Loading…
Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing
Prescribed fire can release herbaceous forages from woody plant competition thus promoting increased forage plant production, vigor, and accessibility. Prescribe fire also consumes standing litter thereby improving forage quality and palatability. Consequently, prescribed fire is commonly considered...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of arid environments 2016-01, Vol.124, p.398-412 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413 |
container_end_page | 412 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 398 |
container_title | Journal of arid environments |
container_volume | 124 |
creator | Clark, Patrick E. Lee, Jaechoul Ko, Kyungduk Nielson, Ryan M. Johnson, Douglas E. Ganskopp, David C. Pierson, Fredrick B. Hardegree, Stuart P. |
description | Prescribed fire can release herbaceous forages from woody plant competition thus promoting increased forage plant production, vigor, and accessibility. Prescribe fire also consumes standing litter thereby improving forage quality and palatability. Consequently, prescribed fire is commonly considered an effective tool for manipulating livestock distribution on rangelands. Efficacy of this tool on mesic sagebrush steppe, however, has received little research attention. Beginning in 2001, resource selection by beef cows under a mid-summer (July) grazing regime was evaluated using global positioning system (GPS) collars for 2 years prior to and for up to 5 years after a fall prescribed fire was conducted on mesic sagebrush steppe in the Owyhee Mountains of southwestern Idaho, USA. Cattle selected for burned areas during the first, second, and fifth postfire years. Cattle had exhibited neutral selectivity towards these areas, during one of the two prefire years. Burning in the uplands reduced cattle use of near-stream habitats but only during the second postfire year. Differences in phenological timing of grazing may account for differences in cattle response to burning noted between this study and one conducted nearby under a spring (May) grazing regime. This is a case study and caution should be taken in extrapolating these results.
•Beef cows were tracked with GPS for 2 yrs prefire and up to 5 yrs postfire on sagebrush steppe.•A resource selection function accurately predicted prefire and postfire cattle use.•Elevation, slope, NDVI standard deviation, and distance to upland water sources were the primary drivers of prefire cattle use.•Prefire cattle selectivity was neutral towards areas later burned.•Cattle selected for burned areas during 3 of the 4 postfire years evaluated. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.03.005 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770294792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0140196315000713</els_id><sourcerecordid>1770294792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxa0KpC4tXwH5yCVhxomdhBOoolCpqD2AxM2yJ-PFq_xZ7KRS-fSkWjiX00hv3nvSzE-INwglApp3h_LgUux5eigVoC6hKgH0mdghdLrolPrxQuwAayiwM9W5eJXzAQBR62onxvvEmVL03MsQE0sOgWnJcp7ktpnXRCwzD5sWN8k_SnLLMrCMkxw5R5LZ7dmnNf-UeeHjkUt579Ii1Xv5NfZFXseRk9wn9ztO-0vxMrgh8-u_80J8v_707epLcXv3-ebq421BVdMuRUvGNy3VyjB2qNAbHYIGTX1NVfDUGW-UQgWklMfWO6q1C64xuiXtaqwuxNtT7zHNv1bOix1jJh4GN_G8ZotNA6qrm079h7VSraqhhc1qTlZKc86Jgz2mOLr0aBHsEwp7sP9Q2CcUFiq7odiCH05B3m5-iJxspsgTcb99nBbbz_G5ij-wbZYb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1732824080</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Clark, Patrick E. ; Lee, Jaechoul ; Ko, Kyungduk ; Nielson, Ryan M. ; Johnson, Douglas E. ; Ganskopp, David C. ; Pierson, Fredrick B. ; Hardegree, Stuart P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clark, Patrick E. ; Lee, Jaechoul ; Ko, Kyungduk ; Nielson, Ryan M. ; Johnson, Douglas E. ; Ganskopp, David C. ; Pierson, Fredrick B. ; Hardegree, Stuart P.</creatorcontrib><description>Prescribed fire can release herbaceous forages from woody plant competition thus promoting increased forage plant production, vigor, and accessibility. Prescribe fire also consumes standing litter thereby improving forage quality and palatability. Consequently, prescribed fire is commonly considered an effective tool for manipulating livestock distribution on rangelands. Efficacy of this tool on mesic sagebrush steppe, however, has received little research attention. Beginning in 2001, resource selection by beef cows under a mid-summer (July) grazing regime was evaluated using global positioning system (GPS) collars for 2 years prior to and for up to 5 years after a fall prescribed fire was conducted on mesic sagebrush steppe in the Owyhee Mountains of southwestern Idaho, USA. Cattle selected for burned areas during the first, second, and fifth postfire years. Cattle had exhibited neutral selectivity towards these areas, during one of the two prefire years. Burning in the uplands reduced cattle use of near-stream habitats but only during the second postfire year. Differences in phenological timing of grazing may account for differences in cattle response to burning noted between this study and one conducted nearby under a spring (May) grazing regime. This is a case study and caution should be taken in extrapolating these results.
