Loading…
Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass
Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in...
Saved in:
Published in: | Environmental management (New York) 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3 |
container_end_page | 540 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 524 |
container_title | Environmental management (New York) |
container_volume | 51 |
creator | Medjibe, V. P. Putz, Francis E. Romero, Claudia |
description | Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees >10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m
3
/ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m
3
/ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770355316</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1312660648</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6AbxIgwgetjWp_B1v2ugqDHiYXfAW0pn0mGU6GVPdgt_ejDOuIoiektT71asKj5DHjL5glOqXSCko3VIGLaVUteIOWTDBoa3q8i5ZUK5EyyR8OiMPEG8qw42R98kZcNBacLMgX7tQpjjEsGlc2jTXyd--V3m7jWnbdLkWEWNOWO_j3pUqxtRcuj6nV0332aVtwENlPR081lOZ_TSXcNFclRCa9T74GPDix4A3MY8O8SG5N7gdhken85xcv3t71b1vVx8vP3SvV62XXEyt6imA014aCNp7zsRyA56BNsDZ4MELIwUbgHMJ3rPQ64Fp413wPZNUOH5Onh999yV_mQNOdozow27nUsgzWqY15VJypv6NciYV0KWC_0FBKaqEqejTP9CbPJdU_1wpSg1fGsEqxY6ULxmxhMHuSxxd-WYZtYeo7TFqW6O2h6itqD1PTs5zP4bNbcfPbCvw7AQ49G43FJd8xF-cFqAV55WDI4dVqlGW31b86_Tv9K2-DA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1300839841</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</creator><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><description>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees >10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m
3
/ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m
3
/ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0364-152X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1432-1009</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23277438</identifier><identifier>CODEN: EMNGDC</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer-Verlag</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Aquatic Pollution ; Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution ; Biodiversity ; Biological and medical sciences ; Biomass ; Carbon ; Certification ; Comparative studies ; Conservation of Natural Resources ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Damage ; Earth and Environmental Science ; Ecology ; Environment ; Environmental Management ; Forest management ; Forestry - methods ; Forestry - standards ; Forestry Management ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Gabon ; General aspects ; Logging ; Nature Conservation ; Plant diversity ; Plant species ; Riparian buffers ; Roads & highways ; Skids ; Species composition ; Species diversity ; Sustainability management ; Sustainable forestry ; Timber ; Trees ; Waste Water Technology ; Water Management ; Water Pollution Control</subject><ispartof>Environmental management (New York), 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540</ispartof><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2012</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300839841/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/1300839841?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,36061,44363,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=27427633$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23277438$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putz, Francis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><title>Environmental management (New York)</title><addtitle>Environmental Management</addtitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><description>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees >10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m
3
/ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m
3
/ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Aquatic Pollution</subject><subject>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Carbon</subject><subject>Certification</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Conservation of Natural Resources</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Earth and Environmental Science</subject><subject>Ecology</subject><subject>Environment</subject><subject>Environmental Management</subject><subject>Forest management</subject><subject>Forestry - methods</subject><subject>Forestry - standards</subject><subject>Forestry Management</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Gabon</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Logging</subject><subject>Nature Conservation</subject><subject>Plant diversity</subject><subject>Plant species</subject><subject>Riparian buffers</subject><subject>Roads & highways</subject><subject>Skids</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Sustainability management</subject><subject>Sustainable forestry</subject><subject>Timber</subject><subject>Trees</subject><subject>Waste Water Technology</subject><subject>Water Management</subject><subject>Water Pollution Control</subject><issn>0364-152X</issn><issn>1432-1009</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkU-LFDEQxYMo7rj6AbxIgwgetjWp_B1v2ugqDHiYXfAW0pn0mGU6GVPdgt_ejDOuIoiektT71asKj5DHjL5glOqXSCko3VIGLaVUteIOWTDBoa3q8i5ZUK5EyyR8OiMPEG8qw42R98kZcNBacLMgX7tQpjjEsGlc2jTXyd--V3m7jWnbdLkWEWNOWO_j3pUqxtRcuj6nV0332aVtwENlPR081lOZ_TSXcNFclRCa9T74GPDix4A3MY8O8SG5N7gdhken85xcv3t71b1vVx8vP3SvV62XXEyt6imA014aCNp7zsRyA56BNsDZ4MELIwUbgHMJ3rPQ64Fp413wPZNUOH5Onh999yV_mQNOdozow27nUsgzWqY15VJypv6NciYV0KWC_0FBKaqEqejTP9CbPJdU_1wpSg1fGsEqxY6ULxmxhMHuSxxd-WYZtYeo7TFqW6O2h6itqD1PTs5zP4bNbcfPbCvw7AQ49G43FJd8xF-cFqAV55WDI4dVqlGW31b86_Tv9K2-DA</recordid><startdate>20130301</startdate><enddate>20130301</enddate><creator>Medjibe, V. P.</creator><creator>Putz, Francis E.