Loading…
Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles
•Rough feature extraction and clustering is used to reveal the diversity of large data.•Independent evaluation of representative regions avoids signal dilution.•Signal based aggregation of data subsets gives strong predictions in noisy data.•A diverse feature set allows for better modeling of pathol...
Saved in:
Published in: | Medical image analysis 2016-05, Vol.30, p.60-71 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3 |
container_end_page | 71 |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 60 |
container_title | Medical image analysis |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Barker, Jocelyn Hoogi, Assaf Depeursinge, Adrien Rubin, Daniel L. |
description | •Rough feature extraction and clustering is used to reveal the diversity of large data.•Independent evaluation of representative regions avoids signal dilution.•Signal based aggregation of data subsets gives strong predictions in noisy data.•A diverse feature set allows for better modeling of pathology images.
Computerized analysis of digital pathology images offers the potential of improving clinical care (e.g. automated diagnosis) and catalyzing research (e.g. discovering disease subtypes). There are two key challenges thwarting computerized analysis of digital pathology images: first, whole slide pathology images are massive, making computerized analysis inefficient, and second, diverse tissue regions in whole slide images that are not directly relevant to the disease may mislead computerized diagnosis algorithms. We propose a method to overcome both of these challenges that utilizes a coarse-to-fine analysis of the localized characteristics in pathology images. An initial surveying stage analyzes the diversity of coarse regions in the whole slide image. This includes extraction of spatially localized features of shape, color and texture from tiled regions covering the slide. Dimensionality reduction of the features assesses the image diversity in the tiled regions and clustering creates representative groups. A second stage provides a detailed analysis of a single representative tile from each group. An Elastic Net classifier produces a diagnostic decision value for each representative tile. A weighted voting scheme aggregates the decision values from these tiles to obtain a diagnosis at the whole slide level. We evaluated our method by automatically classifying 302 brain cancer cases into two possible diagnoses (glioblastoma multiforme (N = 182) versus lower grade glioma (N = 120)) with an accuracy of 93.1 % (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773231868</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S1361841515001838</els_id><sourcerecordid>1773231868</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EoqXwC5CQj1wSbMdxsgcOVdUWpEpcytma2OPFKycOtlO0_74uW3rkNF_vvKN5CPnIWcsZV18O7YzWQysY71suWsbEK3LOO8WbUYru9UvO-zPyLucDY2yQkr0lZ0KNvdxJfk62y63EGQpaagLk7J03UHxcaHR0SuAXWrY5JlqOK9Ja_fkVAzY5eIvU-r0vEOgKpXbj_kj9DHvMdMt-2dMQTR0mXBNmXEq1fUBafMD8nrxxEDJ-eI4X5OfN9f3Vt-bux-33q8u7xsiBlaYflJXY9dYB28HIezONDID1UoCz084qUIMVYrLGDUq63SQU48Y4MFwI5boL8vnku6b4e8Nc9OyzwRBgwbhlzYehEx0f1Vil3UlqUsw5odNrqt-ko-ZMP_HWB_2Xt37irbnQlXfd-vR8YJvq9GXnH-Aq-HoSYH3zwWPS2XhcTHVKaIq20f_3wCPinZVZ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1773231868</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Barker, Jocelyn ; Hoogi, Assaf ; Depeursinge, Adrien ; Rubin, Daniel L.</creator><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jocelyn ; Hoogi, Assaf ; Depeursinge, Adrien ; Rubin, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><description>•Rough feature extraction and clustering is used to reveal the diversity of large data.•Independent evaluation of representative regions avoids signal dilution.•Signal based aggregation of data subsets gives strong predictions in noisy data.•A diverse feature set allows for better modeling of pathology images.
Computerized analysis of digital pathology images offers the potential of improving clinical care (e.g. automated diagnosis) and catalyzing research (e.g. discovering disease subtypes). There are two key challenges thwarting computerized analysis of digital pathology images: first, whole slide pathology images are massive, making computerized analysis inefficient, and second, diverse tissue regions in whole slide images that are not directly relevant to the disease may mislead computerized diagnosis algorithms. We propose a method to overcome both of these challenges that utilizes a coarse-to-fine analysis of the localized characteristics in pathology images. An initial surveying stage analyzes the diversity of coarse regions in the whole slide image. This includes extraction of spatially localized features of shape, color and texture from tiled regions covering the slide. Dimensionality reduction of the features assesses the image diversity in the tiled regions and clustering creates representative groups. A second stage provides a detailed analysis of a single representative tile from each group. An Elastic Net classifier produces a diagnostic decision value for each representative tile. A weighted voting scheme aggregates the decision values from these tiles to obtain a diagnosis at the whole slide level. We evaluated our method by automatically classifying 302 brain cancer cases into two possible diagnoses (glioblastoma multiforme (N = 182) versus lower grade glioma (N = 120)) with an accuracy of 93.1 % (p << 0.001). We also evaluated our method in the dataset provided for the 2014 MICCAI Pathology Classification Challenge, in which our method, trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation, produced a classification accuracy of 100% (p << 0.001). Our method showed high stability and robustness to parameter variation, with accuracy varying between 95.5% and 100% when evaluated for a wide range of parameters. Our approach may be useful to automatically differentiate between the two cancer subtypes.
