Loading…

Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior

Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exer...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of experimental psychology. Applied 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133
Main Authors: Brewster, Sarah E, Elliott, Mark A, McCartan, Rebecca, McGregor, Bruce, Kelly, Steve W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3
cites
container_end_page 133
container_issue 1
container_start_page 124
container_title Journal of experimental psychology. Applied
container_volume 22
creator Brewster, Sarah E
Elliott, Mark A
McCartan, Rebecca
McGregor, Bruce
Kelly, Steve W
description Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/xap0000072
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771726693</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1756074225</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpd0F1LxSAYB3CJovebPkAI3USxUrfpvIo6vR040M0J6krcfKTFNpduUd8-x-kF8sYH_fEX_wgdUHJGSSrOP3RPpiXYGtqmMpUJo5Ktx5kInhSyeNpCOyG8RlJImW2iLcZFznKabaPnmetMPdSu0w12Hj921d_BBV6-AL6xFqohYGfxvO0baKEb9ATwvBviHKd42eFrX7-Dx1fwot9r5_fQhtVNgP3vfRc93t4sZ_fJ4uFuPrtcJDotxJBIw6Uh1BrBOAOmbc5JSZigUApui1IWlmpqeWbyjFAg3HJJrOEGjCypKdNddLzK7b17GyEMqq1DBU2jO3BjUFQIGrO5TCM9-kdf3ejjRycV3xUZY3lUJytVeReCB6t6X7fafypK1FS4-is84sPvyLFswfzSn4YjOF0B3WvVh89K-6GuGgjV6H1sbwpTjCmqKMvSL_pCivw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1756074225</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><source>PsycARTICLES (ID required)</source><creator>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W</creator><contributor>Brewer, Neil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W ; Brewer, Neil</creatorcontrib><description>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1076-898X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1939-2192</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/xap0000072</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26752514</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Psychological Association</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Aged ; Automobile Driving - psychology ; Behavior Change ; Driving Behavior ; Female ; Human ; Humans ; Intention ; Male ; Middle Aged ; Motivation ; Operant Conditioning ; Response Generalization ; Surveys and Questionnaires ; Velocity ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133</ispartof><rights>2015 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>(c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved).</rights><rights>2016, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26752514$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Brewer, Neil</contributor><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steve W</creatorcontrib><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><title>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</title><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Appl</addtitle><description>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Automobile Driving - psychology</subject><subject>Behavior Change</subject><subject>Driving Behavior</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Intention</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>Motivation</subject><subject>Operant Conditioning</subject><subject>Response Generalization</subject><subject>Surveys and Questionnaires</subject><subject>Velocity</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>1076-898X</issn><issn>1939-2192</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpd0F1LxSAYB3CJovebPkAI3USxUrfpvIo6vR040M0J6krcfKTFNpduUd8-x-kF8sYH_fEX_wgdUHJGSSrOP3RPpiXYGtqmMpUJo5Ktx5kInhSyeNpCOyG8RlJImW2iLcZFznKabaPnmetMPdSu0w12Hj921d_BBV6-AL6xFqohYGfxvO0baKEb9ATwvBviHKd42eFrX7-Dx1fwot9r5_fQhtVNgP3vfRc93t4sZ_fJ4uFuPrtcJDotxJBIw6Uh1BrBOAOmbc5JSZigUApui1IWlmpqeWbyjFAg3HJJrOEGjCypKdNddLzK7b17GyEMqq1DBU2jO3BjUFQIGrO5TCM9-kdf3ejjRycV3xUZY3lUJytVeReCB6t6X7fafypK1FS4-is84sPvyLFswfzSn4YjOF0B3WvVh89K-6GuGgjV6H1sbwpTjCmqKMvSL_pCivw</recordid><startdate>201603</startdate><enddate>201603</enddate><creator>Brewster, Sarah E</creator><creator>Elliott, Mark A</creator><creator>McCartan, Rebecca</creator><creator>McGregor, Bruce</creator><creator>Kelly, Steve W</creator><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7X8</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>201603</creationdate><title>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</title><author>Brewster, Sarah E ; Elliott, Mark A ; McCartan, Rebecca ; McGregor, Bruce ; Kelly, Steve W</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Automobile Driving - psychology</topic><topic>Behavior Change</topic><topic>Driving Behavior</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Intention</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>Motivation</topic><topic>Operant Conditioning</topic><topic>Response Generalization</topic><topic>Surveys and Questionnaires</topic><topic>Velocity</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brewster, Sarah E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Elliott, Mark A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCartan, Rebecca</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McGregor, Bruce</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kelly, Steve W</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles (via ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brewster, Sarah E</au><au>Elliott, Mark A</au><au>McCartan, Rebecca</au><au>McGregor, Bruce</au><au>Kelly, Steve W</au><au>Brewer, Neil</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior</atitle><jtitle>Journal of experimental psychology. Applied</jtitle><addtitle>J Exp Psychol Appl</addtitle><date>2016-03</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>22</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>124</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>124-133</pages><issn>1076-898X</issn><eissn>1939-2192</eissn><abstract>Implementation intentions (if-then plans) exert conditional effects on behavior, meaning that their ability to change behavior is conditional upon encountering the critical situation specified in the if component of the plan. In the present study, we tested whether implementation intentions can exert unconditional effects on behavior. Consistent with the process of operant generalization, we hypothesized that implementation intentions would change behavior, not only in situations that are contextually identical to those specified in the if component but also in contextually similar situations. Implementation intentions were not expected to generate behavior-change in contextually different situations to those specified. Participants (N = 139) completed questionnaires measuring speeding behavior and motivation to speed. Experimental participants then specified implementation intentions to avoid speeding in critical situations that were contextually identical, similar, or different to those subsequently encountered on a driving simulator. Control participants received educational information about the risks of speeding. All participants then drove on a driving simulator. Consistent with the hypotheses participants in both the contextually identical and similar conditions exceeded the speed limit less frequently than did controls. There was no difference in speeding behavior between the contextually different and control conditions. Implications of the findings for behavior-change are discussed.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Psychological Association</pub><pmid>26752514</pmid><doi>10.1037/xap0000072</doi><tpages>10</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3539-6426</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1076-898X
ispartof Journal of experimental psychology. Applied, 2016-03, Vol.22 (1), p.124-133
issn 1076-898X
1939-2192
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1771726693
source PsycARTICLES (ID required)
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Automobile Driving - psychology
Behavior Change
Driving Behavior
Female
Human
Humans
Intention
Male
Middle Aged
Motivation
Operant Conditioning
Response Generalization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Velocity
Young Adult
title Conditional or Unconditional? The Effects of Implementation Intentions on Driver Behavior
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-21T06%3A58%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Conditional%20or%20Unconditional?%20The%20Effects%20of%20Implementation%20Intentions%20on%20Driver%20Behavior&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20experimental%20psychology.%20Applied&rft.au=Brewster,%20Sarah%20E&rft.date=2016-03&rft.volume=22&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=124&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=124-133&rft.issn=1076-898X&rft.eissn=1939-2192&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/xap0000072&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1756074225%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a387t-9d69d01fd7262e2af560b0271eb76f8b98f1a1f64d5401e06f690fd6ded9b1db3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1756074225&rft_id=info:pmid/26752514&rfr_iscdi=true