Loading…
A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes
Recycled water provides a viable opportunity to supplement water supplies as well as alleviate environmental loads. To further expand current schemes and explore new recycled water end uses, this study reviews several environmental assessment tools, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Fl...
Saved in:
Published in: | The Science of the total environment 2012-06, Vol.426, p.13-31 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23 |
container_end_page | 31 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 13 |
container_title | The Science of the total environment |
container_volume | 426 |
creator | Chen, Zhuo Ngo, Huu Hao Guo, Wenshan |
description | Recycled water provides a viable opportunity to supplement water supplies as well as alleviate environmental loads. To further expand current schemes and explore new recycled water end uses, this study reviews several environmental assessment tools, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) in terms of their types, characteristics and weaknesses in evaluating the sustainability of recycled water schemes. Due to the limitations in individual models, the integrated approaches are recommended in most cases, of which the outputs could be further combined with additional economic and social assessments in multi-criteria decision making framework. The study also proposes several management strategies in improving the environmental scores. The discussion and suggestions could help decision makers in making a sound judgement as well as recognising the challenges and tasks in the future.
► Review of three environmental assessment tools in recycled water assessment ► Recommendation of integrated assessment approaches in sustainable development ► Construction of a multi-criteria decision making framework ► Proposal of management strategies in improving environmental scores |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770303266</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0048969712004160</els_id><sourcerecordid>1020850614</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0U1vEzEQgGELgWha-At0L0hcdhnb6489RlWhSJU4QM-W450FR_tRPE6r_HscJS3H4osvz3gsvYxdcmg4cP1521CIeck4PzQCuGhANqDUK7bi1nQ1B6FfsxVAa-tOd-aMnRNtoRxj-Vt2JoQSnGu5YjfrKqSYY_BjlfAh4mO1zBXtKPs4-00cY95XngiJJpxztQyFhX0Ysa8efcZUUfiNE9I79mbwI-H7033B7r5c_7y6qW-_f_12tb6tg1Im1yi1FsJwgxrCZuiNsNIEjlYPVulWC2461QGGFm2_8dpb7fteKdErIRGFvGCfju_ep-XPDim7KVLAcfQzLjty3BiQIIXWL1MQYBVo3v4H5dIoLbks1BxpSAtRwsHdpzj5tC_o4LTbuuc47hDHgXQlTpn8cFqy20zYP8891Sjg4wl4KkGG5OcQ6Z9TtmsNt8VdHt3gF-d_pWLufpRNLZT1rVJdEeujwJKiVE2HL-EcsI8lX3b9El_87l_Unbmn</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1013756313</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Chen, Zhuo ; Ngo, Huu Hao ; Guo, Wenshan</creator><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhuo ; Ngo, Huu Hao ; Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><description>Recycled water provides a viable opportunity to supplement water supplies as well as alleviate environmental loads. To further expand current schemes and explore new recycled water end uses, this study reviews several environmental assessment tools, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) in terms of their types, characteristics and weaknesses in evaluating the sustainability of recycled water schemes. Due to the limitations in individual models, the integrated approaches are recommended in most cases, of which the outputs could be further combined with additional economic and social assessments in multi-criteria decision making framework. The study also proposes several management strategies in improving the environmental scores. The discussion and suggestions could help decision makers in making a sound judgement as well as recognising the challenges and tasks in the future.
► Review of three environmental assessment tools in recycled water assessment ► Recommendation of integrated assessment approaches in sustainable development ► Construction of a multi-criteria decision making framework ► Proposal of management strategies in improving environmental scores</description><identifier>ISSN: 0048-9697</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-1026</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22521163</identifier><identifier>CODEN: STENDL</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Assessments ; Conservation of Natural Resources - methods ; Decision making ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Ecological risk assessment ; Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics ; environmental assessment ; Environmental assessment tools ; Exact sciences and technology ; Hydrology. Hydrogeology ; Integrated approaches ; Life cycle assessment ; Life cycle engineering ; material flow analysis ; multi-criteria decision making ; Multi-criteria decision making framework ; Pollution ; Pollution, environment geology ; Recycled ; Recycled water ; Risk Assessment ; Strategy ; Sustainability ; Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods ; Water Purification - methods ; Water resources ; water reuse ; water supply ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water Supply - statistics & numerical data ; Water treatment and pollution ; water use</subject><ispartof>The Science of the total environment, 2012-06, Vol.426, p.13-31</ispartof><rights>2012 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=25894718$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22521163$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><title>A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes</title><title>The Science of the total environment</title><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><description>Recycled water provides a viable opportunity to supplement water supplies as well as alleviate environmental loads. To further expand current schemes and explore new recycled water end uses, this study reviews several environmental assessment tools, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) in terms of their types, characteristics and weaknesses in evaluating the sustainability of recycled water schemes. Due to the limitations in individual models, the integrated approaches are recommended in most cases, of which the outputs could be further combined with additional economic and social assessments in multi-criteria decision making framework. The study also proposes several management strategies in improving the environmental scores. The discussion and suggestions could help decision makers in making a sound judgement as well as recognising the challenges and tasks in the future.
