Loading…

Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass

Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Environmental management (New York) 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540
Main Authors: Medjibe, V. P., Putz, Francis E., Romero, Claudia
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3
container_end_page 540
container_issue 3
container_start_page 524
container_title Environmental management (New York)
container_volume 51
creator Medjibe, V. P.
Putz, Francis E.
Romero, Claudia
description Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees >10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m 3 /ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m 3 /ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770355316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1312660648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6AbxIgwgetjWp_B1v2ugqDHiYXfAW0pn0mGU6GVPdgt_ejDOuIoiektT71asKj5DHjL5glOqXSCko3VIGLaVUteIOWTDBoa3q8i5ZUK5EyyR8OiMPEG8qw42R98kZcNBacLMgX7tQpjjEsGlc2jTXyd--V3m7jWnbdLkWEWNOWO_j3pUqxtRcuj6nV0332aVtwENlPR081lOZ_TSXcNFclRCa9T74GPDix4A3MY8O8SG5N7gdhken85xcv3t71b1vVx8vP3SvV62XXEyt6imA014aCNp7zsRyA56BNsDZ4MELIwUbgHMJ3rPQ64Fp413wPZNUOH5Onh999yV_mQNOdozow27nUsgzWqY15VJypv6NciYV0KWC_0FBKaqEqejTP9CbPJdU_1wpSg1fGsEqxY6ULxmxhMHuSxxd-WYZtYeo7TFqW6O2h6itqD1PTs5zP4bNbcfPbCvw7AQ49G43FJd8xF-cFqAV55WDI4dVqlGW31b86_Tv9K2-DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300839841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees &gt;10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m 3 /ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m 3 /ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23277438</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMNGDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Certification ; Comparative studies ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Damage ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Forest management ; Forestry - methods ; Forestry - standards ; Forestry Management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gabon ; General aspects ; Logging ; Nature Conservation ; Plant diversity ; Plant species ; Riparian buffers ; Roads &amp; highways ; Skids ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable forestry ; Timber ; Trees ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300839841/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300839841?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27427633$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23277438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putz, Francis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees &gt;10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m 3 /ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m 3 /ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry - methods</subject><subject>Forestry - standards</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gabon</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Roads &amp; highways</subject><subject>Skids</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable forestry</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6AbxIgwgetjWp_B1v2ugqDHiYXfAW0pn0mGU6GVPdgt_ejDOuIoiektT71asKj5DHjL5glOqXSCko3VIGLaVUteIOWTDBoa3q8i5ZUK5EyyR8OiMPEG8qw42R98kZcNBacLMgX7tQpjjEsGlc2jTXyd--V3m7jWnbdLkWEWNOWO_j3pUqxtRcuj6nV0332aVtwENlPR081lOZ_TSXcNFclRCa9T74GPDix4A3MY8O8SG5N7gdhken85xcv3t71b1vVx8vP3SvV62XXEyt6imA014aCNp7zsRyA56BNsDZ4MELIwUbgHMJ3rPQ64Fp413wPZNUOH5Onh999yV_mQNOdozow27nUsgzWqY15VJypv6NciYV0KWC_0FBKaqEqejTP9CbPJdU_1wpSg1fGsEqxY6ULxmxhMHuSxxd-WYZtYeo7TFqW6O2h6itqD1PTs5zP4bNbcfPbCvw7AQ49G43FJd8xF-cFqAV55WDI4dVqlGW31b86_Tv9K2-DA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Medjibe, V. P.</creator><creator>Putz, Francis E.</creator><creator>Romero, Claudia</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><author>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry - methods</topic><topic>Forestry - standards</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gabon</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Roads &amp; highways</topic><topic>Skids</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable forestry</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putz, Francis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medjibe, V. P.</au><au>Putz, Francis E.</au><au>Romero, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>524-540</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><coden>EMNGDC</coden><abstract>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees &gt;10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m 3 /ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m 3 /ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23277438</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0364-152X
ispartof Environmental management (New York), 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540
issn 0364-152X
1432-1009
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770355316
source ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature
subjects Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Aquatic Pollution
Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution
Biodiversity
Biological and medical sciences
Biomass
Carbon
Certification
Comparative studies
Conservation of Natural Resources
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Damage
Earth and Environmental Science
Ecology
Environment
Environmental Management
Forest management
Forestry - methods
Forestry - standards
Forestry Management
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Gabon
General aspects
Logging
Nature Conservation
Plant diversity
Plant species
Riparian buffers
Roads & highways
Skids
Species composition
Species diversity
Sustainability management
Sustainable forestry
Timber
Trees
Waste Water Technology
Water Management
Water Pollution Control
title Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Certified%20and%20Uncertified%20Logging%20Concessions%20Compared%20in%20Gabon:%20Changes%20in%20Stand%20Structure,%20Tree%20Species,%20and%20Biomass&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Medjibe,%20V.%20P.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=524-540&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft.coden=EMNGDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1312660648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300839841&rft_id=info:pmid/23277438&rfr_iscdi=true