Loading…
Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre
Background Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them. Methods A retrospective revi...
Saved in:
Published in: | ANZ journal of surgery 2016-03, Vol.86 (3), p.122-126 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623 |
container_end_page | 126 |
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 122 |
container_title | ANZ journal of surgery |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Lee, Kit-Fai Cheung, Yue-Sun Chong, Charing C. N. Wong, John Fong, Anthony K. W. Lai, Paul B. S. |
description | Background
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and robotic hepatectomy (RH) in our institute. The perioperative results were reported and compared. In order to standardise the type of liver resection performed, a subgroup analysis was made for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LS) and robotic left lateral sectionectomy (RS).
Results
Sixty‐six LH and 70 RH were performed between November 2003 and January 2015. The two groups were comparable in demographic data and disease characteristics except more patient with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) occurred in RH group. More major hepatectomies were performed in RH (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.002). There was no mortality. No difference was noted in morbidity (LH 4.5%, RH 11.4%), conversion rate (LH 12.1%, RH 5.7%), median blood loss (both 100 mL) and median length of post‐operative hospital stay (both 5 days) but operative time was longer in RH (251.5 min versus 215 min, P = 0.008). There were 29 LS and 38 RS, no difference was noted in all perioperative outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusion
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy are safe and their perioperative outcomes are comparable and favourable. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/ans.13339 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770872508</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>3970472621</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kE1P4zAQQC3Eis898AdQJC7LIcVfsWtuCEFBVIB2WXG0nPEUAkkc7FRL_z2BFg4r4cvM4c2T9QjZY3TEhnfk2jRiQgizRraYlEXOmdHrq51JITbJdkpPlDKlTLFBNrmSXHCmtsjZ1HUuhgShqyBzrc9iKEM_7I_YuR6hD83iOMPXDmOFLWA2i6HJXJaq9qHGDLDtI-6SHzNXJ_y5mjvk7_nZ3elFPr2ZXJ6eTHOQipmcc-NKz40C7RQwAJgVoIBqwYRxKLQvSyUl99p7r0pvShhLWjDmgXOquNghv5beLoaXOabeNlUCrGvXYpgny7SmY80LOh7Qg__QpzCP7fC7D4ppIfW78HBJwdAgRZzZLlaNiwvLqH1va4e29qPtwO6vjPOyQf9FfsYcgKMl8K-qcfG9yZ5c__lU5suLKvX4-nXh4rNVWujC3l9P7NX9eHp7d_XbGvEGbZqRbQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1770173472</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Cheung, Yue-Sun ; Chong, Charing C. N. ; Wong, John ; Fong, Anthony K. W. ; Lai, Paul B. S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Cheung, Yue-Sun ; Chong, Charing C. N. ; Wong, John ; Fong, Anthony K. W. ; Lai, Paul B. S.</creatorcontrib><description>Background
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and robotic hepatectomy (RH) in our institute. The perioperative results were reported and compared. In order to standardise the type of liver resection performed, a subgroup analysis was made for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LS) and robotic left lateral sectionectomy (RS).
Results
Sixty‐six LH and 70 RH were performed between November 2003 and January 2015. The two groups were comparable in demographic data and disease characteristics except more patient with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) occurred in RH group. More major hepatectomies were performed in RH (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.002). There was no mortality. No difference was noted in morbidity (LH 4.5%, RH 11.4%), conversion rate (LH 12.1%, RH 5.7%), median blood loss (both 100 mL) and median length of post‐operative hospital stay (both 5 days) but operative time was longer in RH (251.5 min versus 215 min, P = 0.008). There were 29 LS and 38 RS, no difference was noted in all perioperative outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusion
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy are safe and their perioperative outcomes are comparable and favourable.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1445-1433</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1445-2197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ans.13339</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26423216</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melbourne: Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; Female ; Hepatectomy - methods ; Humans ; laparoscopic hepatectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Laparoscopy - methods ; left lateral sectionectomy ; Liver Diseases - surgery ; liver resection ; Male ; Middle Aged ; minimally invasive hepatectomy ; Mortality ; Perioperative Period ; Prospective Studies ; Retrospective Studies ; robotic hepatectomy ; Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods ; Robotics ; Surgical outcomes ; Survival Analysis ; Treatment Outcome ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>ANZ journal of surgery, 2016-03, Vol.86 (3), p.122-126</ispartof><rights>2015 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><rights>2015 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons.</rights><rights>2016 Royal Australasian College of Surgeons</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26423216$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Yue-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Charing C. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Anthony K. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Paul B. S.</creatorcontrib><title>Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre</title><title>ANZ journal of surgery</title><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><description>Background
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and robotic hepatectomy (RH) in our institute. The perioperative results were reported and compared. In order to standardise the type of liver resection performed, a subgroup analysis was made for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LS) and robotic left lateral sectionectomy (RS).
Results
Sixty‐six LH and 70 RH were performed between November 2003 and January 2015. The two groups were comparable in demographic data and disease characteristics except more patient with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) occurred in RH group. More major hepatectomies were performed in RH (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.002). There was no mortality. No difference was noted in morbidity (LH 4.5%, RH 11.4%), conversion rate (LH 12.1%, RH 5.7%), median blood loss (both 100 mL) and median length of post‐operative hospital stay (both 5 days) but operative time was longer in RH (251.5 min versus 215 min, P = 0.008). There were 29 LS and 38 RS, no difference was noted in all perioperative outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusion
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy are safe and their perioperative outcomes are comparable and favourable.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Hepatectomy - methods</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>laparoscopic hepatectomy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy</subject><subject>Laparoscopy - methods</subject><subject>left lateral sectionectomy</subject><subject>Liver Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>liver resection</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>minimally invasive hepatectomy</subject><subject>Mortality</subject><subject>Perioperative Period</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>robotic hepatectomy</subject><subject>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Surgical outcomes</subject><subject>Survival Analysis</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1445-1433</issn><issn>1445-2197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kE1P4zAQQC3Eis898AdQJC7LIcVfsWtuCEFBVIB2WXG0nPEUAkkc7FRL_z2BFg4r4cvM4c2T9QjZY3TEhnfk2jRiQgizRraYlEXOmdHrq51JITbJdkpPlDKlTLFBNrmSXHCmtsjZ1HUuhgShqyBzrc9iKEM_7I_YuR6hD83iOMPXDmOFLWA2i6HJXJaq9qHGDLDtI-6SHzNXJ_y5mjvk7_nZ3elFPr2ZXJ6eTHOQipmcc-NKz40C7RQwAJgVoIBqwYRxKLQvSyUl99p7r0pvShhLWjDmgXOquNghv5beLoaXOabeNlUCrGvXYpgny7SmY80LOh7Qg__QpzCP7fC7D4ppIfW78HBJwdAgRZzZLlaNiwvLqH1va4e29qPtwO6vjPOyQf9FfsYcgKMl8K-qcfG9yZ5c__lU5suLKvX4-nXh4rNVWujC3l9P7NX9eHp7d_XbGvEGbZqRbQ</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Lee, Kit-Fai</creator><creator>Cheung, Yue-Sun</creator><creator>Chong, Charing C. N.</creator><creator>Wong, John</creator><creator>Fong, Anthony K. W.</creator><creator>Lai, Paul B. S.</creator><general>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QO</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre</title><author>Lee, Kit-Fai ; Cheung, Yue-Sun ; Chong, Charing C. N. ; Wong, John ; Fong, Anthony K. W. ; Lai, Paul B. S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Hepatectomy - methods</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>laparoscopic hepatectomy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy</topic><topic>Laparoscopy - methods</topic><topic>left lateral sectionectomy</topic><topic>Liver Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>liver resection</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>minimally invasive hepatectomy</topic><topic>Mortality</topic><topic>Perioperative Period</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>robotic hepatectomy</topic><topic>Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Surgical outcomes</topic><topic>Survival Analysis</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Lee, Kit-Fai</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheung, Yue-Sun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chong, Charing C. N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wong, John</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fong, Anthony K. W.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lai, Paul B. S.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Biotechnology Research Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Lee, Kit-Fai</au><au>Cheung, Yue-Sun</au><au>Chong, Charing C. N.</au><au>Wong, John</au><au>Fong, Anthony K. W.</au><au>Lai, Paul B. S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre</atitle><jtitle>ANZ journal of surgery</jtitle><addtitle>ANZ J Surg</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>122</spage><epage>126</epage><pages>122-126</pages><issn>1445-1433</issn><eissn>1445-2197</eissn><abstract>Background
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy have been adopted in our centre for selected patients with benign or malignant liver diseases. This article reports the perioperative outcomes of these two approaches and tries to determine any difference between them.
Methods
A retrospective review of prospectively collected data was performed for all patients who underwent laparoscopic hepatectomy (LH) and robotic hepatectomy (RH) in our institute. The perioperative results were reported and compared. In order to standardise the type of liver resection performed, a subgroup analysis was made for laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (LS) and robotic left lateral sectionectomy (RS).
Results
Sixty‐six LH and 70 RH were performed between November 2003 and January 2015. The two groups were comparable in demographic data and disease characteristics except more patient with recurrent pyogenic cholangitis (RPC) occurred in RH group. More major hepatectomies were performed in RH (20.0% versus 3.0%, P = 0.002). There was no mortality. No difference was noted in morbidity (LH 4.5%, RH 11.4%), conversion rate (LH 12.1%, RH 5.7%), median blood loss (both 100 mL) and median length of post‐operative hospital stay (both 5 days) but operative time was longer in RH (251.5 min versus 215 min, P = 0.008). There were 29 LS and 38 RS, no difference was noted in all perioperative outcomes between the two groups.
Conclusion
Both laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy are safe and their perioperative outcomes are comparable and favourable.</abstract><cop>Melbourne</cop><pub>Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd</pub><pmid>26423216</pmid><doi>10.1111/ans.13339</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1445-1433 |
ispartof | ANZ journal of surgery, 2016-03, Vol.86 (3), p.122-126 |
issn | 1445-1433 1445-2197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1770872508 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Adult Aged Aged, 80 and over Female Hepatectomy - methods Humans laparoscopic hepatectomy Laparoscopy Laparoscopy - methods left lateral sectionectomy Liver Diseases - surgery liver resection Male Middle Aged minimally invasive hepatectomy Mortality Perioperative Period Prospective Studies Retrospective Studies robotic hepatectomy Robotic Surgical Procedures - methods Robotics Surgical outcomes Survival Analysis Treatment Outcome Young Adult |
title | Laparoscopic and robotic hepatectomy: experience from a single centre |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T11%3A10%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Laparoscopic%20and%20robotic%20hepatectomy:%20experience%20from%20a%20single%20centre&rft.jtitle=ANZ%20journal%20of%20surgery&rft.au=Lee,%20Kit-Fai&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=122&rft.epage=126&rft.pages=122-126&rft.issn=1445-1433&rft.eissn=1445-2197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ans.13339&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E3970472621%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4619-229abd296c7a6c1cccf5c6c073139ae37dbb6442d7ddd6bd9bc840511dc220623%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1770173472&rft_id=info:pmid/26423216&rfr_iscdi=true |