Loading…
Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses
An under-investigated aspect of handedness, a biological proxy for cerebral laterality for language, is its prevalence amongst deaf individuals. We present four sets of meta-analyses on studies measuring handedness prevalence in deaf individuals, comprising 31 data sets and totaling 5,392 participan...
Saved in:
Published in: | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews 2016-01, Vol.60, p.98-114 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33 |
container_end_page | 114 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 98 |
container_title | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews |
container_volume | 60 |
creator | Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta Sáfár, Anna |
description | An under-investigated aspect of handedness, a biological proxy for cerebral laterality for language, is its prevalence amongst deaf individuals. We present four sets of meta-analyses on studies measuring handedness prevalence in deaf individuals, comprising 31 data sets and totaling 5,392 participants (4,606 deaf, 786 hearing). Deaf individuals were found to be 2.61 times more likely to be non-right-handed and 2.25 times more likely to be left-handed compared to their hearing counterparts. When handedness was measured by means of manipulative actions, the weighted estimates of handedness prevalence for deaf populations were 17.70% and 14.70% for non-right- and left-handedness respectively; when handedness was measured by means of sign actions, the prevalence was 10.60% and 9.70%, respectively. Yet, when comparing studies that measured handedness in the same deaf individuals using both manipulative and sign actions, no difference was found in their handedness prevalence. This pattern is taken to suggest that the higher prevalence of atypical handedness in the deaf population may be linked to delayed language acquisition. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.013 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580549</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1768580549</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRbK3-Bc3STeJ78x13ImqFipvuh2nmBVPSpGYSof_elNauXd3NuffCYewOIUNA_bDOGhpWVdvRT8YBVYaYAYozNkVrRGoUt-dsCijz1GghJ-wqxjUAcBDqkk241gINmimDuW8ChYZiTLbjmq-pKSipmqT_oiSQLx-TD-p96htf7yLFa3ZR-jrSzTFnbPn6snyep4vPt_fnp0VaCKn7tPQGAnJZFh65sB5RqcA1Fiq33BZoyEgvg8KVyQVqKZBKhcZD0MgLIWbs_jC77drvgWLvNlUsqK59Q-0QHRptlQUl8_-gYFUuJYyoOaBF18bYUem2XbXx3c4huL1Yt3YnsW4v1iG6UezYvD2eDKsNhVPvz6T4BeeRdMk</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1760859440</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta ; Sáfár, Anna</creator><creatorcontrib>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta ; Sáfár, Anna</creatorcontrib><description>An under-investigated aspect of handedness, a biological proxy for cerebral laterality for language, is its prevalence amongst deaf individuals. We present four sets of meta-analyses on studies measuring handedness prevalence in deaf individuals, comprising 31 data sets and totaling 5,392 participants (4,606 deaf, 786 hearing). Deaf individuals were found to be 2.61 times more likely to be non-right-handed and 2.25 times more likely to be left-handed compared to their hearing counterparts. When handedness was measured by means of manipulative actions, the weighted estimates of handedness prevalence for deaf populations were 17.70% and 14.70% for non-right- and left-handedness respectively; when handedness was measured by means of sign actions, the prevalence was 10.60% and 9.70%, respectively. Yet, when comparing studies that measured handedness in the same deaf individuals using both manipulative and sign actions, no difference was found in their handedness prevalence. This pattern is taken to suggest that the higher prevalence of atypical handedness in the deaf population may be linked to delayed language acquisition.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0149-7634</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-7528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.013</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26631717</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>Deafness - epidemiology ; Functional Laterality ; Humans ; Prevalence</subject><ispartof>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2016-01, Vol.60, p.98-114</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26631717$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáfár, Anna</creatorcontrib><title>Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses</title><title>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</title><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><description>An under-investigated aspect of handedness, a biological proxy for cerebral laterality for language, is its prevalence amongst deaf individuals. We present four sets of meta-analyses on studies measuring handedness