Loading…
Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial
Background Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR). Objectives We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to asses...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology 2016-04, Vol.74 (4), p.709-715 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3 |
container_end_page | 715 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 709 |
container_title | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology |
container_volume | 74 |
creator | Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc |
description | Background Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR). Objectives We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to assess efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction in patients with severe photodamage. Methods In this blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with multiple AK and field cancerization of the face or scalp were treated in 2 areas with IngMeb (0.015%) daily for 3 days. After finalized IngMeb treatment, 1 area was randomized to receive topical clobetasol propionate (0.05%) twice daily for 4 days. Assessments included LSR (0-24; days 1, 4, 8, 15, 57), pain (0-10) and pruritus (0-3; days 1-15), AK clearance (days 15, 57), and cosmetic outcome (0-3; day 57). Results Clobetasol propionate application had no influence on LSR ( P = .939), pain ( P = .500), pruritus ( P = .312), or AK cure rate ( P = .991). Overall, IngMeb cleared 86% of all AK lesions, exerting a therapeutic effect on all AK severity grades; cure rates were 88%, 70%, and 60% for grade I, II, and III AK, respectively. Skin texture improved significantly in remedied areas (2.0 vs 1.0; P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.034 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774164273</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0190962215025116</els_id><sourcerecordid>1774164273</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggL8siwTdxnAxCSKOKn4hKLChr68a-KZ4m8WA7SMMj8ZQ4TMuCBSvryucc2ee7WfYceAEc5Kt9sUc0RcmhLgAKXokH2Qb4tsll0zYPsw2HLc-3sizPsich7DnnW1E1j7OzUrbABa822a9rd7AaR6adj1a7EMk7a9g3DGx2zM7DuNCsibn5z4DThNGmwXlGw5Cs-shwSK50fUOzG9lE_RIxEoueME40R-YGduPREOtYdKzrOoY62tlqdkseowsU2MXu08vXbMc8zsZN9icZpsdVkx4XvcXxafZowDHQs7vzPPv6_t315cf86vOH7nJ3lWvRQsylqeq-NRoglSP5AHrbirpvSAhNgLytjOjbXssSOW-kMEOFjZCICLyFeqjOs4tT7sG77wuFqCYbNI0jzuSWoKBpBEhRNlWSliep9i4ET4M6eDuhPyrgamWk9mplpFZGCkAlRsn04i5_6Scyfy33UJLgzUlA6Zc_LHkVtF0hGOtJR2Wc_X_-23_s9z3e0pHC3i1-Tv0pUKFUXH1Zt2RdEqh5WQPI6jehebmz</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1774164273</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial</title><source>ScienceDirect Freedom Collection</source><creator>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD ; Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD ; Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD ; Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD ; Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</creator><creatorcontrib>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD ; Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD ; Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD ; Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD ; Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</creatorcontrib><description>Background Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR). Objectives We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to assess efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction in patients with severe photodamage. Methods In this blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with multiple AK and field cancerization of the face or scalp were treated in 2 areas with IngMeb (0.015%) daily for 3 days. After finalized IngMeb treatment, 1 area was randomized to receive topical clobetasol propionate (0.05%) twice daily for 4 days. Assessments included LSR (0-24; days 1, 4, 8, 15, 57), pain (0-10) and pruritus (0-3; days 1-15), AK clearance (days 15, 57), and cosmetic outcome (0-3; day 57). Results Clobetasol propionate application had no influence on LSR ( P = .939), pain ( P = .500), pruritus ( P = .312), or AK cure rate ( P = .991). Overall, IngMeb cleared 86% of all AK lesions, exerting a therapeutic effect on all AK severity grades; cure rates were 88%, 70%, and 60% for grade I, II, and III AK, respectively. Skin texture improved significantly in remedied areas (2.0 vs 1.0; P < .001); no hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, or scarring were observed. Limitations These results do not provide safety and efficacy beyond 2 months of follow-up. Conclusion Application of clobetasol propionate does not alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR after 3 days of IngMeb treatment.