Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: A multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer

Abstract Objective To compare perioperative and clinico-pathological outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH). Methods This retrospective multi-center study abstracted demographic, clinico-pathol...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:European journal of surgical oncology 2016-04, Vol.42 (4), p.513-522
Main Authors: Sert, B.M, Boggess, J.F, Ahmad, S, Jackson, A.L, Stavitzski, N.M, Dahl, A.A, Holloway, R.W
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cervical cancer
Early-stage
Female
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Hysterectomy - methods
Incidence
Intra-operative complications
Middle Aged
Morbidity
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local - epidemiology
Neoplasm Staging
Norway - epidemiology
Open radical hysterectomy
Prognosis
Recurrence
Retrospective Studies
Robotic radical hysterectomy
Robotics - methods
Surgery
Survival
Survival Rate - trends
United States - epidemiology
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - diagnosis
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms - surgery
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Abstract Objective To compare perioperative and clinico-pathological outcomes of patients with early-stage cervical cancer who underwent robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (RRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH). Methods This retrospective multi-center study abstracted demographic, clinico-pathological and perioperative outcomes data from medical records of 491 cervical cancer patients treated with RRH (n = 259) ORH (n = 232) between 2005 and 2011 at two American and one Norwegian University Cancer Centres. Results Mean estimated blood loss (EBL) and transfusion rates were less for RRH than for ORH (97 vs. 49 mL, p  
ISSN:0748-7983
1532-2157
DOI:10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014