Prediction of type 1 diabetes in Sardinian schoolchildren using islet cell autoantibodies: 10-year follow-up of the Sardinian schoolchildren type 1 diabetes prediction study

• Published in: Acta diabetologica 2016-02, Vol.53 (1), p.73-79
• Main Authors: Velluzzi, Fernanda, Secci, Gianni, Sepe, Vincenzo, Klersy, Catherine, Shattock, Marion, Foxon, Richard, Songini, Marco, Mariotti, Stefano, Locatelli, Mattia, Bottazzo, Gian Franco, Loviselli, Andrea
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Adolescent; Autoantibodies - blood; Cells; Child; Child, Preschool; Children & youth; Diabetes; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - blood; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - diagnosis; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - epidemiology; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 - immunology; Disease Progression; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Glutamate Decarboxylase - immunology; Humans; Internal Medicine; Islets of Langerhans - immunology; Italy - epidemiology; Male; Medicine; Medicine & Public Health; Metabolic Diseases; Monoclonal antibodies; Nuclear polyhedrosis virus; Original Article; Prognosis; Protein Tyrosine Phosphatases - immunology; Schools - statistics & numerical data; Sensitivity and Specificity
• ISSN: 0940-5429; 1432-5233
• DOI: 10.1007/s00592-015-0751-y

Aims Stable genetic background makes individuals from the Mediterranean island of Sardinia ideal to define the predictive power of islet-related autoantibodies (IRAs): glutamic acid decarboxylase antibodies (GADA), tyrosine phosphatase-like antibodies (IA-2A), islet cell antibodies (ICA) to identify T1DM progressors. The aims of the present study were: (1) determination of IRAs reference limits in healthy non-diabetic Sardinian schoolchildren (SSc). (2) Predictive power evaluation of IRAs as single or combined determination to identify islet to identify T1DM progressors. Methods Between 1986 and 1994, 8448 SSc were tested for IRAs. All were followed up for 10 years. The predictive power of single or combination of IRAs was determined as hazard ratio (HR), sensitivity, specificity, area under the ROC curve, negative and positive predictive value (NPV, PPV). Results All 43 progressors to T1DM, but three showed at least one autoantibody positivity. HR for any single-autoantibody positivity was 55.3 times greater when compared to SSc negative for all IRAs. Any single autoantibody performed at least 64.9 % sensitivity with PPV always lower than 16 %. The best performing combination was ICA, plus IA-2A (showing 52.6 % sensitivity, 99.8 % specificity, 0.76 area under the ROC curve, 51.3 % PPV and 99.8 % NPV. Conclusions Determination of IRAs reference limits in healthy SSc by standard statistical methods is crucial to establish the power of IRAs as progression markers to T1DM. Our data offer a solid rationale for future testing of ICA and IA-2A as routine laboratory markers to identify individuals at high risk of T1DM in the general population.