Loading…
Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes
Summary The selection of a scalar Intensity Measure (IM) for performing analytical vulnerability (loss) assessment across a building class is addressed. We investigate the ability of several IM choices to downgrade the effect of seismological parameters (sufficiency) as well as reduce the record‐to‐...
Saved in:
Published in: | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics 2015-12, Vol.44 (15), p.2677-2694 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3 |
container_end_page | 2694 |
container_issue | 15 |
container_start_page | 2677 |
container_title | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics |
container_volume | 44 |
creator | Kazantzi, Athanasia K. Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios |
description | Summary
The selection of a scalar Intensity Measure (IM) for performing analytical vulnerability (loss) assessment across a building class is addressed. We investigate the ability of several IM choices to downgrade the effect of seismological parameters (sufficiency) as well as reduce the record‐to‐record variability (efficiency) for both highrise and lowrise sets of ‘index’ buildings. These characteristics are explored in unprecedented detail, employing comparisons and statistical significance testing at given levels of local engineering demand parameters (story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations) that relate to losses, instead of global variables such as the maximum interstory drift. Thus, a detailed limit‐state‐specific view is offered for the suitability of different scalar IMs for loss assessment. As expected, typical single‐period spectral values are found to introduce unwanted bias at high levels of scaling, both for a single as well as a class of buildings. On the other hand, the geometric mean of the spectral acceleration values estimated at several periods between the class‐average second‐mode and an elongated class‐average first‐mode period offers a practical choice that significantly reduces the spectral‐shape bias without requiring the development of new ground motion prediction equations. Given that record selection remains a site‐ and building‐specific process, such an improved IM can help achieve reliable estimates for building portfolios, as well as single structures, at no additional cost. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1002/eqe.2603 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770344172</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3855717131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqN0F1r1EAUBuChKHStQn9CwBtvUs_MJPNxKWVtF9d-oQi9GSaTkzJ1NmnnJOr-e7O0KBWEXp2bh_flvIwdcjjiAOI93uORUCD32IKDVaU1Vf2CLQCsKY2p9D57RXQLAFKBXrDVqh-xpzhuiw16mjIWhAnDGIe-6IZc_JhSj9k3Me0MjVMbkYqhK5oppjb2N0VIngjpNXvZ-UT45vEesK8fl1-OT8v1-cnq-MO6DJUGWYaurdByq6RtDOfea85FZ23T6LbVtdQeuQ91W1vOG1SmxuB1UB40CNMFlAfs3UPuXR7uJ6TRbSIFTMn3OEzkuJ5rqopr8QwqayuEqexM3_5Db4cp9_MjsxJWGFAW_gaGPBBl7Nxdjhuft46D283v5vndbv6Zlg_0Z0y4_a9zy8vlUx9pxF9_vM_fndJS1-7b2Yn7tFafr87qa3chfwNSjJUZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1729280690</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes</title><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection</source><creator>Kazantzi, Athanasia K. ; Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</creator><creatorcontrib>Kazantzi, Athanasia K. ; Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><description>Summary
The selection of a scalar Intensity Measure (IM) for performing analytical vulnerability (loss) assessment across a building class is addressed. We investigate the ability of several IM choices to downgrade the effect of seismological parameters (sufficiency) as well as reduce the record‐to‐record variability (efficiency) for both highrise and lowrise sets of ‘index’ buildings. These characteristics are explored in unprecedented detail, employing comparisons and statistical significance testing at given levels of local engineering demand parameters (story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations) that relate to losses, instead of global variables such as the maximum interstory drift. Thus, a detailed limit‐state‐specific view is offered for the suitability of different scalar IMs for loss assessment. As expected, typical single‐period spectral values are found to introduce unwanted bias at high levels of scaling, both for a single as well as a class of buildings. On the other hand, the geometric mean of the spectral acceleration values estimated at several periods between the class‐average second‐mode and an elongated class‐average first‐mode period offers a practical choice that significantly reduces the spectral‐shape bias without requiring the development of new ground motion prediction equations. Given that record selection remains a site‐ and building‐specific process, such an improved IM can help achieve reliable estimates for building portfolios, as well as single structures, at no additional cost. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0098-8847</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-9845</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2603</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IJEEBG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bognor Regis: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Acceleration ; Assessments ; Bias ; building class ; Buildings ; Construction ; Drift ; incremental dynamic analysis ; intensity measure ; Mathematical analysis ; Spectra ; vulnerability</subject><ispartof>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2015-12, Vol.44 (15), p.2677-2694</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kazantzi, Athanasia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><title>Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes</title><title>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</title><addtitle>Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn</addtitle><description>Summary
