Loading…

Comparison of seismic risk assessment based on macroseismic intensity and spectrum approaches using ‘SeisVARA’

A comparative study of risk assessment methodologies based on macroseismic intensity and response spectrum approaches is presented. To facilitate the comparative study, a spreadsheet-based software tool ‘SeisVARA’ is developed for the estimation of earthquake risk, in which the seismic hazard can be...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soil dynamics and earthquake engineering (1984) 2013-05, Vol.48, p.267-281
Main Authors: Haldar, Putul, Singh, Yogendra, Lang, Dominik H., Paul, D.K.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:A comparative study of risk assessment methodologies based on macroseismic intensity and response spectrum approaches is presented. To facilitate the comparative study, a spreadsheet-based software tool ‘SeisVARA’ is developed for the estimation of earthquake risk, in which the seismic hazard can be specified either in terms of macroseismic intensity, or peak ground acceleration in combination with the spectral shape and soil amplification model of various earthquake building codes, or in terms of inelastic response spectra using the ‘next generation attenuation relationships’. A comparison of these different approaches is conducted for a typical city in northern India. In addition, the effect of different parameters, e.g., level of PGA, spectral shape, source-site parameters, and soil amplification models, is studied. It is observed that not only the different approaches result in widely varying damage and loss estimates, but also the variation of parameters within a given approach can result in considerable differences. ► An open spreadsheet-based software tool for seismic loss estimation is presented. ► Case study of Dehradun, a typical north Indian city is presented. ► Deterministic seismic risk scenarios using three different approaches are presented. ► Effect of source-site parameters and soil amplification models is discussed. ► Comparative study of major national codes is presented.
ISSN:0267-7261
1879-341X
DOI:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.01.016