Loading…

Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes

Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311
Main Authors: Erpenbeck, Dirk, Ekins, Merrick, Enghuber, Nicole, Hooper, John N.A., Lehnert, Helmut, Poliseno, Angelo, Schuster, Astrid, Setiawan, Edwin, De Voogd, Nicole J., Wörheide, Gert, Van Soest, Rob W.M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403
container_end_page 311
container_issue 2
container_start_page 305
container_title Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom
container_volume 96
creator Erpenbeck, Dirk
Ekins, Merrick
Enghuber, Nicole
Hooper, John N.A.
Lehnert, Helmut
Poliseno, Angelo
Schuster, Astrid
Setiawan, Edwin
De Voogd, Nicole J.
Wörheide, Gert
Van Soest, Rob W.M.
description Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S0025315415000521
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768570160</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S0025315415000521</cupid><sourcerecordid>1768570160</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWMoQ8I2TOBlRxa8qGIA5suObNCWxQ5wIuvEOvCFPQqJ2QCCmO5zvHJ17CDkGdgYMxPkjY37IIQwgZIyFPuyQCQRR4gkRJbtkMsreqO-TA-dWAwORiCfk7t52y9IUtDR05hprCjylqrSVLda0li_oqEPjkH59fFJ8z7Dp6NsSDVXSoabW0OXAdusG3SHZy2Xl8Gh7p-T56vJpfuMtHq5v5xcLL-MJ77wEI9SMg0iUljpXeRzoREkfYtRBpjX4sUINOddcA8gEQIFiUaSzWIggYHxKZpvcprWvPbourUuXYVVJg7Z3KYgoDsXw34ie_EJXtm_N0G6kAiFYzGCgYENlrXWuxTxt2rKW7ToFlo7rpn_WHTx865G1aktd4I_of13fMSh7pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1764770801</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><source>Cambridge Journals Online</source><creator>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><description>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0025-3154</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7769</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S0025315415000521</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Biology ; Case studies ; Deoxyribonucleic acid ; DNA ; Evolution ; Holotypes ; Marine ; Morphology ; Museums ; Phylogenetics ; Reference materials ; Systematics ; Taxonomy</subject><ispartof>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311</ispartof><rights>Copyright © Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S0025315415000521/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,72832</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enghuber, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, John N.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehnert, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliseno, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wörheide, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><title>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</title><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><description>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</description><subject>Biology</subject><subject>Case studies</subject><subject>Deoxyribonucleic acid</subject><subject>DNA</subject><subject>Evolution</subject><subject>Holotypes</subject><subject>Marine</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Museums</subject><subject>Phylogenetics</subject><subject>Reference materials</subject><subject>Systematics</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><issn>0025-3154</issn><issn>1469-7769</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kL1OwzAUhS0EEqXwAGyWWMoQ8I2TOBlRxa8qGIA5suObNCWxQ5wIuvEOvCFPQqJ2QCCmO5zvHJ17CDkGdgYMxPkjY37IIQwgZIyFPuyQCQRR4gkRJbtkMsreqO-TA-dWAwORiCfk7t52y9IUtDR05hprCjylqrSVLda0li_oqEPjkH59fFJ8z7Dp6NsSDVXSoabW0OXAdusG3SHZy2Xl8Gh7p-T56vJpfuMtHq5v5xcLL-MJ77wEI9SMg0iUljpXeRzoREkfYtRBpjX4sUINOddcA8gEQIFiUaSzWIggYHxKZpvcprWvPbourUuXYVVJg7Z3KYgoDsXw34ie_EJXtm_N0G6kAiFYzGCgYENlrXWuxTxt2rKW7ToFlo7rpn_WHTx865G1aktd4I_of13fMSh7pg</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creator><creator>Ekins, Merrick</creator><creator>Enghuber, Nicole</creator><creator>Hooper, John N.A.</creator><creator>Lehnert, Helmut</creator><creator>Poliseno, Angelo</creator><creator>Schuster, Astrid</creator><creator>Setiawan, Edwin</creator><creator>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creator><creator>Wörheide, Gert</creator><creator>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7TN</scope><scope>88A</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H95</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</title><author>Erpenbeck, Dirk ; Ekins, Merrick ; Enghuber, Nicole ; Hooper, John N.A. ; Lehnert, Helmut ; Poliseno, Angelo ; Schuster, Astrid ; Setiawan, Edwin ; De Voogd, Nicole J. ; Wörheide, Gert ; Van Soest, Rob W.M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Biology</topic><topic>Case studies</topic><topic>Deoxyribonucleic acid</topic><topic>DNA</topic><topic>Evolution</topic><topic>Holotypes</topic><topic>Marine</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Museums</topic><topic>Phylogenetics</topic><topic>Reference materials</topic><topic>Systematics</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erpenbeck, Dirk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ekins, Merrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Enghuber, Nicole</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hooper, John N.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lehnert, Helmut</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poliseno, Angelo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Schuster, Astrid</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Setiawan, Edwin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>De Voogd, Nicole J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wörheide, Gert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Oceanic Abstracts</collection><collection>Biology Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 1: Biological Sciences &amp; Living Resources</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erpenbeck, Dirk</au><au>Ekins, Merrick</au><au>Enghuber, Nicole</au><au>Hooper, John N.A.</au><au>Lehnert, Helmut</au><au>Poliseno, Angelo</au><au>Schuster, Astrid</au><au>Setiawan, Edwin</au><au>De Voogd, Nicole J.</au><au>Wörheide, Gert</au><au>Van Soest, Rob W.M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom</jtitle><addtitle>J. Mar. Biol. Ass</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>96</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>305</spage><epage>311</epage><pages>305-311</pages><issn>0025-3154</issn><eissn>1469-7769</eissn><abstract>Sponge species are infamously difficult to identify for non-experts due to their high morphological plasticity and the paucity of informative morphological characters. The use of molecular techniques certainly helps with species identification, but unfortunately it requires prior reference sequences. Holotypes constitute the best reference material for species identification, however their usage in molecular systematics and taxonomy is scarce and frequently not even attempted, mostly due to their antiquity and preservation history. Here we provide case studies in which we demonstrate the importance of using holotype material to answer phylogenetic and taxonomic questions. We also demonstrate the possibility of sequencing DNA fragments out of century-old holotypes. Furthermore we propose the deposition of DNA sequences in conjunction with new species descriptions.</abstract><cop>Cambridge, UK</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S0025315415000521</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0025-3154
ispartof Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 2016-03, Vol.96 (2), p.305-311
issn 0025-3154
1469-7769
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768570160
source Cambridge Journals Online
subjects Biology
Case studies
Deoxyribonucleic acid
DNA
Evolution
Holotypes
Marine
Morphology
Museums
Phylogenetics
Reference materials
Systematics
Taxonomy
title Nothing in (sponge) biology makes sense – except when based on holotypes
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T23%3A04%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Nothing%20in%20(sponge)%20biology%20makes%20sense%20%E2%80%93%20except%20when%20based%20on%20holotypes&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20Marine%20Biological%20Association%20of%20the%20United%20Kingdom&rft.au=Erpenbeck,%20Dirk&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=96&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=305&rft.epage=311&rft.pages=305-311&rft.issn=0025-3154&rft.eissn=1469-7769&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S0025315415000521&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768570160%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c393t-9e6ed03179bdadfbf84d9ba218ed4cdd128bed1f3d3d11a911b1b066dc8774403%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1764770801&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S0025315415000521&rfr_iscdi=true