prevalence in deaf individuals, comprising 31 data sets and totaling 5,392 participants (4,606 deaf, 786 hearing). Deaf individuals were found to be 2.61 times more likely to be non-right-handed and 2.25 times more likely to be left-handed compared to their hearing counterparts. When handedness was measured by means of manipulative actions, the weighted estimates of handedness prevalence for deaf populations were 17.70% and 14.70% for non-right- and left-handedness respectively; when handedness was measured by means of sign actions, the prevalence was 10.60% and 9.70%, respectively. Yet, when comparing studies that measured handedness in the same deaf individuals using both manipulative and sign actions, no difference was found in their handedness prevalence. This pattern is taken to suggest that the higher prevalence of atypical handedness in the deaf population may be linked to delayed language acquisition.</description><subject>Deafness - epidemiology</subject><subject>Functional Laterality</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Prevalence</subject><issn>0149-7634</issn><issn>1873-7528</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkE1Lw0AURQdRbK3-Bc3STeJ78x13ImqFipvuh2nmBVPSpGYSof_elNauXd3NuffCYewOIUNA_bDOGhpWVdvRT8YBVYaYAYozNkVrRGoUt-dsCijz1GghJ-wqxjUAcBDqkk241gINmimDuW8ChYZiTLbjmq-pKSipmqT_oiSQLx-TD-p96htf7yLFa3ZR-jrSzTFnbPn6snyep4vPt_fnp0VaCKn7tPQGAnJZFh65sB5RqcA1Fiq33BZoyEgvg8KVyQVqKZBKhcZD0MgLIWbs_jC77drvgWLvNlUsqK59Q-0QHRptlQUl8_-gYFUuJYyoOaBF18bYUem2XbXx3c4huL1Yt3YnsW4v1iG6UezYvD2eDKsNhVPvz6T4BeeRdMk</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta</creator><creator>Sáfár, Anna</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7TK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses</title><author>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta ; Sáfár, Anna</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Deafness - epidemiology</topic><topic>Functional Laterality</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Prevalence</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sáfár, Anna</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Papadatou-Pastou, Marietta</au><au>Sáfár, Anna</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses</atitle><jtitle>Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews</jtitle><addtitle>Neurosci Biobehav Rev</addtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>60</volume><spage>98</spage><epage>114</epage><pages>98-114</pages><issn>0149-7634</issn><eissn>1873-7528</eissn><abstract>An under-investigated aspect of handedness, a biological proxy for cerebral laterality for language, is its prevalence amongst deaf individuals. We present four sets of meta-analyses on studies measuring handedness prevalence in deaf individuals, comprising 31 data sets and totaling 5,392 participants (4,606 deaf, 786 hearing). Deaf individuals were found to be 2.61 times more likely to be non-right-handed and 2.25 times more likely to be left-handed compared to their hearing counterparts. When handedness was measured by means of manipulative actions, the weighted estimates of handedness prevalence for deaf populations were 17.70% and 14.70% for non-right- and left-handedness respectively; when handedness was measured by means of sign actions, the prevalence was 10.60% and 9.70%, respectively. Yet, when comparing studies that measured handedness in the same deaf individuals using both manipulative and sign actions, no difference was found in their handedness prevalence. This pattern is taken to suggest that the higher prevalence of atypical handedness in the deaf population may be linked to delayed language acquisition.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>26631717</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.013</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0149-7634 |
ispartof | Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews, 2016-01, Vol.60, p.98-114 |
issn | 0149-7634 1873-7528 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580549 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Deafness - epidemiology Functional Laterality Humans Prevalence |
title | Handedness prevalence in the deaf: Meta-analyses |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A38%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Handedness%20prevalence%20in%20the%20deaf:%20Meta-analyses&rft.jtitle=Neuroscience%20and%20biobehavioral%20reviews&rft.au=Papadatou-Pastou,%20Marietta&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=60&rft.spage=98&rft.epage=114&rft.pages=98-114&rft.issn=0149-7634&rft.eissn=1873-7528&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.11.013&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768580549%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c346t-fa70d124fca1238a1155d261c59828c17e74a4d51b79316431ef517a0d612c33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1760859440&rft_id=info:pmid/26631717&rfr_iscdi=true |