Comparing AMSR-E soil moisture estimates to the extended record of the U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN)

•USCRN in situ vs. AMSR-E vs. model.•Model fares comparably vs. in situ or AMSR-E.•Model uses precip only. Soil moisture plays an integral role in multi-scale hydrologic modeling, agricultural decision analysis, climate change assessments, and drought prediction/prevention. The broad availability of...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Advances in water resources 2015-11, Vol.85, p.79-85
Main Authors: Coopersmith, Evan J., Cosh, Michael H., Bindlish, Rajat, Bell, Jesse
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
AMSR-E
Climate
Estimates
Hydrology
Mathematical models
Networks
Remote sensing
Satellites
Soil moisture
USCRN
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:•USCRN in situ vs. AMSR-E vs. model.•Model fares comparably vs. in situ or AMSR-E.•Model uses precip only. Soil moisture plays an integral role in multi-scale hydrologic modeling, agricultural decision analysis, climate change assessments, and drought prediction/prevention. The broad availability of soil moisture estimates has only occurred within the past decade through a combination of in situ networks and satellite-driven remote sensing. The U.S. Climate Reference Network (USCRN) has provided a nationwide in situ resource since 2009. The Advanced Microwave Scanning Radiometer (AMSR-E), launched in 2002, is one of the satellite products available for comparison, but there are a limited number of years where the data records overlap. This study compares the results of modeled historical soil moisture estimates derived using USCRN precipitation data to the remotely sensed estimates provided by the AMSR-E satellite between 2002 and 2011. First, this work assesses the calibrated model's similarity to in situ estimates. Next, the model estimates and in situ measurements are shown to perform comparably well against the AMSR-E satellite product, suggesting that it may be possible to utilize modeled estimates at times and locations where satellite estimates are unavailable and further extend the soil moisture record spatially and temporally.
ISSN:0309-1708
1872-9657
DOI:10.1016/j.advwatres.2015.09.003