Loading…
Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda
A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of...
Saved in:
Published in: | Tropical animal health and production 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3 |
container_end_page | 254 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 249 |
container_title | Tropical animal health and production |
container_volume | 48 |
creator | Oba, Peter Ejobi, Francis Omadang, Leonard Chamai, Martin Okwi, Andrew Livex Othieno, Emmanuel Inangolet, Francis Olaki Ocaido, Michael |
description | A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768572566</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3936203771</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkk9PFTEUxRuikSf6AdhAEzdsRtvp_6USUBOMJvrWTWk7w8C8FtoZE_n03vcGjGFhXPWm93fOze0pQoeUvKWEqHeV0laQhlDREMNZc7-HVlQo1ijO9DO0IoSbhiuu9tHLWq8JAZWWL9B-K0UrjZArVL6V-NONMfmIXQq4DPUGd85PuVScO3zmr4aUffZ-rrgvLs1jrlAOqYt-GnKCCofcb2_wl1zylHc-H-abGKLDYahTGfy06697aLlX6HnnxhpfP5wHaH1-9uP0U3Px9ePn0_cXjefGTA2jQUlOmdBOCqlI56VywShJFTNa0BCCNlxfCke5cB0BSBrHdRt9hC0dO0Ani-9tyXdzrJPdDNXHcXQp5rlaqqQWqgXZ_6CUSwVPBuibJ-h1nkuCRXYUAUy3QNGF8iXXWmJnb8uwceWXpcRus7NLdhays9vs7D1ojh6c58tNDH8Uj2EB0C5AhVbqY_lr9D9cjxdR57J1PeRr199bQiX8BkE4U-w3HgmswQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1761046782</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</creator><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><description>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0049-4747</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-7438</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26526956</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Animals ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Cattle ; Cross-Sectional Studies ; Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control ; Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary ; Dog Diseases - epidemiology ; Dog Diseases - parasitology ; Dogs ; Echinococcosis - epidemiology ; Echinococcosis - transmission ; Echinococcosis - veterinary ; Echinococcus granulosus ; Echinococcus granulosus - isolation & purification ; Epidemiology ; Ethanol ; Feces - parasitology ; Life Sciences ; Parasite Egg Count ; Prevalence ; Public health ; Regular Article ; Risk Factors ; Uganda - epidemiology ; Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science ; Zoology</subject><ispartof>Tropical animal health and production, 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26526956$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejobi, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omadang, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamai, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othieno, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><title>Tropical animal health and production</title><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><description>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</description><subject>Animals</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cross-Sectional Studies</subject><subject>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control</subject><subject>Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</subject><subject>Dog Diseases - parasitology</subject><subject>Dogs</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - epidemiology</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - transmission</subject><subject>Echinococcosis - veterinary</subject><subject>Echinococcus granulosus</subject><subject>Echinococcus granulosus - isolation & purification</subject><subject>Epidemiology</subject><subject>Ethanol</subject><subject>Feces - parasitology</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Parasite Egg Count</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><subject>Public health</subject><subject>Regular Article</subject><subject>Risk Factors</subject><subject>Uganda - epidemiology</subject><subject>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</subject><subject>Zoology</subject><issn>0049-4747</issn><issn>1573-7438</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkk9PFTEUxRuikSf6AdhAEzdsRtvp_6USUBOMJvrWTWk7w8C8FtoZE_n03vcGjGFhXPWm93fOze0pQoeUvKWEqHeV0laQhlDREMNZc7-HVlQo1ijO9DO0IoSbhiuu9tHLWq8JAZWWL9B-K0UrjZArVL6V-NONMfmIXQq4DPUGd85PuVScO3zmr4aUffZ-rrgvLs1jrlAOqYt-GnKCCofcb2_wl1zylHc-H-abGKLDYahTGfy06697aLlX6HnnxhpfP5wHaH1-9uP0U3Px9ePn0_cXjefGTA2jQUlOmdBOCqlI56VywShJFTNa0BCCNlxfCke5cB0BSBrHdRt9hC0dO0Ani-9tyXdzrJPdDNXHcXQp5rlaqqQWqgXZ_6CUSwVPBuibJ-h1nkuCRXYUAUy3QNGF8iXXWmJnb8uwceWXpcRus7NLdhays9vs7D1ojh6c58tNDH8Uj2EB0C5AhVbqY_lr9D9cjxdR57J1PeRr199bQiX8BkE4U-w3HgmswQ</recordid><startdate>20160201</startdate><enddate>20160201</enddate><creator>Oba, Peter</creator><creator>Ejobi, Francis</creator><creator>Omadang, Leonard</creator><creator>Chamai, Martin</creator><creator>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creator><creator>Othieno, Emmanuel</creator><creator>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creator><creator>Ocaido, Michael</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160201</creationdate><title>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</title><author>Oba, Peter ; Ejobi, Francis ; Omadang, Leonard ; Chamai, Martin ; Okwi, Andrew Livex ; Othieno, Emmanuel ; Inangolet, Francis Olaki ; Ocaido, Michael</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Animals</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cross-Sectional