Loading…
Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes
Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403 |
container_end_page | 311 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 305 |
container_title | Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom |
container_volume | 96 |
creator | Erpenbeck, Dirk Ekins, Merrick Enghuber, Nicole Hooper, John N.A. Lehnert, Helmut Poliseno, Angelo Schuster, Astrid Setiawan, Edwin De Voogd, Nicole J. Wörheide, Gert Van Soest, Rob W.M. |
description | Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/S0025315415000521 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768570160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0025315415000521</cupid><sourcerecordid>1768570160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWMoQ8I2TOBlRxa8qGIA5suObNCWxQ5wIuvEOvCFPQqJ2QCCmO5zvHJ17CDkGdgYMxPkjY37IIQwgZIyFPuyQCQRR4gkRJbtkMsreqO-TA-dWAwORiCfk7t52y9IUtDR05hprCjylqrSVLda0li_oqEPjkH59fFJ8z7Dp6NsSDVXSoabW0OXAdusG3SHZy2Xl8Gh7p-T56vJpfuMtHq5v5xcLL-MJ77wEI9SMg0iUljpXeRzoREkfYtRBpjX4sUINOddcA8gEQIFiUaSzWIggYHxKZpvcprWvPbourUuXYVVJg7Z3KYgoDsXw34ie_EJXtm_N0G6kAiFYzGCgYENlrXWuxTxt2rKW7ToFlo7rpn_WHTx865G1aktd4I_of13fMSh7pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764770801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3154</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0025315415000521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biology ; Case studies ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Evolution ; Holotypes ; Marine ; Morphology ; Museums ; Phylogenetics ; Reference materials ; Systematics ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0025315415000521/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enghuber, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, John N.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehnert, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliseno, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wörheide, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><title>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</title><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><description>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Holotypes</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0025-3154</issn><issn>1469-7769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWMoQ8I2TOBlRxa8qGIA5suObNCWxQ5wIuvEOvCFPQqJ2QCCmO5zvHJ17CDkGdgYMxPkjY37IIQwgZIyFPuyQCQRR4gkRJbtkMsreqO-TA-dWAwORiCfk7t52y9IUtDR05hprCjylqrSVLda0li_oqEPjkH59fFJ8z7Dp6NsSDVXSoabW0OXAdusG3SHZy2Xl8Gh7p-T56vJpfuMtHq5v5xcLL-MJ77wEI9SMg0iUljpXeRzoREkfYtRBpjX4sUINOddcA8gEQIFiUaSzWIggYHxKZpvcprWvPbourUuXYVVJg7Z3KYgoDsXw34ie_EJXtm_N0G6kAiFYzGCgYENlrXWuxTxt2rKW7ToFlo7rpn_WHTx865G1aktd4I_of13fMSh7pg</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creator><creator>Ekins, Merrick</creator><creator>Enghuber, Nicole</creator><creator>Hooper, John N.A.</creator><creator>Lehnert, Helmut</creator><creator>Poliseno, Angelo</creator><creator>Schuster, Astrid</creator><creator>Setiawan, Edwin</creator><creator>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creator><creator>Wörheide, Gert</creator><creator>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><author>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Holotypes</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enghuber, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, John N.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehnert, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliseno, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wörheide, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences & Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erpenbeck, Dirk</au><au>Ekins, Merrick</au><au>Enghuber, Nicole</au><au>Hooper, John N.A.</au><au>Lehnert, Helmut</au><au>Poliseno, Angelo</au><au>Schuster, Astrid</au><au>Setiawan, Edwin</au><au>De Voogd, Nicole J.</au><au>Wörheide, Gert</au><au>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>305-311</pages><issn>0025-3154</issn><eissn>1469-7769</eissn><abstract>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0025315415000521</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0025-3154 |
ispartof | Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311 |
issn | 0025-3154 1469-7769 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768570160 |
source | Cambridge Journals Online |
subjects | Biology Case studies Deoxyribonucleic acid DNA Evolution Holotypes Marine Morphology Museums Phylogenetics Reference materials Systematics Taxonomy |
title | Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nothing%20in%20(sponge)%20biology%20makes%20sense%20%E2%80%93%20except%20when%20based%20on%20holotypes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Marine%20Biological%20Association%20of%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.au=Erpenbeck,%20Dirk&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=305-311&rft.issn=0025-3154&rft.eissn=1469-7769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0025315415000521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768570160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764770801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0025315415000521&rfr_iscdi=true |