Loading…
Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India
We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people’s perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and env...
Saved in:
Published in: | Biological conservation 2015-07, Vol.187, p.201-211 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263 |
container_end_page | 211 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 201 |
container_title | Biological conservation |
container_volume | 187 |
creator | Varma, Varun Ratnam, Jayashree Viswanathan, Vinatha Osuri, Anand M. Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. Madhusudan, M.D. Sankaran, Mahesh Krishnadas, Meghna Barua, Deepak Budruk, Megha Isvaran, Kavita Jayapal, Rajah Joshi, Jahnavi Karanth, Krithi K. Krishnaswamy, Jagdish Kumar, Raman Mukherjee, Shomita Nagendra, Harini Niphadkar, Madhura Owen, Nisha Page, Navendu Prasad, Soumya Quader, Suhel Nandini, R. Robin, V.V. Sait, Steven M. Shah, Manzoor A. Somanathan, Hema Srinivasan, Umesh Sundaram, Bharath |
description | We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people’s perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 “raw” questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India’s biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes—“Policy and Governance”, “Biodiversity and Endangered Species” and “Protection and Conservation”—accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India’s conservation research, action and funding landscape. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770345181</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0006320715001858</els_id><sourcerecordid>1735928342</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxgysiT4bCdOFiRU8VGpEgywsFiOfRGu2rjYaaX-exzCjJisk573Pd9DyDXQAihUt-uidd74vmAUyoKKgnI4ITOoJc9ZA_KUzCilVc4ZlefkIsZ1GiWvyhn5eMVgcDc438fMd9kuOB_ccMxcjHuMmeuz4ROzVB4xHPTIjVjaZ90BQxxR3dsMjY_HOOD2J7LsrdOX5KzTm4hXv--cvD8-vC2e89XL03Jxv8oNl2zISw0IrLHGyFrIStuOixZ1DWBty2QnsK6wFbqxraG1EV2r20aWoCuGgKzic3Iz9e6C_0p_HtTWRYObje7R76MCKSkXJdTwD5SXDau5YAkVE2qCjzFgp5KarQ5HBVSN1tVaTdbVaF1RoZL1FLubYpguPjgMKhqHvUHrAppBWe_-LvgG99WO1Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1735928342</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India</title><source>Elsevier</source><creator>Varma, Varun ; Ratnam, Jayashree ; Viswanathan, Vinatha ; Osuri, Anand M. ; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. ; Madhusudan, M.D. ; Sankaran, Mahesh ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Barua, Deepak ; Budruk, Megha ; Isvaran, Kavita ; Jayapal, Rajah ; Joshi, Jahnavi ; Karanth, Krithi K. ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish ; Kumar, Raman ; Mukherjee, Shomita ; Nagendra, Harini ; Niphadkar, Madhura ; Owen, Nisha ; Page, Navendu ; Prasad, Soumya ; Quader, Suhel ; Nandini, R. ; Robin, V.V. ; Sait, Steven M. ; Shah, Manzoor A. ; Somanathan, Hema ; Srinivasan, Umesh ; Sundaram, Bharath</creator><creatorcontrib>Varma, Varun ; Ratnam, Jayashree ; Viswanathan, Vinatha ; Osuri, Anand M. ; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. ; Madhusudan, M.D. ; Sankaran, Mahesh ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Barua, Deepak ; Budruk, Megha ; Isvaran, Kavita ; Jayapal, Rajah ; Joshi, Jahnavi ; Karanth, Krithi K. ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish ; Kumar, Raman ; Mukherjee, Shomita ; Nagendra, Harini ; Niphadkar, Madhura ; Owen, Nisha ; Page, Navendu ; Prasad, Soumya ; Quader, Suhel ; Nandini, R. ; Robin, V.V. ; Sait, Steven M. ; Shah, Manzoor A. ; Somanathan, Hema ; Srinivasan, Umesh ; Sundaram, Bharath</creatorcontrib><description>We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people’s perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 “raw” questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India’s biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes—“Policy and Governance”, “Biodiversity and Endangered Species” and “Protection and Conservation”—accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India’s conservation research, action and funding landscape.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0006-3207</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-2917</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Biodiversity ; Conservation ; Ecosystems ; India ; Lists ; Perception ; Perceptions ; Priorities ; Wildlife conservation</subject><ispartof>Biological conservation, 2015-07, Vol.187, p.201-211</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Varma, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnam, Jayashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Vinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osuri, Anand M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhusudan, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankaran, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnadas, Meghna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barua, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budruk, Megha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isvaran, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayapal, Rajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Jahnavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanth, Krithi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Raman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Shomita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagendra, Harini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niphadkar, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Navendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quader, Suhel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandini, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, V.