</creator><creator>Romero, Claudia</creator><general>Springer-Verlag</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8C1</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7SU</scope><scope>KR7</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130301</creationdate><title>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</title><author>Medjibe, V. P. ; Putz, Francis E. ; Romero, Claudia</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Aquatic Pollution</topic><topic>Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Carbon</topic><topic>Certification</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Conservation of Natural Resources</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Earth and Environmental Science</topic><topic>Ecology</topic><topic>Environment</topic><topic>Environmental Management</topic><topic>Forest management</topic><topic>Forestry - methods</topic><topic>Forestry - standards</topic><topic>Forestry Management</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Gabon</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Logging</topic><topic>Nature Conservation</topic><topic>Plant diversity</topic><topic>Plant species</topic><topic>Riparian buffers</topic><topic>Roads & highways</topic><topic>Skids</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Sustainability management</topic><topic>Sustainable forestry</topic><topic>Timber</topic><topic>Trees</topic><topic>Waste Water Technology</topic><topic>Water Management</topic><topic>Water Pollution Control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Medjibe, V. P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Putz, Francis E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Romero, Claudia</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Public Health Database (Proquest)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>PML(ProQuest Medical Library)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Science Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Medjibe, V. P.</au><au>Putz, Francis E.</au><au>Romero, Claudia</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass</atitle><jtitle>Environmental management (New York)</jtitle><stitle>Environmental Management</stitle><addtitle>Environ Manage</addtitle><date>2013-03-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>524</spage><epage>540</epage><pages>524-540</pages><issn>0364-152X</issn><eissn>1432-1009</eissn><coden>EMNGDC</coden><abstract>Forest management certification is assumed to promote sustainable forest management, but there is little field-based evidence to support this claim. To help fill this gap, we compared a Forest Stewardship Council (FSC)-certified with an adjacent uncertified, conventionally logged concession (CL) in Gabon on the basis of logging damage, above-ground biomass (AGB), and tree species diversity and composition. Before logging, we marked, mapped, and measured all trees >10 cm dbh in 20 and twelve 1-ha permanent plots in the FSC and CL areas, respectively. Soil and tree damage due to felling, skidding, and road-related activities was then assessed 2–3 months after the 508 ha FSC study area and the 200 ha CL study area were selectively logged at respective intensities of 5.7 m
3
/ha (0.39 trees/ha) and 11.4 m
3
/ha (0.76 trees/ha). For each tree felled, averages of 9.1 and 20.9 other trees were damaged in the FSC and CL plots, respectively; when expressed as the impacts per timber volume extracted, the values did not differ between the two treatments. Skid trails covered 2.9 % more of the CL surface, but skid trail length per unit timber volume extracted was not greater. Logging roads were wider in the CL than FSC site and disturbed 4.7 % more of the surface. Overall, logging caused declines in AGB of 7.1 and 13.4 % at the FSC and CL sites, respectively. Changes in tree species composition were small but greater for the CL site. Based on these findings and in light of the pseudoreplicated study design with less-than perfect counterfactual, we cautiously conclude that certification yields environmental benefits even after accounting for differences in logging intensities.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer-Verlag</pub><pmid>23277438</pmid><doi>10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0364-152X |
ispartof | Environmental management (New York), 2013-03, Vol.51 (3), p.524-540 |
issn | 0364-152X 1432-1009 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770355316 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Springer Nature |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied ecology Aquatic Pollution Atmospheric Protection/Air Quality Control/Air Pollution Biodiversity Biological and medical sciences Biomass Carbon Certification Comparative studies Conservation of Natural Resources Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife Damage Earth and Environmental Science Ecology Environment Environmental Management Forest management Forestry - methods Forestry - standards Forestry Management Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Gabon General aspects Logging Nature Conservation Plant diversity Plant species Riparian buffers Roads & highways Skids Species composition Species diversity Sustainability management Sustainable forestry Timber Trees Waste Water Technology Water Management Water Pollution Control |
title | Certified and Uncertified Logging Concessions Compared in Gabon: Changes in Stand Structure, Tree Species, and Biomass |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-21T10%3A25%3A51IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Certified%20and%20Uncertified%20Logging%20Concessions%20Compared%20in%20Gabon:%20Changes%20in%20Stand%20Structure,%20Tree%20Species,%20and%20Biomass&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20management%20(New%20York)&rft.au=Medjibe,%20V.%20P.&rft.date=2013-03-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=524&rft.epage=540&rft.pages=524-540&rft.issn=0364-152X&rft.eissn=1432-1009&rft.coden=EMNGDC&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00267-012-0006-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1312660648%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c534t-6b022a7c582e7cc3149d2c1278231fc2c48541f23352cc1eb7f178caecb1504a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1300839841&rft_id=info:pmid/23277438&rfr_iscdi=true |