Loading…

Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels

► We study the territorial cohesion impacts of a HSR extension at different planning levels. ► We use accessibility measures to address territorial cohesion impacts. ► The direction and intensity of cohesion impacts are different depending on the planning level considered. ► Cohesion results are exp...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of transport geography 2012-09, Vol.24, p.130-141
Main Authors: Ortega, Emilio, López, Elena, Monzón, Andrés
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693
container_end_page 141
container_issue
container_start_page 130
container_title Journal of transport geography
container_volume 24
creator Ortega, Emilio
López, Elena
Monzón, Andrés
description ► We study the territorial cohesion impacts of a HSR extension at different planning levels. ► We use accessibility measures to address territorial cohesion impacts. ► The direction and intensity of cohesion impacts are different depending on the planning level considered. ► Cohesion results are explained mainly by the combination of population density distribution and location of HSR stations. ► Accessibility relative starting situation and quality of the access to the HSR network also drive the cohesion results. The assessment of the impacts of high-speed rail (HSR) projects on territorial cohesion has recently emerged as an important issue for transport planners. HSR networks are usually designed to interconnect strong economic centers efficiently. Hence, the greatest improvements in accessibility concentrate near HSR stations, whereas intermediate locations suffer from comparatively lower accessibility benefits. Negative territorial cohesion impacts appear if HSR ultimately results in a more polarized spatial distribution of accessibility levels. There has so far been little research aimed at exploring the implications of the definition of the geographical limits of study area in the measurement of HSR territorial cohesion impacts. In this context, this paper presents a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based methodology which analyzes changes in the territorial distribution of accessibility resulting from HSR investments. These changes are analyzed at different planning levels, in order to assess the sensitivity of territorial cohesion results to scale definition. The methodology is tested by its application to the development of the 670km of the Galician (north-western) HSR corridor included in the Spanish PEIT (Strategic Transport and Infrastructure Plan) 2005–2020. Cohesion impacts are assessed at different direct planning levels: regional, corridor and national levels, as well from the perspective of spillover effects. In all cases, the construction of the HSR corridor increases the accessibility values, and results show positive cohesion effects at the national and corridor levels, whereas at the regional level both balancing and polarization effects appear. These differences are mainly due to the location of HSR stations or to the quality of the transport network from the surrounding cities to the station, which determines the territorial distribution of accessibility improvements. Similar results are found from the spillover perspective.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770328853</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0966692311001591</els_id><sourcerecordid>1365120727</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKt_QbJ0MzUvmSaTnVL8goKbug5p5k2bYToZk7Tgv3dKdd3Vg8u5l8ch5B7YDBjIx3bW5mj7DYYZZwBjOGOsuiATqJQogAt5SSZMS1lIzcU1uUmpZQwUMD4hyxXG6HOI3nbUhS0mH3rqd4N1OdHQ0K3fbIs0INY0Wt9Rm2ntmwYj9pkOne17329ohwfs0i25amyX8O7vTsnX68tq8V4sP98-Fs_LwpVlmYtSa1iDrtVaIzLgWlSVFKVrnJXg1lyXDB3nwoITFqt6bpUUtlYlY650UospeTjtDjF87zFls_PJYTd-g2GfDCjFBK-quTiPCjkHzhRXIypPqIshpYiNGaLf2fhjgJmjadOaf9PmaPqYj6bH4tOpOCrAg8dokvPYO6x9RJdNHfy5iV8TrYp3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1365120727</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Ortega, Emilio ; López, Elena ; Monzón, Andrés</creator><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Emilio ; López, Elena ; Monzón, Andrés</creatorcontrib><description>► We study the territorial cohesion impacts of a HSR extension at different planning levels. ► We use accessibility measures to address territorial cohesion impacts. ► The direction and intensity of cohesion impacts are different depending on the planning level considered. ► Cohesion results are explained mainly by the combination of population density distribution and location of HSR stations. ► Accessibility relative starting situation and quality of the access to the HSR network also drive the cohesion results. The assessment of the impacts of high-speed rail (HSR) projects on territorial cohesion has recently emerged as an important issue for transport planners. HSR networks are usually designed to interconnect strong economic centers efficiently. Hence, the greatest improvements in accessibility concentrate near HSR stations, whereas intermediate locations suffer from comparatively lower accessibility benefits. Negative territorial cohesion impacts appear if HSR ultimately results in a more polarized spatial distribution of accessibility levels. There has so far been little research aimed at exploring the implications of the definition