The selection of a scalar Intensity Measure (IM) for performing analytical vulnerability (loss) assessment across a building class is addressed. We investigate the ability of several IM choices to downgrade the effect of seismological parameters (sufficiency) as well as reduce the record‐to‐record variability (efficiency) for both highrise and lowrise sets of ‘index’ buildings. These characteristics are explored in unprecedented detail, employing comparisons and statistical significance testing at given levels of local engineering demand parameters (story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations) that relate to losses, instead of global variables such as the maximum interstory drift. Thus, a detailed limit‐state‐specific view is offered for the suitability of different scalar IMs for loss assessment. As expected, typical single‐period spectral values are found to introduce unwanted bias at high levels of scaling, both for a single as well as a class of buildings. On the other hand, the geometric mean of the spectral acceleration values estimated at several periods between the class‐average second‐mode and an elongated class‐average first‐mode period offers a practical choice that significantly reduces the spectral‐shape bias without requiring the development of new ground motion prediction equations. Given that record selection remains a site‐ and building‐specific process, such an improved IM can help achieve reliable estimates for building portfolios, as well as single structures, at no additional cost. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</description><subject>Acceleration</subject><subject>Assessments</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>building class</subject><subject>Buildings</subject><subject>Construction</subject><subject>Drift</subject><subject>incremental dynamic analysis</subject><subject>intensity measure</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Spectra</subject><subject>vulnerability</subject><issn>0098-8847</issn><issn>1096-9845</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqN0F1r1EAUBuChKHStQn9CwBtvUs_MJPNxKWVtF9d-oQi9GSaTkzJ1NmnnJOr-e7O0KBWEXp2bh_flvIwdcjjiAOI93uORUCD32IKDVaU1Vf2CLQCsKY2p9D57RXQLAFKBXrDVqh-xpzhuiw16mjIWhAnDGIe-6IZc_JhSj9k3Me0MjVMbkYqhK5oppjb2N0VIngjpNXvZ-UT45vEesK8fl1-OT8v1-cnq-MO6DJUGWYaurdByq6RtDOfea85FZ23T6LbVtdQeuQ91W1vOG1SmxuB1UB40CNMFlAfs3UPuXR7uJ6TRbSIFTMn3OEzkuJ5rqopr8QwqayuEqexM3_5Db4cp9_MjsxJWGFAW_gaGPBBl7Nxdjhuft46D283v5vndbv6Zlg_0Z0y4_a9zy8vlUx9pxF9_vM_fndJS1-7b2Yn7tFafr87qa3chfwNSjJUZ</recordid><startdate>201512</startdate><enddate>201512</enddate><creator>Kazantzi, Athanasia K.</creator><creator>Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7TG</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KL.</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7SM</scope><scope>7SU</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201512</creationdate><title>Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes</title><author>Kazantzi, Athanasia K. ; Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Acceleration</topic><topic>Assessments</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>building class</topic><topic>Buildings</topic><topic>Construction</topic><topic>Drift</topic><topic>incremental dynamic analysis</topic><topic>intensity measure</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Spectra</topic><topic>vulnerability</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kazantzi, Athanasia K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy & Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Meteorological & Geoastrophysical Abstracts - Academic</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Earthquake Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kazantzi, Athanasia K.</au><au>Vamvatsikos, Dimitrios</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes</atitle><jtitle>Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics</jtitle><addtitle>Earthquake Engng Struct. Dyn</addtitle><date>2015-12</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>15</issue><spage>2677</spage><epage>2694</epage><pages>2677-2694</pages><issn>0098-8847</issn><eissn>1096-9845</eissn><coden>IJEEBG</coden><abstract>Summary
The selection of a scalar Intensity Measure (IM) for performing analytical vulnerability (loss) assessment across a building class is addressed. We investigate the ability of several IM choices to downgrade the effect of seismological parameters (sufficiency) as well as reduce the record‐to‐record variability (efficiency) for both highrise and lowrise sets of ‘index’ buildings. These characteristics are explored in unprecedented detail, employing comparisons and statistical significance testing at given levels of local engineering demand parameters (story drift ratios and peak floor accelerations) that relate to losses, instead of global variables such as the maximum interstory drift. Thus, a detailed limit‐state‐specific view is offered for the suitability of different scalar IMs for loss assessment. As expected, typical single‐period spectral values are found to introduce unwanted bias at high levels of scaling, both for a single as well as a class of buildings. On the other hand, the geometric mean of the spectral acceleration values estimated at several periods between the class‐average second‐mode and an elongated class‐average first‐mode period offers a practical choice that significantly reduces the spectral‐shape bias without requiring the development of new ground motion prediction equations. Given that record selection remains a site‐ and building‐specific process, such an improved IM can help achieve reliable estimates for building portfolios, as well as single structures, at no additional cost. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.</abstract><cop>Bognor Regis</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1002/eqe.2603</doi><tpages>18</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0098-8847 |
ispartof | Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics, 2015-12, Vol.44 (15), p.2677-2694 |
issn | 0098-8847 1096-9845 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770344172 |
source | Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection |
subjects | Acceleration Assessments Bias building class Buildings Construction Drift incremental dynamic analysis intensity measure Mathematical analysis Spectra vulnerability |
title | Intensity measure selection for vulnerability studies of building classes |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T16%3A59%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Intensity%20measure%20selection%20for%20vulnerability%20studies%20of%20building%20classes&rft.jtitle=Earthquake%20engineering%20&%20structural%20dynamics&rft.au=Kazantzi,%20Athanasia%20K.&rft.date=2015-12&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=15&rft.spage=2677&rft.epage=2694&rft.pages=2677-2694&rft.issn=0098-8847&rft.eissn=1096-9845&rft.coden=IJEEBG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/eqe.2603&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3855717131%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4703-cfd4e919639b811aa7112f99bb7dd7537ae1ac5d5911be685eca7c6a07028fce3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1729280690&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |