Loading…

Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California

This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwat...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Ecological economics 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11
Main Authors: Gutrich, John J., Gigliello, Keith, Gardner, Kimberly Vest, Elmore, Andrew J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333
container_end_page 11
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Ecological economics
container_volume 121
creator Gutrich, John J.
Gigliello, Keith
Gardner, Kimberly Vest
Elmore, Andrew J.
description This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community. •We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580625</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0921800915004371</els_id><sourcerecordid>1768580625</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUM1KAzEQDqJgrb6C5OjBrclmN5u9KcU_ELyo15BmZ0vqblIzuy19Bl_alOpZmGFg5vthPkIuOZtxxuXNagY2dKn9LGe8TMsZy4sjMuGqEpnkTB6TCatzninG6lNyhrhijElZiwn5vk-80DtLIwxj9EhDS5cxjL7ZmgEi7Y03S-jBDxRHHIzzzi-p8TQZ4g4H6ClC3DgLe2aTIAm3XkdAdMHTxY6a7tN0jvZgmrClztPXLSSfD9N1sLum83RsQ_TOnJOT1nQIF79zSt4f7t_mT9nL6-Pz_O4ls0VZDVkOMpWouVQMStbwuqiUKIxQVqUPLc9rlctFWUNTmbbkoi1kUxeqYK1dKCHElFwddNcxfI2Ag-4dWug64yGMqHklVamYzMsElQeojQExQqvX0fUm7jRnep--Xum_9PU-_f0-pZ-ItwcipEc2DqJG68BbaFwEO-gmuP8kfgCYOpO0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1768580625</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community. •We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-8009</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6106</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Air quality ; Alkali meadow ; Groundwater management ; Particulate matter ; Restoration costs ; Temporal loss of ecosystem service</subject><ispartof>Ecological economics, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigliello, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><title>Ecological economics</title><description>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community. •We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</description><subject>Air quality</subject><subject>Alkali meadow</subject><subject>Groundwater management</subject><subject>Particulate matter</subject><subject>Restoration costs</subject><subject>Temporal loss of ecosystem service</subject><issn>0921-8009</issn><issn>1873-6106</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFUM1KAzEQDqJgrb6C5OjBrclmN5u9KcU_ELyo15BmZ0vqblIzuy19Bl_alOpZmGFg5vthPkIuOZtxxuXNagY2dKn9LGe8TMsZy4sjMuGqEpnkTB6TCatzninG6lNyhrhijElZiwn5vk-80DtLIwxj9EhDS5cxjL7ZmgEi7Y03S-jBDxRHHIzzzi-p8TQZ4g4H6ClC3DgLe2aTIAm3XkdAdMHTxY6a7tN0jvZgmrClztPXLSSfD9N1sLum83RsQ_TOnJOT1nQIF79zSt4f7t_mT9nL6-Pz_O4ls0VZDVkOMpWouVQMStbwuqiUKIxQVqUPLc9rlctFWUNTmbbkoi1kUxeqYK1dKCHElFwddNcxfI2Ag-4dWug64yGMqHklVamYzMsElQeojQExQqvX0fUm7jRnep--Xum_9PU-_f0-pZ-ItwcipEc2DqJG68BbaFwEO-gmuP8kfgCYOpO0</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Gutrich, John J.</creator><creator>Gigliello, Keith</creator><creator>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creator><creator>Elmore, Andrew J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</title><author>Gutrich, John J. ; Gigliello, Keith ; Gardner, Kimberly Vest ; Elmore, Andrew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Air quality</topic><topic>Alkali meadow</topic><topic>Groundwater management</topic><topic>Particulate matter</topic><topic>Restoration costs</topic><topic>Temporal loss of ecosystem service</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gutrich, John J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gigliello, Keith</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elmore, Andrew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gutrich, John J.</au><au>Gigliello, Keith</au><au>Gardner, Kimberly Vest</au><au>Elmore, Andrew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California</atitle><jtitle>Ecological economics</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>121</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>1-11</pages><issn>0921-8009</issn><eissn>1873-6106</eissn><abstract>This paper addresses the economic tradeoff between pumping groundwater and maintaining a native plant community that provides an ecosystem service of dust suppression. A dynamic ecological economic simulation model was created to assess net benefits of production (i.e., economic rent) from groundwater management while requiring a producer to maintain or restore native groundwater dependent vegetation in a well-field in Owens Valley, California. Historic groundwater withdrawal during dry conditions followed by recharge during wet conditions has reduced vegetation cover, soil stability and contributed to the drying of springs and seeps. Findings indicate adaptive management that pumps less water, but high volumes in wet years and low volumes in dry years, generates greater economic rent while supplying water, sustaining alkali meadow and maintaining dust suppression. Adaptive management generates economic rent of $82.6 million (in 2011 $) compared to status quo management of $30.5 million over 50years pumping less annual groundwater than status quo at respective levels of 73% (6830acre-ft; baseline conditions) and 56% (4952acre-ft; climate change scenario). Under a climate change scenario and a 2.0m root-zone or less, it would be cost effective to cease groundwater pumping rather than incur substantial restoration costs of the native plant community. •We model economics of groundwater management in a well-field in Owens Valley.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on alkali meadow communities.•We examine effects of groundwater management strategies on economic rent.•Adaptive groundwater management sustains native alkali meadow plant communities.•Adaptive water management generates more economic rent than status quo management.</abstract><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024</doi><tpages>11</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9237-5859</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-8009
ispartof Ecological economics, 2016-01, Vol.121, p.1-11
issn 0921-8009
1873-6106
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1768580625
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Air quality
Alkali meadow
Groundwater management
Particulate matter
Restoration costs
Temporal loss of ecosystem service
title Economic returns of groundwater management sustaining an ecosystem service of dust suppression by alkali meadow in Owens Valley, California
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T01%3A17%3A48IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20returns%20of%20groundwater%20management%20sustaining%20an%20ecosystem%20service%20of%20dust%20suppression%20by%20alkali%20meadow%20in%20Owens%20Valley,%20California&rft.jtitle=Ecological%20economics&rft.au=Gutrich,%20John%20J.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=121&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=1-11&rft.issn=0921-8009&rft.eissn=1873-6106&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.10.024&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1768580625%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c457t-2e62e6391680e50d1947834a38c8800c129826b59ed7af513f46d94840fcb8333%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1768580625&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true