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sait, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Manzoor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somanathan, Hema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Bharath</creatorcontrib><title>Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India</title><title>Biological conservation</title><description>We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people’s perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 “raw” questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India’s biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes—“Policy and Governance”, “Biodiversity and Endangered Species” and “Protection and Conservation”—accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India’s conservation research, action and funding landscape.</description><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Conservation</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>India</subject><subject>Lists</subject><subject>Perception</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Priorities</subject><subject>Wildlife conservation</subject><issn>0006-3207</issn><issn>1873-2917</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAQhi0EEqXwDxgysiT4bCdOFiRU8VGpEgywsFiOfRGu2rjYaaX-exzCjJisk573Pd9DyDXQAihUt-uidd74vmAUyoKKgnI4ITOoJc9ZA_KUzCilVc4ZlefkIsZ1GiWvyhn5eMVgcDc438fMd9kuOB_ccMxcjHuMmeuz4ROzVB4xHPTIjVjaZ90BQxxR3dsMjY_HOOD2J7LsrdOX5KzTm4hXv--cvD8-vC2e89XL03Jxv8oNl2zISw0IrLHGyFrIStuOixZ1DWBty2QnsK6wFbqxraG1EV2r20aWoCuGgKzic3Iz9e6C_0p_HtTWRYObje7R76MCKSkXJdTwD5SXDau5YAkVE2qCjzFgp5KarQ5HBVSN1tVaTdbVaF1RoZL1FLubYpguPjgMKhqHvUHrAppBWe_-LvgG99WO1Q</recordid><startdate>201507</startdate><enddate>201507</enddate><creator>Varma, Varun</creator><creator>Ratnam, Jayashree</creator><creator>Viswanathan, Vinatha</creator><creator>Osuri, Anand M.</creator><creator>Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.</creator><creator>Madhusudan, M.D.</creator><creator>Sankaran, Mahesh</creator><creator>Krishnadas, Meghna</creator><creator>Barua, Deepak</creator><creator>Budruk, Megha</creator><creator>Isvaran, Kavita</creator><creator>Jayapal, Rajah</creator><creator>Joshi, Jahnavi</creator><creator>Karanth, Krithi K.</creator><creator>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creator><creator>Kumar, Raman</creator><creator>Mukherjee, Shomita</creator><creator>Nagendra, Harini</creator><creator>Niphadkar, Madhura</creator><creator>Owen, Nisha</creator><creator>Page, Navendu</creator><creator>Prasad, Soumya</creator><creator>Quader, Suhel</creator><creator>Nandini, R.</creator><creator>Robin, V.V.</creator><creator>Sait, Steven M.</creator><creator>Shah, Manzoor A.</creator><creator>Somanathan, Hema</creator><creator>Srinivasan, Umesh</creator><creator>Sundaram, Bharath</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201507</creationdate><title>Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India</title><author>Varma, Varun ; Ratnam, Jayashree ; Viswanathan, Vinatha ; Osuri, Anand M. ; Biesmeijer, Jacobus C. ; Madhusudan, M.D. ; Sankaran, Mahesh ; Krishnadas, Meghna ; Barua, Deepak ; Budruk, Megha ; Isvaran, Kavita ; Jayapal, Rajah ; Joshi, Jahnavi ; Karanth, Krithi K. ; Krishnaswamy, Jagdish ; Kumar, Raman ; Mukherjee, Shomita ; Nagendra, Harini ; Niphadkar, Madhura ; Owen, Nisha ; Page, Navendu ; Prasad, Soumya ; Quader, Suhel ; Nandini, R. ; Robin, V.V. ; Sait, Steven M. ; Shah, Manzoor A. ; Somanathan, Hema ; Srinivasan, Umesh ; Sundaram, Bharath</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Conservation</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>India</topic><topic>Lists</topic><topic>Perception</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Priorities</topic><topic>Wildlife conservation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Varma, Varun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratnam, Jayashree</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viswanathan, Vinatha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Osuri, Anand M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madhusudan, M.