•Beef cows were tracked with GPS for 2 yrs prefire and up to 5 yrs postfire on sagebrush steppe.•A resource selection function accurately predicted prefire and postfire cattle use.•Elevation, slope, NDVI standard deviation, and distance to upland water sources were the primary drivers of prefire cattle use.•Prefire cattle selectivity was neutral towards areas later burned.•Cattle selected for burned areas during 3 of the 4 postfire years evaluated.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0140-1963</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-922X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.03.005</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Burning ; Cattle ; Combustion ; Fires ; Forages ; Global Positioning System ; GPS tracking ; Grazing ; Livestock distribution ; Modeling ; Rangeland improvement ; Riparian use ; Steppes</subject><ispartof>Journal of arid environments, 2016-01, Vol.124, p.398-412</ispartof><rights>2015</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clark, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaechoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyungduk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielson, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Douglas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganskopp, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Fredrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardegree, Stuart P.</creatorcontrib><title>Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing</title><title>Journal of arid environments</title><description>Prescribed fire can release herbaceous forages from woody plant competition thus promoting increased forage plant production, vigor, and accessibility. Prescribe fire also consumes standing litter thereby improving forage quality and palatability. Consequently, prescribed fire is commonly considered an effective tool for manipulating livestock distribution on rangelands. Efficacy of this tool on mesic sagebrush steppe, however, has received little research attention. Beginning in 2001, resource selection by beef cows under a mid-summer (July) grazing regime was evaluated using global positioning system (GPS) collars for 2 years prior to and for up to 5 years after a fall prescribed fire was conducted on mesic sagebrush steppe in the Owyhee Mountains of southwestern Idaho, USA. Cattle selected for burned areas during the first, second, and fifth postfire years. Cattle had exhibited neutral selectivity towards these areas, during one of the two prefire years. Burning in the uplands reduced cattle use of near-stream habitats but only during the second postfire year. Differences in phenological timing of grazing may account for differences in cattle response to burning noted between this study and one conducted nearby under a spring (May) grazing regime. This is a case study and caution should be taken in extrapolating these results.
•Beef cows were tracked with GPS for 2 yrs prefire and up to 5 yrs postfire on sagebrush steppe.•A resource selection function accurately predicted prefire and postfire cattle use.•Elevation, slope, NDVI standard deviation, and distance to upland water sources were the primary drivers of prefire cattle use.•Prefire cattle selectivity was neutral towards areas later burned.•Cattle selected for burned areas during 3 of the 4 postfire years evaluated.</description><subject>Burning</subject><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Combustion</subject><subject>Fires</subject><subject>Forages</subject><subject>Global Positioning System</subject><subject>GPS tracking</subject><subject>Grazing</subject><subject>Livestock distribution</subject><subject>Modeling</subject><subject>Rangeland improvement</subject><subject>Riparian use</subject><subject>Steppes</subject><issn>0140-1963</issn><issn>1095-922X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkU9v1DAQxa0KpC4tXwH5yCVhxomdhBOoolCpqD2AxM2yJ-PFq_xZ7KRS-fSkWjiX00hv3nvSzE-INwglApp3h_LgUux5eigVoC6hKgH0mdghdLrolPrxQuwAayiwM9W5eJXzAQBR62onxvvEmVL03MsQE0sOgWnJcp7ktpnXRCwzD5sWN8k_SnLLMrCMkxw5R5LZ7dmnNf-UeeHjkUt579Ii1Xv5NfZFXseRk9wn9ztO-0vxMrgh8-u_80J8v_707epLcXv3-ebq421BVdMuRUvGNy3VyjB2qNAbHYIGTX1NVfDUGW-UQgWklMfWO6q1C64xuiXtaqwuxNtT7zHNv1bOix1jJh4GN_G8ZotNA6qrm079h7VSraqhhc1qTlZKc86Jgz2mOLr0aBHsEwp7sP9Q2CcUFiq7odiCH05B3m5-iJxspsgTcb99nBbbz_G5ij-wbZYb</recordid><startdate>201601</startdate><enddate>201601</enddate><creator>Clark, Patrick E.</creator><creator>Lee, Jaechoul</creator><creator>Ko, Kyungduk</creator><creator>Nielson, Ryan M.</creator><creator>Johnson, Douglas E.</creator><creator>Ganskopp, David C.</creator><creator>Pierson, Fredrick B.</creator><creator>Hardegree, Stuart P.