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0190-9622</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-6787</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.034</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26810403</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>actinic keratoses ; actinic keratosis ; Administration, Topical ; Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use ; Aged ; Aged, 80 and over ; blinded ; clearance ; clobetasol ; Clobetasol - therapeutic use ; corticosteroid ; cosmesis ; cosmetic outcome ; cure rate ; Denmark ; Dermatology ; Diterpenes - adverse effects ; Diterpenes - therapeutic use ; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug ; Drug Administration Schedule ; Drug Therapy, Combination ; Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis ; Facial Dermatoses - drug therapy ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; Gels - therapeutic use ; glucocorticoid ; Humans ; hyperkeratotic ; inflammation ; ingenol mebutate ; Keratosis, Actinic - diagnosis ; Keratosis, Actinic - drug therapy ; local skin responses ; Male ; Middle Aged ; pain ; Pain - chemically induced ; Pain - drug therapy ; Pain - physiopathology ; patient satisfaction ; photodamage ; pruritus ; Pruritus - chemically induced ; Pruritus - drug therapy ; Pruritus - physiopathology ; rejuvenation ; Risk Assessment ; Scalp Dermatoses - diagnosis ; Scalp Dermatoses - drug therapy ; Severity of Illness Index ; Single-Blind Method ; skin texture ; Treatment Outcome</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016-04, Vol.74 (4), p.709-715</ispartof><rights>American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Academy of Dermatology, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26810403$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</creatorcontrib><title>Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial</title><title>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</title><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><description>Background Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR). Objectives We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to assess efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction in patients with severe photodamage. Methods In this blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with multiple AK and field cancerization of the face or scalp were treated in 2 areas with IngMeb (0.015%) daily for 3 days. After finalized IngMeb treatment, 1 area was randomized to receive topical clobetasol propionate (0.05%) twice daily for 4 days. Assessments included LSR (0-24; days 1, 4, 8, 15, 57), pain (0-10) and pruritus (0-3; days 1-15), AK clearance (days 15, 57), and cosmetic outcome (0-3; day 57). Results Clobetasol propionate application had no influence on LSR ( P = .939), pain ( P = .500), pruritus ( P = .312), or AK cure rate ( P = .991). Overall, IngMeb cleared 86% of all AK lesions, exerting a therapeutic effect on all AK severity grades; cure rates were 88%, 70%, and 60% for grade I, II, and III AK, respectively. Skin texture improved significantly in remedied areas (2.0 vs 1.0; P < .001); no hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, or scarring were observed. Limitations These results do not provide safety and efficacy beyond 2 months of follow-up. Conclusion Application of clobetasol propionate does not alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR after 3 days of IngMeb treatment.</description><subject>actinic keratoses</subject><subject>actinic keratosis</subject><subject>Administration, Topical</subject><subject>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Aged, 80 and over</subject><subject>blinded</subject><subject>clearance</subject><subject>clobetasol</subject><subject>Clobetasol - therapeutic use</subject><subject>corticosteroid</subject><subject>cosmesis</subject><subject>cosmetic outcome</subject><subject>cure rate</subject><subject>Denmark</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>Diterpenes - adverse effects</subject><subject>Diterpenes - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</subject><subject>Drug Administration Schedule</subject><subject>Drug Therapy, Combination</subject><subject>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Facial Dermatoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>Gels - therapeutic use</subject><subject>glucocorticoid</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>hyperkeratotic</subject><subject>inflammation</subject><subject>ingenol mebutate</subject><subject>Keratosis, Actinic - diagnosis</subject><subject>Keratosis, Actinic - drug therapy</subject><subject>local skin responses</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>pain</subject><subject>Pain - chemically induced</subject><subject>Pain - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pain - physiopathology</subject><subject>patient satisfaction</subject><subject>photodamage</subject><subject>pruritus</subject><subject>Pruritus - chemically induced</subject><subject>Pruritus - drug therapy</subject><subject>Pruritus - physiopathology</subject><subject>rejuvenation</subject><subject>Risk Assessment</subject><subject>Scalp Dermatoses - diagnosis</subject><subject>Scalp Dermatoses - drug therapy</subject><subject>Severity of Illness Index</subject><subject>Single-Blind Method</subject><subject>skin texture</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><issn>0190-9622</issn><issn>1097-6787</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9ks1u1DAUhSMEokPhBVggL8siwTdxnAxCSKOKn4hKLChr68a-KZ4m8WA7SMMj8ZQ4TMuCBSvryucc2ee7WfYceAEc5Kt9sUc0RcmhLgAKXokH2Qb4tsll0zYPsw2HLc-3sizPsich7DnnW1E1j7OzUrbABa822a9rd7AaR6adj1a7EMk7a9g3DGx2zM7DuNCsibn5z4DThNGmwXlGw5Cs-shwSK50fUOzG9lE_RIxEoueME40R-YGduPREOtYdKzrOoY62tlqdkseowsU2MXu08vXbMc8zsZN9icZpsdVkx4XvcXxafZowDHQs7vzPPv6_t315cf86vOH7nJ3lWvRQsylqeq-NRoglSP5AHrbirpvSAhNgLytjOjbXssSOW-kMEOFjZCICLyFeqjOs4tT7sG77wuFqCYbNI0jzuSWoKBpBEhRNlWSliep9i4ET4M6eDuhPyrgamWk9mplpFZGCkAlRsn04i5_6Scyfy33UJLgzUlA6Zc_LHkVtF0hGOtJR2Wc_X_-23_s9z3e0pHC3i1-Tv0pUKFUXH1Zt2RdEqh5WQPI6jehebmz</recordid><startdate>20160401</startdate><enddate>20160401</enddate><creator>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD</creator><creator>Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160401</creationdate><title>Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial</title><author>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD ; Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD ; Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD ; Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD ; Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>actinic keratoses</topic><topic>actinic keratosis</topic><topic>Administration, Topical</topic><topic>Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Aged, 80 and over</topic><topic>blinded</topic><topic>clearance</topic><topic>clobetasol</topic><topic>Clobetasol - therapeutic use</topic><topic>corticosteroid</topic><topic>cosmesis</topic><topic>cosmetic outcome</topic><topic>cure rate</topic><topic>Denmark</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>Diterpenes - adverse effects</topic><topic>Diterpenes - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Drug</topic><topic>Drug Administration Schedule</topic><topic>Drug Therapy, Combination</topic><topic>Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Facial Dermatoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>Gels - therapeutic use</topic><topic>glucocorticoid</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>hyperkeratotic</topic><topic>inflammation</topic><topic>ingenol mebutate</topic><topic>Keratosis, Actinic - diagnosis</topic><topic>Keratosis, Actinic - drug therapy</topic><topic>local skin responses</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>pain</topic><topic>Pain - chemically induced</topic><topic>Pain - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pain - physiopathology</topic><topic>patient satisfaction</topic><topic>photodamage</topic><topic>pruritus</topic><topic>Pruritus - chemically induced</topic><topic>Pruritus - drug therapy</topic><topic>Pruritus - physiopathology</topic><topic>rejuvenation</topic><topic>Risk Assessment</topic><topic>Scalp Dermatoses - diagnosis</topic><topic>Scalp Dermatoses - drug therapy</topic><topic>Severity of Illness Index</topic><topic>Single-Blind Method</topic><topic>skin texture</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Erlendsson, Andrés Már, MD, PhD</au><au>Karmisholt, Katrine Elisabeth, MD</au><au>Haak, Christina Skovbølling, MD, PhD</au><au>Stender, Ida-Marie, MD, PhD</au><au>Haedersdal, Merete, MD, PhD, DMSc</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology</jtitle><addtitle>J