Loading…

Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda

A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Tropical animal health and production 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254
Main Authors: Oba, Peter, Ejobi, Francis, Omadang, Leonard, Chamai, Martin, Okwi, Andrew Livex, Othieno, Emmanuel, Inangolet, Francis Olaki, Ocaido, Michael
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3
container_end_page 254
container_issue 2
container_start_page 249
container_title Tropical animal health and production
container_volume 48
creator Oba, Peter
Ejobi, Francis
Omadang, Leonard
Chamai, Martin
Okwi, Andrew Livex
Othieno, Emmanuel
Inangolet, Francis Olaki
Ocaido, Michael
description A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768572566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3936203771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9PFTEUxRuikSf6AdhAEzdsRtvp_6USUBOMJvrWTWk7w8C8FtoZE_n03vcGjGFhXPWm93fOze0pQoeUvKWEqHeV0laQhlDREMNZc7-HVlQo1ijO9DO0IoSbhiuu9tHLWq8JAZWWL9B-K0UrjZArVL6V-NONMfmIXQq4DPUGd85PuVScO3zmr4aUffZ-rrgvLs1jrlAOqYt-GnKCCofcb2_wl1zylHc-H-abGKLDYahTGfy06697aLlX6HnnxhpfP5wHaH1-9uP0U3Px9ePn0_cXjefGTA2jQUlOmdBOCqlI56VywShJFTNa0BCCNlxfCke5cB0BSBrHdRt9hC0dO0Ani-9tyXdzrJPdDNXHcXQp5rlaqqQWqgXZ_6CUSwVPBuibJ-h1nkuCRXYUAUy3QNGF8iXXWmJnb8uwceWXpcRus7NLdhays9vs7D1ojh6c58tNDH8Uj2EB0C5AhVbqY_lr9D9cjxdR57J1PeRr199bQiX8BkE4U-w3HgmswQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761046782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26526956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control ; Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - parasitology ; Dogs ; Echinococcosis - epidemiology ; Echinococcosis - transmission ; Echinococcosis - veterinary ; Echinococcus granulosus ; Echinococcus granulosus - isolation &amp; purification ; Epidemiology ; Ethanol ; Feces - parasitology ; Life Sciences ; Parasite Egg Count ; Prevalence ; Public health ; Regular Article ; Risk Factors ; Uganda - epidemiology ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejobi, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omadang, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamai, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othieno, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</subject><subject>Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - transmission</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Echinococcus granulosus</subject><subject>Echinococcus granulosus - isolation &amp; purification</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Uganda - epidemiology</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk9PFTEUxRuikSf6AdhAEzdsRtvp_6USUBOMJvrWTWk7w8C8FtoZE_n03vcGjGFhXPWm93fOze0pQoeUvKWEqHeV0laQhlDREMNZc7-HVlQo1ijO9DO0IoSbhiuu9tHLWq8JAZWWL9B-K0UrjZArVL6V-NONMfmIXQq4DPUGd85PuVScO3zmr4aUffZ-rrgvLs1jrlAOqYt-GnKCCofcb2_wl1zylHc-H-abGKLDYahTGfy06697aLlX6HnnxhpfP5wHaH1-9uP0U3Px9ePn0_cXjefGTA2jQUlOmdBOCqlI56VywShJFTNa0BCCNlxfCke5cB0BSBrHdRt9hC0dO0Ani-9tyXdzrJPdDNXHcXQp5rlaqqQWqgXZ_6CUSwVPBuibJ-h1nkuCRXYUAUy3QNGF8iXXWmJnb8uwceWXpcRus7NLdhays9vs7D1ojh6c58tNDH8Uj2EB0C5AhVbqY_lr9D9cjxdR57J1PeRr199bQiX8BkE4U-w3HgmswQ</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Oba, Peter</creator><creator>Ejobi, Francis</creator><creator>Omadang, Leonard</creator><creator>Chamai, Martin</creator><creator>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creator><creator>Othieno, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creator><creator>Ocaido, Michael</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><author>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention &amp; control</topic><topic>Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - transmission</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Echinococcus granulosus</topic><topic>Echinococcus granulosus - isolation &amp; purification</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Uganda - epidemiology</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejobi, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omadang, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamai, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othieno, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oba, Peter</au><au>Ejobi, Francis</au><au>Omadang, Leonard</au><au>Chamai, Martin</au><au>Okwi, Andrew Livex</au><au>Othieno, Emmanuel</au><au>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</au><au>Ocaido, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>249-254</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>26526956</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0049-4747
ispartof Tropical animal health and production, 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254
issn 0049-4747
1573-7438
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768572566
source Springer Nature
subjects Animals
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Cattle
Cross-Sectional Studies
Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control
Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary
Dog Diseases - epidemiology
Dog Diseases - parasitology
Dogs
Echinococcosis - epidemiology
Echinococcosis - transmission
Echinococcosis - veterinary
Echinococcus granulosus
Echinococcus granulosus - isolation & purification
Epidemiology
Ethanol
Feces - parasitology
Life Sciences
Parasite Egg Count
Prevalence
Public health
Regular Article
Risk Factors
Uganda - epidemiology
Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science
Zoology
title Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20risk%20factors%20of%20Echinococcus%20granulosus%20infection%20in%20dogs%20in%20Moroto%20and%20Bukedea%20districts%20in%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Oba,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=249-254&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3936203771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761046782&rft_id=info:pmid/26526956&rfr_iscdi=true