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201601</creationdate><title>Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing</title><author>Clark, Patrick E. ; Lee, Jaechoul ; Ko, Kyungduk ; Nielson, Ryan M. ; Johnson, Douglas E. ; Ganskopp, David C. ; Pierson, Fredrick B. ; Hardegree, Stuart P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Burning</topic><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Combustion</topic><topic>Fires</topic><topic>Forages</topic><topic>Global Positioning System</topic><topic>GPS tracking</topic><topic>Grazing</topic><topic>Livestock distribution</topic><topic>Modeling</topic><topic>Rangeland improvement</topic><topic>Riparian use</topic><topic>Steppes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clark, Patrick E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Jaechoul</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ko, Kyungduk</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nielson, Ryan M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Johnson, Douglas E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ganskopp, David C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pierson, Fredrick B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hardegree, Stuart P.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clark, Patrick E.</au><au>Lee, Jaechoul</au><au>Ko, Kyungduk</au><au>Nielson, Ryan M.</au><au>Johnson, Douglas E.</au><au>Ganskopp, David C.</au><au>Pierson, Fredrick B.</au><au>Hardegree, Stuart P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing</atitle><jtitle>Journal of arid environments</jtitle><date>2016-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>124</volume><spage>398</spage><epage>412</epage><pages>398-412</pages><issn>0140-1963</issn><eissn>1095-922X</eissn><abstract>Prescribed fire can release herbaceous forages from woody plant competition thus promoting increased forage plant production, vigor, and accessibility. Prescribe fire also consumes standing litter thereby improving forage quality and palatability. Consequently, prescribed fire is commonly considered an effective tool for manipulating livestock distribution on rangelands. Efficacy of this tool on mesic sagebrush steppe, however, has received little research attention. Beginning in 2001, resource selection by beef cows under a mid-summer (July) grazing regime was evaluated using global positioning system (GPS) collars for 2 years prior to and for up to 5 years after a fall prescribed fire was conducted on mesic sagebrush steppe in the Owyhee Mountains of southwestern Idaho, USA. Cattle selected for burned areas during the first, second, and fifth postfire years. Cattle had exhibited neutral selectivity towards these areas, during one of the two prefire years. Burning in the uplands reduced cattle use of near-stream habitats but only during the second postfire year. Differences in phenological timing of grazing may account for differences in cattle response to burning noted between this study and one conducted nearby under a spring (May) grazing regime. This is a case study and caution should be taken in extrapolating these results.
•Beef cows were tracked with GPS for 2 yrs prefire and up to 5 yrs postfire on sagebrush steppe.•A resource selection function accurately predicted prefire and postfire cattle use.•Elevation, slope, NDVI standard deviation, and distance to upland water sources were the primary drivers of prefire cattle use.•Prefire cattle selectivity was neutral towards areas later burned.•Cattle selected for burned areas during 3 of the 4 postfire years evaluated.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.03.005</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0140-1963 |
ispartof | Journal of arid environments, 2016-01, Vol.124, p.398-412 |
issn | 0140-1963 1095-922X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770294792 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Burning Cattle Combustion Fires Forages Global Positioning System GPS tracking Grazing Livestock distribution Modeling Rangeland improvement Riparian use Steppes |
title | Prescribed fire effects on resource selection by cattle in mesic sagebrush steppe. Part 2: Mid-summer grazing |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T00%3A14%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Prescribed%20fire%20effects%20on%20resource%20selection%20by%20cattle%20in%20mesic%20sagebrush%20steppe.%20Part%202:%20Mid-summer%20grazing&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20arid%20environments&rft.au=Clark,%20Patrick%20E.&rft.date=2016-01&rft.volume=124&rft.spage=398&rft.epage=412&rft.pages=398-412&rft.issn=0140-1963&rft.eissn=1095-922X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2015.03.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1770294792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c378t-8c6b78c426e19121b65ff505cd4c3fbc96b622120c22b18bac45afa7658c5a413%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1732824080&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |