Effect of Surgical Atrial Fibrillation Ablation at the Time of Cardiac Surgery on Risk of Postoperative Pacemaker Implantation

• Published in: The American journal of cardiology 2015-07, Vol.116 (1), p.88-91
• Main Authors: El-Chami, Mikhael F., MD, Binongo, José Nilo G., PhD, Levy, Mathew, BS, Merchant, Faisal M., MD, Halkos, Michael, MD, Thourani, Vinod, MD, Lattouf, Omar, MD, Guyton, Robert, MD, Puskas, John, MD, Leon, Angel R., MD
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Age; Aged; Aged, 80 and over; Atrial Fibrillation - epidemiology; Atrial Fibrillation - etiology; Atrial Fibrillation - surgery; Cardiac arrhythmia; Cardiac Pacing, Artificial - adverse effects; Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy - methods; Cardiology; Cardiovascular; Cardiovascular disease; Catheter Ablation; Confidence intervals; Coronary Artery Bypass; Coronary Artery Disease - complications; Diabetes; Female; Heart surgery; Humans; Hypertension; Logistics; Male; Middle Aged; Pacemaker, Artificial; Postoperative Care; Prevalence; Retrospective Studies; Risk Assessment; Risk Factors; Studies; Treatment Outcome; United States; Variables
• ISSN: 0002-9149; 1879-1913
• DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.03.046

The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate whether performing surgical atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation in conjunction with cardiac surgery (CS) increases the risk for postoperative permanent pacemaker (PPM) requirement. The 30-day risk for PPM requirement was analyzed in consecutive patients who underwent CS from January 2007 to August 27, 2013. Patients were divided into 3 groups: (1) those who underwent AF ablation concomitant with CS (AF ABL), (2) patients with any history of AF who underwent surgery who did not undergo ablation (AF NO ABL), and (3) those with no histories of AF who underwent surgery (NO AF). Logistic regression analysis was performed adjusting for age, gender, and surgery type. Of 13,453 CS patients, 353 (3%) were in the AF ABL group, 1,701 (12%) in the AF NO ABL group, and 11,399 (85%) in the NO AF group. A total of 7,651 patients (57%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting, 4,384 (33%) underwent valve surgery, and 1,418 (10%) underwent coronary artery bypass grafting and valve surgery. The overall PPM risk was 1.6% (212 of 13,453); risk was 5.7% (20 of 353) in the AF ABL group, 3.1% (53 of 1,701) in the AF NO ABL group, and 1.2% (139 of 11,399) in the NO AF group. The unadjusted and adjusted odds of PPM were higher in the AF ABL and AF NO ABL groups than in the NO AF group (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.7 to 4.4, and adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.2 to 2.4, respectively). The unadjusted OR comparing the AF ABL group and the AF NO ABL group was significant (unadjusted OR 1.9, 95% CI 1.9 to 3.2); however, the OR adjusted for surgery type, age, and gender showed a trend toward significance (adjusted OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.9 to 2.7). In conclusion, in this large cohort of patients who underwent CS, surgical AF ablation appeared to carry an increased risk for postoperative PPM implantation.