Container movement by rail in India: A review of policy evolution

Container movement by rail was a monopoly of Indian Railways (IR) until 2005. Its subsidiary Container Corporation (CONCOR) was the sole operator of container trains. Entry of other entities in 2007 has been driven by larger public policy concerns. In the process, issues such as incumbent resistance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Transport policy 2012-07, Vol.22, p.20-28
Main Authors: Gangwar, Rachna, Morris, Sebastian, Pandey, Ajay, Raghuram, G.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Barriers
Competition
Concessions
Consultants
Container train policy
Containers
Corporations
Evolution
India
Indian Railways
Monopoly
Movement
Operators
Policies
Public policy
Railroads
Rails
Regulation
Subsidiaries
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Container movement by rail was a monopoly of Indian Railways (IR) until 2005. Its subsidiary Container Corporation (CONCOR) was the sole operator of container trains. Entry of other entities in 2007 has been driven by larger public policy concerns. In the process, issues such as incumbent resistance, entry barriers, and lack of level playing field had an impact. These issues were enhanced by the use of a closely held organisation as a consultant, and conflicting roles of IR as licensor, regulator, service provider, and operator. This paper attempts to review the process starting from the policy announcement (February 2005) to evolution of a Model Concession Agreement (January 2007). It shows how policies were influenced by the incumbent to restrict competition by creating barriers on the one hand and how an alternate view provided by external entities, like the Planning Commission and other non-IR stakeholders significantly altered the course of action leading to entry of a large number of competing players. ► We review the process of container rail policy evolution of Indian railways. ► The process was largely driven by the influence of incumbent. ► An external group could significantly alter the policy in favour of new entrants. ► The final policy attracted many players but issues still remain.
ISSN:0967-070X
1879-310X
DOI:10.1016/j.tranpol.2012.05.001