Am Acad Dermatol</addtitle><date>2016-04-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>74</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>709</spage><epage>715</epage><pages>709-715</pages><issn>0190-9622</issn><eissn>1097-6787</eissn><abstract>Background Ingenol mebutate (IngMeb) is approved for treatment of actinic keratoses (AK) and may cause unpredictable local skin responses (LSR). Objectives We sought to investigate whether IngMeb-induced LSR, pain, and pruritus could be alleviated with a topical glucocorticoid and, further, to assess efficacy, cosmetic outcome, and patient satisfaction in patients with severe photodamage. Methods In this blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial, patients with multiple AK and field cancerization of the face or scalp were treated in 2 areas with IngMeb (0.015%) daily for 3 days. After finalized IngMeb treatment, 1 area was randomized to receive topical clobetasol propionate (0.05%) twice daily for 4 days. Assessments included LSR (0-24; days 1, 4, 8, 15, 57), pain (0-10) and pruritus (0-3; days 1-15), AK clearance (days 15, 57), and cosmetic outcome (0-3; day 57). Results Clobetasol propionate application had no influence on LSR ( P = .939), pain ( P = .500), pruritus ( P = .312), or AK cure rate ( P = .991). Overall, IngMeb cleared 86% of all AK lesions, exerting a therapeutic effect on all AK severity grades; cure rates were 88%, 70%, and 60% for grade I, II, and III AK, respectively. Skin texture improved significantly in remedied areas (2.0 vs 1.0; P < .001); no hypopigmentation, hyperpigmentation, or scarring were observed. Limitations These results do not provide safety and efficacy beyond 2 months of follow-up. Conclusion Application of clobetasol propionate does not alleviate IngMeb-induced LSR after 3 days of IngMeb treatment.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26810403</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.034</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0190-9622 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2016-04, Vol.74 (4), p.709-715 |
issn | 0190-9622 1097-6787 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_miscellaneous_1774164273 |
source | ScienceDirect Freedom Collection |
subjects | actinic keratoses actinic keratosis Administration, Topical Adrenal Cortex Hormones - therapeutic use Aged Aged, 80 and over blinded clearance clobetasol Clobetasol - therapeutic use corticosteroid cosmesis cosmetic outcome cure rate Denmark Dermatology Diterpenes - adverse effects Diterpenes - therapeutic use Dose-Response Relationship, Drug Drug Administration Schedule Drug Therapy, Combination Facial Dermatoses - diagnosis Facial Dermatoses - drug therapy Female Follow-Up Studies Gels - therapeutic use glucocorticoid Humans hyperkeratotic inflammation ingenol mebutate Keratosis, Actinic - diagnosis Keratosis, Actinic - drug therapy local skin responses Male Middle Aged pain Pain - chemically induced Pain - drug therapy Pain - physiopathology patient satisfaction photodamage pruritus Pruritus - chemically induced Pruritus - drug therapy Pruritus - physiopathology rejuvenation Risk Assessment Scalp Dermatoses - diagnosis Scalp Dermatoses - drug therapy Severity of Illness Index Single-Blind Method skin texture Treatment Outcome |
title | Topical corticosteroid has no influence on inflammation or efficacy after ingenol mebutate treatment of grade I to III actinic keratoses (AK): A randomized clinical trial |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T23%3A13%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Topical%20corticosteroid%20has%20no%20influence%20on%20inflammation%20or%20efficacy%20after%20ingenol%20mebutate%20treatment%20of%20grade%20I%20to%20III%20actinic%20keratoses%20(AK):%20A%20randomized%20clinical%20trial&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Academy%20of%20Dermatology&rft.au=Erlendsson,%20Andr%C3%A9s%20M%C3%A1r,%20MD,%20PhD&rft.date=2016-04-01&rft.volume=74&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=709&rft.epage=715&rft.pages=709-715&rft.issn=0190-9622&rft.eissn=1097-6787&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jaad.2015.11.034&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E1774164273%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c481t-6d35b8dc11aad60f1c9845b7e44ce1a083d4b8bc62a00764df3a746aaa10815f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1774164273&rft_id=info:pmid/26810403&rfr_iscdi=true |