[Display omitted]</description><identifier>ISSN: 1361-8415</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-8423</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26854941</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Biopsy - methods ; Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Brain Neoplasms - pathology ; Computer aided diagnosis ; Diagnosis, Differential ; Digital pathology ; Glioma - classification ; Glioma - diagnostic imaging ; Glioma - pathology ; Humans ; Image Enhancement - methods ; Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Microscopy - methods ; Object classification ; Pathology - methods ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted ; Subtraction Technique</subject><ispartof>Medical image analysis, 2016-05, Vol.30, p.60-71</ispartof><rights>2015 Elsevier B.V.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26854941$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogi, Assaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depeursinge, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><title>Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles</title><title>Medical image analysis</title><addtitle>Med Image Anal</addtitle><description>•Rough feature extraction and clustering is used to reveal the diversity of large data.•Independent evaluation of representative regions avoids signal dilution.•Signal based aggregation of data subsets gives strong predictions in noisy data.•A diverse feature set allows for better modeling of pathology images.
Computerized analysis of digital pathology images offers the potential of improving clinical care (e.g. automated diagnosis) and catalyzing research (e.g. discovering disease subtypes). There are two key challenges thwarting computerized analysis of digital pathology images: first, whole slide pathology images are massive, making computerized analysis inefficient, and second, diverse tissue regions in whole slide images that are not directly relevant to the disease may mislead computerized diagnosis algorithms. We propose a method to overcome both of these challenges that utilizes a coarse-to-fine analysis of the localized characteristics in pathology images. An initial surveying stage analyzes the diversity of coarse regions in the whole slide image. This includes extraction of spatially localized features of shape, color and texture from tiled regions covering the slide. Dimensionality reduction of the features assesses the image diversity in the tiled regions and clustering creates representative groups. A second stage provides a detailed analysis of a single representative tile from each group. An Elastic Net classifier produces a diagnostic decision value for each representative tile. A weighted voting scheme aggregates the decision values from these tiles to obtain a diagnosis at the whole slide level. We evaluated our method by automatically classifying 302 brain cancer cases into two possible diagnoses (glioblastoma multiforme (N = 182) versus lower grade glioma (N = 120)) with an accuracy of 93.1 % (p << 0.001). We also evaluated our method in the dataset provided for the 2014 MICCAI Pathology Classification Challenge, in which our method, trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation, produced a classification accuracy of 100% (p << 0.001). Our method showed high stability and robustness to parameter variation, with accuracy varying between 95.5% and 100% when evaluated for a wide range of parameters. Our approach may be useful to automatically differentiate between the two cancer subtypes.
[Display omitted]</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Biopsy - methods</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Computer aided diagnosis</subject><subject>Diagnosis, Differential</subject><subject>Digital pathology</subject><subject>Glioma - classification</subject><subject>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Glioma - pathology</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image Enhancement - methods</subject><subject>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Microscopy - methods</subject><subject>Object classification</subject><subject>Pathology - methods</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>Subtraction Technique</subject><issn>1361-8415</issn><issn>1361-8423</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1v1DAQhi0EoqXwC5CQj1wSbMdxsgcOVdUWpEpcytma2OPFKycOtlO0_74uW3rkNF_vvKN5CPnIWcsZV18O7YzWQysY71suWsbEK3LOO8WbUYru9UvO-zPyLucDY2yQkr0lZ0KNvdxJfk62y63EGQpaagLk7J03UHxcaHR0SuAXWrY5JlqOK9Ja_fkVAzY5eIvU-r0vEOgKpXbj_kj9DHvMdMt-2dMQTR0mXBNmXEq1fUBafMD8nrxxEDJ-eI4X5OfN9f3Vt-bux-33q8u7xsiBlaYflJXY9dYB28HIezONDID1UoCz084qUIMVYrLGDUq63SQU48Y4MFwI5boL8vnku6b4e8Nc9OyzwRBgwbhlzYehEx0f1Vil3UlqUsw5odNrqt-ko-ZMP_HWB_2Xt37irbnQlXfd-vR8YJvq9GXnH-Aq-HoSYH3zwWPS2XhcTHVKaIq20f_3wCPinZVZ</recordid><startdate>201605</startdate><enddate>201605</enddate><creator>Barker, Jocelyn</creator><creator>Hoogi, Assaf</creator><creator>Depeursinge, Adrien</creator><creator>Rubin, Daniel L.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201605</creationdate><title>Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles</title><author>Barker, Jocelyn ; Hoogi, Assaf ; Depeursinge, Adrien ; Rubin, Daniel L.