Tropical forest seeds in the household economy: effects of market participation among three sociocultural groups in the Upper Xingu region of the Brazilian Amazon

Government regulations have created new markets for non-timber forest products such as tropical forest seeds for ecological restoration and agroforestry in Brazil. This paper examines whether and how participation in the seed market has affected assets that will shape households’ ability to pursue n...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental conservation 2016-03, Vol.43 (1), p.13-23
Main Authors: URZEDO, D. I., VIDAL, E., SILLS, E. O., PIÑA-RODRIGUES, F. C. M., JUNQUEIRA, R. G. P.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Agroforestry
Amazon
assets
ecological restoration
Environmental restoration
Family income
farmers
Forest management
Forest products
Government regulations
Households
Human capital
income
interviews
laws and regulations
Livelihood
livelihood outcomes
new markets
non-timber forest products
nontimber forest products
seed network
Seeds
social capital
Sustainable development
Sustainable livelihood
Tropical forests
Urban agriculture
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Government regulations have created new markets for non-timber forest products such as tropical forest seeds for ecological restoration and agroforestry in Brazil. This paper examines whether and how participation in the seed market has affected assets that will shape households’ ability to pursue new livelihood opportunities. These impacts may vary across different dimensions of capital and among sociocultural groups. Impacts were characterized through semi-structured interviews following the sustainable livelihoods approach; 40 producers in the Xingu Seed Network, from settler farmer, urban and indigenous groups, were interviewed. The groups differed in perceptions of impacts on their natural, social and human capital, which could be related to the sociocultural background and vulnerability context of each group. Communities that were already organized were most likely to strengthen their social capital through participation. Cash income earned from sale of seeds was correlated with household-reported gains in financial capital, but not correlated with changes in other dimensions of capital. Contrary to expectations, sociocultural groups less integrated with the market achieved better livelihood outcomes through participation in the seed market.
ISSN:0376-8929
1469-4387
1469-4387
DOI:10.1017/S0376892915000247