► Review of three environmental assessment tools in recycled water assessment ► Recommendation of integrated assessment approaches in sustainable development ► Construction of a multi-criteria decision making framework ► Proposal of management strategies in improving environmental scores</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Ecological risk assessment</subject><subject>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</subject><subject>environmental assessment</subject><subject>Environmental assessment tools</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</subject><subject>Integrated approaches</subject><subject>Life cycle assessment</subject><subject>Life cycle engineering</subject><subject>material flow analysis</subject><subject>multi-criteria decision making</subject><subject>Multi-criteria decision making framework</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution, environment geology</subject><subject>Recycled</subject><subject>Recycled water</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Strategy</subject><subject>Sustainability</subject><subject>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</subject><subject>Water Purification - methods</subject><subject>Water resources</subject><subject>water reuse</subject><subject>water supply</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - statistics & numerical data</subject><subject>Water treatment and pollution</subject><subject>water use</subject><issn>0048-9697</issn><issn>1879-1026</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0U1vEzEQgGELgWha-At0L0hcdhnb6489RlWhSJU4QM-W450FR_tRPE6r_HscJS3H4osvz3gsvYxdcmg4cP1521CIeck4PzQCuGhANqDUK7bi1nQ1B6FfsxVAa-tOd-aMnRNtoRxj-Vt2JoQSnGu5YjfrKqSYY_BjlfAh4mO1zBXtKPs4-00cY95XngiJJpxztQyFhX0Ysa8efcZUUfiNE9I79mbwI-H7033B7r5c_7y6qW-_f_12tb6tg1Im1yi1FsJwgxrCZuiNsNIEjlYPVulWC2461QGGFm2_8dpb7fteKdErIRGFvGCfju_ep-XPDim7KVLAcfQzLjty3BiQIIXWL1MQYBVo3v4H5dIoLbks1BxpSAtRwsHdpzj5tC_o4LTbuuc47hDHgXQlTpn8cFqy20zYP8891Sjg4wl4KkGG5OcQ6Z9TtmsNt8VdHt3gF-d_pWLufpRNLZT1rVJdEeujwJKiVE2HL-EcsI8lX3b9El_87l_Unbmn</recordid><startdate>20120601</startdate><enddate>20120601</enddate><creator>Chen, Zhuo</creator><creator>Ngo, Huu Hao</creator><creator>Guo, Wenshan</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U1</scope><scope>7U2</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120601</creationdate><title>A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes</title><author>Chen, Zhuo ; Ngo, Huu Hao ; Guo, Wenshan</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources - methods</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Ecological risk assessment</topic><topic>Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics</topic><topic>environmental assessment</topic><topic>Environmental assessment tools</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Hydrology. Hydrogeology</topic><topic>Integrated approaches</topic><topic>Life cycle assessment</topic><topic>Life cycle engineering</topic><topic>material flow analysis</topic><topic>multi-criteria decision making</topic><topic>Multi-criteria decision making framework</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution, environment geology</topic><topic>Recycled</topic><topic>Recycled water</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Strategy</topic><topic>Sustainability</topic><topic>Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods</topic><topic>Water Purification - methods</topic><topic>Water resources</topic><topic>water reuse</topic><topic>water supply</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - statistics & numerical data</topic><topic>Water treatment and pollution</topic><topic>water use</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Zhuo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ngo, Huu Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Wenshan</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Risk Abstracts</collection><collection>Safety Science and Risk</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Zhuo</au><au>Ngo, Huu Hao</au><au>Guo, Wenshan</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes</atitle><jtitle>The Science of the total environment</jtitle><addtitle>Sci Total Environ</addtitle><date>2012-06-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>426</volume><spage>13</spage><epage>31</epage><pages>13-31</pages><issn>0048-9697</issn><eissn>1879-1026</eissn><coden>STENDL</coden><abstract>Recycled water provides a viable opportunity to supplement water supplies as well as alleviate environmental loads. To further expand current schemes and explore new recycled water end uses, this study reviews several environmental assessment tools, including Life Cycle Assessment (LCA), Material Flow Analysis (MFA) and Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) in terms of their types, characteristics and weaknesses in evaluating the sustainability of recycled water schemes. Due to the limitations in individual models, the integrated approaches are recommended in most cases, of which the outputs could be further combined with additional economic and social assessments in multi-criteria decision making framework. The study also proposes several management strategies in improving the environmental scores. The discussion and suggestions could help decision makers in making a sound judgement as well as recognising the challenges and tasks in the future.
► Review of three environmental assessment tools in recycled water assessment ► Recommendation of integrated assessment approaches in sustainable development ► Construction of a multi-criteria decision making framework ► Proposal of management strategies in improving environmental scores</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>22521163</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0048-9697 |
ispartof | The Science of the total environment, 2012-06, Vol.426, p.13-31 |
issn | 0048-9697 1879-1026 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770303266 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Applied sciences Assessments Conservation of Natural Resources - methods Decision making Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Ecological risk assessment Engineering and environment geology. Geothermics environmental assessment Environmental assessment tools Exact sciences and technology Hydrology. Hydrogeology Integrated approaches Life cycle assessment Life cycle engineering material flow analysis multi-criteria decision making Multi-criteria decision making framework Pollution Pollution, environment geology Recycled Recycled water Risk Assessment Strategy Sustainability Waste Disposal, Fluid - methods Water Purification - methods Water resources water reuse water supply Water Supply - analysis Water Supply - statistics & numerical data Water treatment and pollution water use |
title | A critical review on sustainability assessment of recycled water schemes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-23T19%3A02%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20critical%20review%20on%20sustainability%20assessment%20of%20recycled%20water%20schemes&rft.jtitle=The%20Science%20of%20the%20total%20environment&rft.au=Chen,%20Zhuo&rft.date=2012-06-01&rft.volume=426&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=31&rft.pages=13-31&rft.issn=0048-9697&rft.eissn=1879-1026&rft.coden=STENDL&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.03.055&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1020850614%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c557t-e36622717e60cbfd72837c1e86f856462179590ec4e8dba6a86add552d523ee23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1013756313&rft_id=info:pmid/22521163&rfr_iscdi=true |