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Biopsy - methods</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Brain Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Computer aided diagnosis</topic><topic>Diagnosis, Differential</topic><topic>Digital pathology</topic><topic>Glioma - classification</topic><topic>Glioma - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Glioma - pathology</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image Enhancement - methods</topic><topic>Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Microscopy - methods</topic><topic>Object classification</topic><topic>Pathology - methods</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>Subtraction Technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Barker, Jocelyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hoogi, Assaf</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Depeursinge, Adrien</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Daniel L.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Medical image analysis</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Barker, Jocelyn</au><au>Hoogi, Assaf</au><au>Depeursinge, Adrien</au><au>Rubin, Daniel L.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles</atitle><jtitle>Medical image analysis</jtitle><addtitle>Med Image Anal</addtitle><date>2016-05</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>30</volume><spage>60</spage><epage>71</epage><pages>60-71</pages><issn>1361-8415</issn><eissn>1361-8423</eissn><abstract>•Rough feature extraction and clustering is used to reveal the diversity of large data.•Independent evaluation of representative regions avoids signal dilution.•Signal based aggregation of data subsets gives strong predictions in noisy data.•A diverse feature set allows for better modeling of pathology images.
Computerized analysis of digital pathology images offers the potential of improving clinical care (e.g. automated diagnosis) and catalyzing research (e.g. discovering disease subtypes). There are two key challenges thwarting computerized analysis of digital pathology images: first, whole slide pathology images are massive, making computerized analysis inefficient, and second, diverse tissue regions in whole slide images that are not directly relevant to the disease may mislead computerized diagnosis algorithms. We propose a method to overcome both of these challenges that utilizes a coarse-to-fine analysis of the localized characteristics in pathology images. An initial surveying stage analyzes the diversity of coarse regions in the whole slide image. This includes extraction of spatially localized features of shape, color and texture from tiled regions covering the slide. Dimensionality reduction of the features assesses the image diversity in the tiled regions and clustering creates representative groups. A second stage provides a detailed analysis of a single representative tile from each group. An Elastic Net classifier produces a diagnostic decision value for each representative tile. A weighted voting scheme aggregates the decision values from these tiles to obtain a diagnosis at the whole slide level. We evaluated our method by automatically classifying 302 brain cancer cases into two possible diagnoses (glioblastoma multiforme (N = 182) versus lower grade glioma (N = 120)) with an accuracy of 93.1 % (p << 0.001). We also evaluated our method in the dataset provided for the 2014 MICCAI Pathology Classification Challenge, in which our method, trained and tested using 5-fold cross validation, produced a classification accuracy of 100% (p << 0.001). Our method showed high stability and robustness to parameter variation, with accuracy varying between 95.5% and 100% when evaluated for a wide range of parameters. Our approach may be useful to automatically differentiate between the two cancer subtypes.
[Display omitted]</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><pmid>26854941</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002</doi><tpages>12</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1361-8415 |
ispartof | Medical image analysis, 2016-05, Vol.30, p.60-71 |
issn | 1361-8415 1361-8423 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1773231868 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Algorithms Biopsy - methods Brain Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Brain Neoplasms - pathology Computer aided diagnosis Diagnosis, Differential Digital pathology Glioma - classification Glioma - diagnostic imaging Glioma - pathology Humans Image Enhancement - methods Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods Microscopy - methods Object classification Pathology - methods Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods Reproducibility of Results Sensitivity and Specificity Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted Subtraction Technique |
title | Automated classification of brain tumor type in whole-slide digital pathology images using local representative tiles |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-06T20%3A05%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Automated%20classification%20of%20brain%20tumor%20type%20in%20whole-slide%20digital%20pathology%20images%20using%20local%20representative%20tiles&rft.jtitle=Medical%20image%20analysis&rft.au=Barker,%20Jocelyn&rft.date=2016-05&rft.volume=30&rft.spage=60&rft.epage=71&rft.pages=60-71&rft.issn=1361-8415&rft.eissn=1361-8423&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.media.2015.12.002&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1773231868%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c470t-576d4e35dfa09a815cb80aa0542afdb9d6a67d22bdcf764f9b2601ccfac1226f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1773231868&rft_id=info:pmid/26854941&rfr_iscdi=true |