Loading…
Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S
Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially co...
Saved in:
Published in: | Landscape ecology 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743 |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 631 |
container_issue | 7 |
container_start_page | 621 |
container_title | Landscape ecology |
container_volume | 15 |
creator | FAUTH, Peter T GUSTAFSON, Eric J RABENOLD, Kerry N |
description | Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT] |
doi_str_mv | 10.1023/A:1008179208018 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17722417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17722417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr0HE2-rkq0m8leIXFD1ory7ZbLZN2d3UJEX89wbsydNcnnfmfQahSwK3BCi7m98TAEWkpqCAqCM0IULSSssZOUYT0JRUVEt2is5S2gIAYwAT9LlKflzj3oxtsmbn8OBy9DbhHPAQWtfjFPbROrwxjc8m4y5E_OpCjmHnrenx4NfRjDlhP-K8KXnffruUXRzx6vb9HJ10pk_u4jCnaPX48LF4rpZvTy-L-bKyVM1yJUyrjHANCDlTRhPFuFRW8-JlOVVNIxrdcNJIY5TkttNWay6gFVaLzkjOpujmb-8uhq99uV8PPlnXFy8X9qkmUlLKiSzg1T9wW_zG0q2WTGkJSpECXR8gU57Sd0XQ-lTvoh9M_KmJoEoBZ78jPW9X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>738970881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</creator><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><description>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1008179208018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird migration ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Habitats ; Hylocichla mustelina ; Landscape ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Migratory birds ; Nesting ; Offspring ; Parasitism ; Passeriformes ; Reproduction ; Species richness ; USA ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=1528804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><description>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hylocichla mustelina</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Migratory birds</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Passeriformes</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr0HE2-rkq0m8leIXFD1ory7ZbLZN2d3UJEX89wbsydNcnnfmfQahSwK3BCi7m98TAEWkpqCAqCM0IULSSssZOUYT0JRUVEt2is5S2gIAYwAT9LlKflzj3oxtsmbn8OBy9DbhHPAQWtfjFPbROrwxjc8m4y5E_OpCjmHnrenx4NfRjDlhP-K8KXnffruUXRzx6vb9HJ10pk_u4jCnaPX48LF4rpZvTy-L-bKyVM1yJUyrjHANCDlTRhPFuFRW8-JlOVVNIxrdcNJIY5TkttNWay6gFVaLzkjOpujmb-8uhq99uV8PPlnXFy8X9qkmUlLKiSzg1T9wW_zG0q2WTGkJSpECXR8gU57Sd0XQ-lTvoh9M_KmJoEoBZ78jPW9X</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>FAUTH, Peter T</creator><creator>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creator><creator>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><author>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hylocichla mustelina</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Migratory birds</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Passeriformes</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural & Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric & Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FAUTH, Peter T</au><au>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</au><au>RABENOLD, Kerry N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>621-631</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1008179208018</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0921-2973 |
ispartof | Landscape ecology, 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631 |
issn | 0921-2973 1572-9761 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17722417 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Agricultural land Animal, plant and microbial ecology Biological and medical sciences Bird migration Forests Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Habitats Hylocichla mustelina Landscape Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) Migratory birds Nesting Offspring Parasitism Passeriformes Reproduction Species richness USA Vegetation |
title | Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A24%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20landscape%20metrics%20to%20model%20source%20habitat%20for%20Neotropical%20migrants%20in%20the%20midwestern%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=FAUTH,%20Peter%20T&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=621-631&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1008179208018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E17722417%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=738970881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |