Loading…

Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S

Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially co...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Landscape ecology 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631
Main Authors: FAUTH, Peter T, GUSTAFSON, Eric J, RABENOLD, Kerry N
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743
cites
container_end_page 631
container_issue 7
container_start_page 621
container_title Landscape ecology
container_volume 15
creator FAUTH, Peter T
GUSTAFSON, Eric J
RABENOLD, Kerry N
description Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]
doi_str_mv 10.1023/A:1008179208018
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17722417</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17722417</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr0HE2-rkq0m8leIXFD1ory7ZbLZN2d3UJEX89wbsydNcnnfmfQahSwK3BCi7m98TAEWkpqCAqCM0IULSSssZOUYT0JRUVEt2is5S2gIAYwAT9LlKflzj3oxtsmbn8OBy9DbhHPAQWtfjFPbROrwxjc8m4y5E_OpCjmHnrenx4NfRjDlhP-K8KXnffruUXRzx6vb9HJ10pk_u4jCnaPX48LF4rpZvTy-L-bKyVM1yJUyrjHANCDlTRhPFuFRW8-JlOVVNIxrdcNJIY5TkttNWay6gFVaLzkjOpujmb-8uhq99uV8PPlnXFy8X9qkmUlLKiSzg1T9wW_zG0q2WTGkJSpECXR8gU57Sd0XQ-lTvoh9M_KmJoEoBZ78jPW9X</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>738970881</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</creator><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><description>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><identifier>ISSN: 0921-2973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1572-9761</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1023/A:1008179208018</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer</publisher><subject>Agricultural land ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Bird migration ; Forests ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Habitats ; Hylocichla mustelina ; Landscape ; Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...) ; Migratory birds ; Nesting ; Offspring ; Parasitism ; Passeriformes ; Reproduction ; Species richness ; USA ; Vegetation</subject><ispartof>Landscape ecology, 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Kluwer Academic Publishers 2000</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1528804$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><title>Landscape ecology</title><description>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</description><subject>Agricultural land</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Bird migration</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Habitats</subject><subject>Hylocichla mustelina</subject><subject>Landscape</subject><subject>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</subject><subject>Migratory birds</subject><subject>Nesting</subject><subject>Offspring</subject><subject>Parasitism</subject><subject>Passeriformes</subject><subject>Reproduction</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>USA</subject><subject>Vegetation</subject><issn>0921-2973</issn><issn>1572-9761</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2000</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpdkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnr0HE2-rkq0m8leIXFD1ory7ZbLZN2d3UJEX89wbsydNcnnfmfQahSwK3BCi7m98TAEWkpqCAqCM0IULSSssZOUYT0JRUVEt2is5S2gIAYwAT9LlKflzj3oxtsmbn8OBy9DbhHPAQWtfjFPbROrwxjc8m4y5E_OpCjmHnrenx4NfRjDlhP-K8KXnffruUXRzx6vb9HJ10pk_u4jCnaPX48LF4rpZvTy-L-bKyVM1yJUyrjHANCDlTRhPFuFRW8-JlOVVNIxrdcNJIY5TkttNWay6gFVaLzkjOpujmb-8uhq99uV8PPlnXFy8X9qkmUlLKiSzg1T9wW_zG0q2WTGkJSpECXR8gU57Sd0XQ-lTvoh9M_KmJoEoBZ78jPW9X</recordid><startdate>20001001</startdate><enddate>20001001</enddate><creator>FAUTH, Peter T</creator><creator>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creator><creator>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creator><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88I</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>BKSAR</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PATMY</scope><scope>PCBAR</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PYCSY</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>SOI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20001001</creationdate><title>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</title><author>FAUTH, Peter T ; GUSTAFSON, Eric J ; RABENOLD, Kerry N</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2000</creationdate><topic>Agricultural land</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Bird migration</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Habitats</topic><topic>Hylocichla mustelina</topic><topic>Landscape</topic><topic>Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)</topic><topic>Migratory birds</topic><topic>Nesting</topic><topic>Offspring</topic><topic>Parasitism</topic><topic>Passeriformes</topic><topic>Reproduction</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>USA</topic><topic>Vegetation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>FAUTH, Peter T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>RABENOLD, Kerry N</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Science Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Agricultural &amp; Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Journals</collection><collection>Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>Earth, Atmospheric &amp; Aquatic Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Environmental Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>FAUTH, Peter T</au><au>GUSTAFSON, Eric J</au><au>RABENOLD, Kerry N</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S</atitle><jtitle>Landscape ecology</jtitle><date>2000-10-01</date><risdate>2000</risdate><volume>15</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>621</spage><epage>631</epage><pages>621-631</pages><issn>0921-2973</issn><eissn>1572-9761</eissn><abstract>Size of a forest patch is a useful predictor of density and reproductive success of Neotropical migratory birds in much of eastern North America. Within these forested landscapes, large forest tracts appear to be sources - fragments in which surpluses of offspring are produced and can potentially colonize new fragments including woodlot sinks where reproduction fails to balance adult mortality. Within agricultural landscapes of the midwestern U.S., where forests are severely fragmented, high levels of brood parasitism by brown-headed cowbirds (Molothrus ater) and intense predation on nests generally result in low reproductive success for Neotropical migrants regardless of forest size. In some midwestern U.S. landscapes, however, the variation in reproductive success among forest fragments suggests that `source' habitat could still exist for Neotropical migrants. We used vegetation, fragment and landscape metrics to develop multivariate models that attempt to explain the variation in abundance and reproductive success of Neotropical migrants nesting in an agricultural landscape in northern Indiana, USA. We produced models that reasonably described the pattern of species richness of Neotropical migrants and the abundance of wood thrushes (Hylocichla mustelina) and several other Neotropical migrant species within 14 forest fragments. In contrast, we were unable to produce useful models of the reproductive success of wood thrushes breeding in the same forest fragments. Our results suggest that (1) abundance patterns of Neotropical migrants are probably influenced by both landscape- and fragment-scale factors; (2) multivariate analyses of Neotropical migrant abundance are not useful in modeling the corresponding patterns of reproductive success; and (3) the location of any remaining `source' habitat for Neotropical migrants breeding within agricultural landscapes in North America will be difficult to predict with indirect measures such as vegetation composition or landscape context. As a result, the potential for developing conservation strategies for Neotropical migrants will be limited without labor-intensive, direct measurements of demographic parameters.[PUBLICATION ABSTRACT]</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer</pub><doi>10.1023/A:1008179208018</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0921-2973
ispartof Landscape ecology, 2000-10, Vol.15 (7), p.621-631
issn 0921-2973
1572-9761
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_17722417
source Springer Nature
subjects Agricultural land
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Bird migration
Forests
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects. Techniques
Habitats
Hylocichla mustelina
Landscape
Methods and techniques (sampling, tagging, trapping, modelling...)
Migratory birds
Nesting
Offspring
Parasitism
Passeriformes
Reproduction
Species richness
USA
Vegetation
title Using landscape metrics to model source habitat for Neotropical migrants in the midwestern U.S
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T04%3A24%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Using%20landscape%20metrics%20to%20model%20source%20habitat%20for%20Neotropical%20migrants%20in%20the%20midwestern%20U.S&rft.jtitle=Landscape%20ecology&rft.au=FAUTH,%20Peter%20T&rft.date=2000-10-01&rft.volume=15&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=621&rft.epage=631&rft.pages=621-631&rft.issn=0921-2973&rft.eissn=1572-9761&rft_id=info:doi/10.1023/A:1008179208018&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E17722417%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-5ad8a5eb05768a9183478c94023c428bb5b9b41b7aa874cf9c99450d5c95fa743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=738970881&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true