Loading…
Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior
Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exer...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of experimental psychology. Applied 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 133 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 124 |
container_title | Journal of experimental psychology. Applied |
container_volume | 22 |
creator | Brewster, Sarah E Elliott, Mark A McCartan, Rebecca McGregor, Bruce Kelly, Steve W |
description | Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/xap0000072 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771726693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1756074225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F1LxSAYB3CJovebPkAI3USxUrfpvIo6vR040M0J6krcfKTFNpduUd8-x-kF8sYH_fEX_wgdUHJGSSrOP3RPpiXYGtqmMpUJo5Ktx5kInhSyeNpCOyG8RlJImW2iLcZFznKabaPnmetMPdSu0w12Hj921d_BBV6-AL6xFqohYGfxvO0baKEb9ATwvBviHKd42eFrX7-Dx1fwot9r5_fQhtVNgP3vfRc93t4sZ_fJ4uFuPrtcJDotxJBIw6Uh1BrBOAOmbc5JSZigUApui1IWlmpqeWbyjFAg3HJJrOEGjCypKdNddLzK7b17GyEMqq1DBU2jO3BjUFQIGrO5TCM9-kdf3ejjRycV3xUZY3lUJytVeReCB6t6X7fafypK1FS4-is84sPvyLFswfzSn4YjOF0B3WvVh89K-6GuGgjV6H1sbwpTjCmqKMvSL_pCivw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756074225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><source>PsycARTICLES (ID required)</source><creator>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W</creator><contributor>Brewer, Neil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W ; Brewer, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-898X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2192</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xap0000072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26752514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Automobile Driving - psychology ; Behavior Change ; Driving Behavior ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Operant Conditioning ; Response Generalization ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Velocity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Brewer, Neil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steve W</creatorcontrib><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Appl</addtitle><description>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Driving Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Operant Conditioning</subject><subject>Response Generalization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1076-898X</issn><issn>1939-2192</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0F1LxSAYB3CJovebPkAI3USxUrfpvIo6vR040M0J6krcfKTFNpduUd8-x-kF8sYH_fEX_wgdUHJGSSrOP3RPpiXYGtqmMpUJo5Ktx5kInhSyeNpCOyG8RlJImW2iLcZFznKabaPnmetMPdSu0w12Hj921d_BBV6-AL6xFqohYGfxvO0baKEb9ATwvBviHKd42eFrX7-Dx1fwot9r5_fQhtVNgP3vfRc93t4sZ_fJ4uFuPrtcJDotxJBIw6Uh1BrBOAOmbc5JSZigUApui1IWlmpqeWbyjFAg3HJJrOEGjCypKdNddLzK7b17GyEMqq1DBU2jO3BjUFQIGrO5TCM9-kdf3ejjRycV3xUZY3lUJytVeReCB6t6X7fafypK1FS4-is84sPvyLFswfzSn4YjOF0B3WvVh89K-6GuGgjV6H1sbwpTjCmqKMvSL_pCivw</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Brewster, Sarah E</creator><creator>Elliott, Mark A</creator><creator>McCartan, Rebecca</creator><creator>McGregor, Bruce</creator><creator>Kelly, Steve W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><author>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Driving Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Operant Conditioning</topic><topic>Response Generalization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steve W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brewster, Sarah E</au><au>Elliott, Mark A</au><au>McCartan, Rebecca</au><au>McGregor, Bruce</au><au>Kelly, Steve W</au><au>Brewer, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Appl</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>124-133</pages><issn>1076-898X</issn><eissn>1939-2192</eissn><abstract>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26752514</pmid><doi>10.1037/xap0000072</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1076-898X |
ispartof | Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133 |
issn | 1076-898X 1939-2192 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771726693 |
source | PsycARTICLES (ID required) |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Aged Automobile Driving - psychology Behavior Change Driving Behavior Female Human Humans Intention Male Middle Aged Motivation Operant Conditioning Response Generalization Surveys and Questionnaires Velocity Young Adult |
title | Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditional%20or%20Unconditional?%20The%20Effects%20of%20Implementation%20Intentions%20on%20Driver%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Applied&rft.au=Brewster,%20Sarah%20E&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=124-133&rft.issn=1076-898X&rft.eissn=1939-2192&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xap0000072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1756074225%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756074225&rft_id=info:pmid/26752514&rfr_iscdi=true |