of the geographical limits of study area in the measurement of HSR territorial cohesion impacts. In this context, this paper presents a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based methodology which analyzes changes in the territorial distribution of accessibility resulting from HSR investments. These changes are analyzed at different planning levels, in order to assess the sensitivity of territorial cohesion results to scale definition. The methodology is tested by its application to the development of the 670km of the Galician (north-western) HSR corridor included in the Spanish PEIT (Strategic Transport and Infrastructure Plan) 2005–2020. Cohesion impacts are assessed at different direct planning levels: regional, corridor and national levels, as well from the perspective of spillover effects. In all cases, the construction of the HSR corridor increases the accessibility values, and results show positive cohesion effects at the national and corridor levels, whereas at the regional level both balancing and polarization effects appear. These differences are mainly due to the location of HSR stations or to the quality of the transport network from the surrounding cities to the station, which determines the territorial distribution of accessibility improvements. Similar results are found from the spillover perspective.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-6923</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-1236</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Accessibility ; Accessibility indicators ; Cohesion ; Geography ; High speed ; High speed rail (HSR) ; Planning levels ; Rails ; Spatial distribution ; Stations ; Territorial cohesion effects ; Transport</subject><ispartof>Journal of transport geography, 2012-09, Vol.24, p.130-141</ispartof><rights>2011 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Andrés</creatorcontrib><title>Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels</title><title>Journal of transport geography</title><description>► We study the territorial cohesion impacts of a HSR extension at different planning levels. ► We use accessibility measures to address territorial cohesion impacts. ► The direction and intensity of cohesion impacts are different depending on the planning level considered. ► Cohesion results are explained mainly by the combination of population density distribution and location of HSR stations. ► Accessibility relative starting situation and quality of the access to the HSR network also drive the cohesion results. The assessment of the impacts of high-speed rail (HSR) projects on territorial cohesion has recently emerged as an important issue for transport planners. HSR networks are usually designed to interconnect strong economic centers efficiently. Hence, the greatest improvements in accessibility concentrate near HSR stations, whereas intermediate locations suffer from comparatively lower accessibility benefits. Negative territorial cohesion impacts appear if HSR ultimately results in a more polarized spatial distribution of accessibility levels. There has so far been little research aimed at exploring the implications of the definition of the geographical limits of study area in the measurement of HSR territorial cohesion impacts. In this context, this paper presents a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based methodology which analyzes changes in the territorial distribution of accessibility resulting from HSR investments. These changes are analyzed at different planning levels, in order to assess the sensitivity of territorial cohesion results to scale definition. The methodology is tested by its application to the development of the 670km of the Galician (north-western) HSR corridor included in the Spanish PEIT (Strategic Transport and Infrastructure Plan) 2005–2020. Cohesion impacts are assessed at different direct planning levels: regional, corridor and national levels, as well from the perspective of spillover effects. In all cases, the construction of the HSR corridor increases the accessibility values, and results show positive cohesion effects at the national and corridor levels, whereas at the regional level both balancing and polarization effects appear. These differences are mainly due to the location of HSR stations or to the quality of the transport network from the surrounding cities to the station, which determines the territorial distribution of accessibility improvements. Similar results are found from the spillover perspective.</description><subject>Accessibility</subject><subject>Accessibility indicators</subject><subject>Cohesion</subject><subject>Geography</subject><subject>High speed</subject><subject>High speed rail (HSR)</subject><subject>Planning levels</subject><subject>Rails</subject><subject>Spatial distribution</subject><subject>Stations</subject><subject>Territorial cohesion effects</subject><subject>Transport</subject><issn>0966-6923</issn><issn>1873-1236</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEURYMoWKt_QbJ0MzUvmSaTnVL8goKbug5p5k2bYToZk7Tgv3dKdd3Vg8u5l8ch5B7YDBjIx3bW5mj7DYYZZwBjOGOsuiATqJQogAt5SSZMS1lIzcU1uUmpZQwUMD4hyxXG6HOI3nbUhS0mH3rqd4N1OdHQ0K3fbIs0INY0Wt9Rm2ntmwYj9pkOne17329ohwfs0i25amyX8O7vTsnX68tq8V4sP98-Fs_LwpVlmYtSa1iDrtVaIzLgWlSVFKVrnJXg1lyXDB3nwoITFqt6bpUUtlYlY650UospeTjtDjF87zFls_PJYTd-g2GfDCjFBK-quTiPCjkHzhRXIypPqIshpYiNGaLf2fhjgJmjadOaf9PmaPqYj6bH4tOpOCrAg8dokvPYO6x9RJdNHfy5iV8TrYp3</recordid><startdate>201209</startdate><enddate>201209</enddate><creator>Ortega, Emilio</creator><creator>López, Elena</creator><creator>Monzón, Andrés</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201209</creationdate><title>Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels</title><author>Ortega, Emilio ; López, Elena ; Monzón, Andrés</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>Accessibility</topic><topic>Accessibility indicators</topic><topic>Cohesion</topic><topic>Geography</topic><topic>High speed</topic><topic>High speed rail (HSR)</topic><topic>Planning levels</topic><topic>Rails</topic><topic>Spatial distribution</topic><topic>Stations</topic><topic>Territorial cohesion effects</topic><topic>Transport</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ortega, Emilio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>López, Elena</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Monzón, Andrés</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Journal of transport geography</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ortega, Emilio</au><au>López, Elena</au><au>Monzón, Andrés</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels</atitle><jtitle>Journal of transport geography</jtitle><date>2012-09</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>24</volume><spage>130</spage><epage>141</epage><pages>130-141</pages><issn>0966-6923</issn><eissn>1873-1236</eissn><abstract>► We study the territorial cohesion impacts of a HSR extension at different planning levels. ► We use accessibility measures to address territorial cohesion impacts. ► The direction and intensity of cohesion impacts are different depending on the planning level considered. ► Cohesion results are explained mainly by the combination of population density distribution and location of HSR stations. ► Accessibility relative starting situation and quality of the access to the HSR network also drive the cohesion results. The assessment of the impacts of high-speed rail (HSR) projects on territorial cohesion has recently emerged as an important issue for transport planners. HSR networks are usually designed to interconnect strong economic centers efficiently. Hence, the greatest improvements in accessibility concentrate near HSR stations, whereas intermediate locations suffer from comparatively lower accessibility benefits. Negative territorial cohesion impacts appear if HSR ultimately results in a more polarized spatial distribution of accessibility levels. There has so far been little research aimed at exploring the implications of the definition of the geographical limits of study area in the measurement of HSR territorial cohesion impacts. In this context, this paper presents a Geographical Information System (GIS)-based methodology which analyzes changes in the territorial distribution of accessibility resulting from HSR investments. These changes are analyzed at different planning levels, in order to assess the sensitivity of territorial cohesion results to scale definition. The methodology is tested by its application to the development of the 670km of the Galician (north-western) HSR corridor included in the Spanish PEIT (Strategic Transport and Infrastructure Plan) 2005–2020. Cohesion impacts are assessed at different direct planning levels: regional, corridor and national levels, as well from the perspective of spillover effects. In all cases, the construction of the HSR corridor increases the accessibility values, and results show positive cohesion effects at the national and corridor levels, whereas at the regional level both balancing and polarization effects appear. These differences are mainly due to the location of HSR stations or to the quality of the transport network from the surrounding cities to the station, which determines the territorial distribution of accessibility improvements. Similar results are found from the spillover perspective.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-6923
ispartof Journal of transport geography, 2012-09, Vol.24, p.130-141
issn 0966-6923
1873-1236
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770328853
source ScienceDirect Freedom Collection
subjects Accessibility
Accessibility indicators
Cohesion
Geography
High speed
High speed rail (HSR)
Planning levels
Rails
Spatial distribution
Stations
Territorial cohesion effects
Transport
title Territorial cohesion impacts of high-speed rail at different planning levels
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T22%3A02%3A25IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Territorial%20cohesion%20impacts%20of%20high-speed%20rail%20at%20different%20planning%20levels&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20transport%20geography&rft.au=Ortega,%20Emilio&rft.date=2012-09&rft.volume=24&rft.spage=130&rft.epage=141&rft.pages=130-141&rft.issn=0966-6923&rft.eissn=1873-1236&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.10.008&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1365120727%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-4991b19d7b9ee0129388634cfca61cb2940ec223a1c3ae8d5a763ad7400c4c693%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1365120727&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true