Studies</topic><topic>Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control</topic><topic>Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - epidemiology</topic><topic>Dog Diseases - parasitology</topic><topic>Dogs</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - epidemiology</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - transmission</topic><topic>Echinococcosis - veterinary</topic><topic>Echinococcus granulosus</topic><topic>Echinococcus granulosus - isolation & purification</topic><topic>Epidemiology</topic><topic>Ethanol</topic><topic>Feces - parasitology</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Parasite Egg Count</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><topic>Public health</topic><topic>Regular Article</topic><topic>Risk Factors</topic><topic>Uganda - epidemiology</topic><topic>Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science</topic><topic>Zoology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Oba, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ejobi, Francis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omadang, Leonard</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chamai, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Okwi, Andrew Livex</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Othieno, Emmanuel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ocaido, Michael</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Oba, Peter</au><au>Ejobi, Francis</au><au>Omadang, Leonard</au><au>Chamai, Martin</au><au>Okwi, Andrew Livex</au><au>Othieno, Emmanuel</au><au>Inangolet, Francis Olaki</au><au>Ocaido, Michael</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda</atitle><jtitle>Tropical animal health and production</jtitle><stitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</stitle><addtitle>Trop Anim Health Prod</addtitle><date>2016-02-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>48</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>249</spage><epage>254</epage><pages>249-254</pages><issn>0049-4747</issn><eissn>1573-7438</eissn><abstract>A cross sectional study was conducted in Moroto and Bukedea districts of Uganda from May to September 2013 to determine the prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs. Fresh dog faecal samples were collected, preserved in 70 % ethanol, and later screened for presence of taeniid eggs using zinc chloride floatation method. Positive samples were confirmed by a copro-PCR (polymerase chain reaction) for E. granulosus using NADH dehydrogenase sub-unit 1 gene (NADH1) as a target molecular marker. Structured questionnaires and focus group discussions were used to collect quantitative and qualitative data for risk factor identification. Study sub-counties were selected by simple random sampling. Overall apparent prevalence of taeniid infection in dogs of 14.9 % (39/261, confidence interval 10.6–19.2) in both districts was recorded using the faecal floatation test. The sensitivity of the faecal floatation test was found to be 78 % (25/32), while the specificity was 93 % (215/229). Copro-PCR results revealed a true prevalence of 14.4 % (9.91–19.0, 95 % CI) in dogs in Moroto district and 7.4 % (2.14–12.60, 95 % CI) in Bukedea district. The overall true prevalence of cystic echinococcosis (CE) was 12.2 % (8.70–15.76, 95 % CI) in both districts. The major risk factors identified using logistic regression were uncontrolled access of dogs to animal slaughter facilities, higher cattle herd sizes and lack of knowledge about the disease. It was recommended that restricting dog access to infected tissues and public health education about epidemiology of CE should be done.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><pmid>26526956</pmid><doi>10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0049-4747 |
ispartof | Tropical animal health and production, 2016-02, Vol.48 (2), p.249-254 |
issn | 0049-4747 1573-7438 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768572566 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Animals Biomedical and Life Sciences Cattle Cross-Sectional Studies Disease Transmission, Infectious - prevention & control Disease Transmission, Infectious - veterinary Dog Diseases - epidemiology Dog Diseases - parasitology Dogs Echinococcosis - epidemiology Echinococcosis - transmission Echinococcosis - veterinary Echinococcus granulosus Echinococcus granulosus - isolation & purification Epidemiology Ethanol Feces - parasitology Life Sciences Parasite Egg Count Prevalence Public health Regular Article Risk Factors Uganda - epidemiology Veterinary Medicine/Veterinary Science Zoology |
title | Prevalence and risk factors of Echinococcus granulosus infection in dogs in Moroto and Bukedea districts in Uganda |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T14%3A12%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prevalence%20and%20risk%20factors%20of%20Echinococcus%20granulosus%20infection%20in%20dogs%20in%20Moroto%20and%20Bukedea%20districts%20in%20Uganda&rft.jtitle=Tropical%20animal%20health%20and%20production&rft.au=Oba,%20Peter&rft.date=2016-02-01&rft.volume=48&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=249&rft.epage=254&rft.pages=249-254&rft.issn=0049-4747&rft.eissn=1573-7438&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11250-015-0943-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3936203771%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c499t-31d7641358a65670fc67ad9761739851ddd8948b5a145af065669a482ece086a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1761046782&rft_id=info:pmid/26526956&rfr_iscdi=true |