Loading…
Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California
This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwat...
Saved in:
Published in: | Ecological economics 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333 |
container_end_page | 11 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | Ecological economics |
container_volume | 121 |
creator | Gutrich, John J. Gigliello, Keith Gardner, Kimberly Vest Elmore, Andrew J. |
description | This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community.
•We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800915004371</els_id><sourcerecordid>1768580625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUM1KAzEQDqJgrb6C5OjBrclmN5u9KcU_ELyo15BmZ0vqblIzuy19Bl_alOpZmGFg5vthPkIuOZtxxuXNagY2dKn9LGe8TMsZy4sjMuGqEpnkTB6TCatzninG6lNyhrhijElZiwn5vk-80DtLIwxj9EhDS5cxjL7ZmgEi7Y03S-jBDxRHHIzzzi-p8TQZ4g4H6ClC3DgLe2aTIAm3XkdAdMHTxY6a7tN0jvZgmrClztPXLSSfD9N1sLum83RsQ_TOnJOT1nQIF79zSt4f7t_mT9nL6-Pz_O4ls0VZDVkOMpWouVQMStbwuqiUKIxQVqUPLc9rlctFWUNTmbbkoi1kUxeqYK1dKCHElFwddNcxfI2Ag-4dWug64yGMqHklVamYzMsElQeojQExQqvX0fUm7jRnep--Xum_9PU-_f0-pZ-ItwcipEc2DqJG68BbaFwEO-gmuP8kfgCYOpO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768580625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community.
•We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Alkali meadow ; Groundwater management ; Particulate matter ; Restoration costs ; Temporal loss of ecosystem service</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigliello, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community.
•We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Alkali meadow</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Restoration costs</subject><subject>Temporal loss of ecosystem service</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUM1KAzEQDqJgrb6C5OjBrclmN5u9KcU_ELyo15BmZ0vqblIzuy19Bl_alOpZmGFg5vthPkIuOZtxxuXNagY2dKn9LGe8TMsZy4sjMuGqEpnkTB6TCatzninG6lNyhrhijElZiwn5vk-80DtLIwxj9EhDS5cxjL7ZmgEi7Y03S-jBDxRHHIzzzi-p8TQZ4g4H6ClC3DgLe2aTIAm3XkdAdMHTxY6a7tN0jvZgmrClztPXLSSfD9N1sLum83RsQ_TOnJOT1nQIF79zSt4f7t_mT9nL6-Pz_O4ls0VZDVkOMpWouVQMStbwuqiUKIxQVqUPLc9rlctFWUNTmbbkoi1kUxeqYK1dKCHElFwddNcxfI2Ag-4dWug64yGMqHklVamYzMsElQeojQExQqvX0fUm7jRnep--Xum_9PU-_f0-pZ-ItwcipEc2DqJG68BbaFwEO-gmuP8kfgCYOpO0</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Gutrich, John J.</creator><creator>Gigliello, Keith</creator><creator>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creator><creator>Elmore, Andrew J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><author>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Alkali meadow</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Restoration costs</topic><topic>Temporal loss of ecosystem service</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigliello, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutrich, John J.</au><au>Gigliello, Keith</au><au>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</au><au>Elmore, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community.
•We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-8009 |
ispartof | Ecological economics, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11 |
issn | 0921-8009 1873-6106 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580625 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | Air quality Alkali meadow Groundwater management Particulate matter Restoration costs Temporal loss of ecosystem service |
title | Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20returns%20of%20groundwater%20management%20sustaining%20an%20ecosystem%20service%20of%20dust%20suppression%20by%20alkali%20meadow%20in%20Owens%20Valley,%20California&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Gutrich,%20John%20J.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768580625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768580625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |