term potentiation at inhibitory synapses between a stellate cell and a Purkinje cell. Both LTD and RP are induced by the increase in postsynaptic Ca 2+ concentration, and work to suppress the activity of a Purkinje cell. Thus, LTD and RP might work synergistically, and one might compensate defects of the other. RP induction is dependent on the interaction between GABA A receptor and GABA A receptor binding protein (GABARAP). Transgenic mice expressing a peptide which inhibits binding of GABARAP and GABA A receptor only in Purkinje cells show defects in both RP and adaptation of vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR), a motor learning paradigm. However, another example of motor learning, adaptation of optokinetic response (OKR), is normal in the transgenic mice. Both VOR and OKR are reflex eye movements suppressing the slip of visual image on the retina during head movement. Previously, we reported that delphilin knockout mice show facilitated LTD induction and enhanced OKR adaptation, but we recently found that VOR adaptation was not enhanced in the knockout mice. These results together suggest that animals might use LTD and RP differently depending on motor learning tasks.