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sankaran, Mahesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnadas, Meghna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barua, Deepak</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Budruk, Megha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Isvaran, Kavita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jayapal, Rajah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joshi, Jahnavi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karanth, Krithi K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kumar, Raman</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mukherjee, Shomita</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagendra, Harini</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Niphadkar, Madhura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Owen, Nisha</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Page, Navendu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Prasad, Soumya</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Quader, Suhel</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nandini, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Robin, V.V.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sait, Steven M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shah, Manzoor A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Somanathan, Hema</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Srinivasan, Umesh</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sundaram, Bharath</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Varma, Varun</au><au>Ratnam, Jayashree</au><au>Viswanathan, Vinatha</au><au>Osuri, Anand M.</au><au>Biesmeijer, Jacobus C.</au><au>Madhusudan, M.D.</au><au>Sankaran, Mahesh</au><au>Krishnadas, Meghna</au><au>Barua, Deepak</au><au>Budruk, Megha</au><au>Isvaran, Kavita</au><au>Jayapal, Rajah</au><au>Joshi, Jahnavi</au><au>Karanth, Krithi K.</au><au>Krishnaswamy, Jagdish</au><au>Kumar, Raman</au><au>Mukherjee, Shomita</au><au>Nagendra, Harini</au><au>Niphadkar, Madhura</au><au>Owen, Nisha</au><au>Page, Navendu</au><au>Prasad, Soumya</au><au>Quader, Suhel</au><au>Nandini, R.</au><au>Robin, V.V.</au><au>Sait, Steven M.</au><au>Shah, Manzoor A.</au><au>Somanathan, Hema</au><au>Srinivasan, Umesh</au><au>Sundaram, Bharath</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India</atitle><jtitle>Biological conservation</jtitle><date>2015-07</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>187</volume><spage>201</spage><epage>211</epage><pages>201-211</pages><issn>0006-3207</issn><eissn>1873-2917</eissn><abstract>We report on the results of a country-wide survey of people’s perceptions of issues relating to the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India. Our survey, mainly conducted online, yielded 572 respondents, mostly among educated, urban and sub-urban citizens interested in ecological and environmental issues. 3160 “raw” questions generated by the survey were iteratively processed by a group of ecologists, environmental and conservation scientists to produce the primary result of this study: a summarized list of 152 priority questions for the conservation of India’s biodiversity and ecosystems, which range across 17 broad thematic classes. Of these, three thematic classes—“Policy and Governance”, “Biodiversity and Endangered Species” and “Protection and Conservation”—accounted for the largest number of questions. A comparative analysis of the results of this study with those from similar studies in other regions brought out interesting regional differences in the thematic classes of questions that were emphasized and suggest that local context plays a large role in determining emergent themes. We believe that the ready list of priority issues generated by this study can be a useful guiding framework for conservation practitioners, researchers, citizens, policy makers and funders to focus their resources and efforts in India’s conservation research, action and funding landscape.</abstract><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><doi>10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0006-3207 |
ispartof | Biological conservation, 2015-07, Vol.187, p.201-211 |
issn | 0006-3207 1873-2917 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770345181 |
source | Elsevier |
subjects | Biodiversity Conservation Ecosystems India Lists Perception Perceptions Priorities Wildlife conservation |
title | Perceptions of priority issues in the conservation of biodiversity and ecosystems in India |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T19%3A55%3A12IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Perceptions%20of%20priority%20issues%20in%20the%20conservation%20of%20biodiversity%20and%20ecosystems%20in%20India&rft.jtitle=Biological%20conservation&rft.au=Varma,%20Varun&rft.date=2015-07&rft.volume=187&rft.spage=201&rft.epage=211&rft.pages=201-211&rft.issn=0006-3207&rft.eissn=1873-2917&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.031&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1735928342%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c372t-5a1e129dcc78476adf34bea811ddb27f4e86eb4a9dbc08c4fbab9751a62e1e263%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1735928342&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |